Polity Set 187
π
π Constitutional Bodies β’ NCBC
Q.1) The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) gained constitutional status under Article 338B. Which Ministry provides the nodal administrative support to the NCBC?
Ans > Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment
- Constitutional Evolution: The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) was initially established as a mere statutory body in 1993. It was finally granted full constitutional status through the landmark 102nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 2018, which formally inserted Article 338B into the Indian Constitution.
- Administrative Jurisdiction: Despite its newly elevated constitutional status and independence, the nodal ministry responsible for administrative support, policy coordination, and budgetary allocations remains the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.
- Expanded Powers: Previously, the statutory NCBC could only recommend inclusions or exclusions from the central list of OBCs. With constitutional status, it acquired the vital authority to investigate and monitor all matters relating to the constitutional safeguards provided for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBCs).
π Constitutional Bodies β’ NCST
Q.2) The National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST), established under Article 338A, submits its annual report to the President. Who determines the conditions of service and tenure of office of the Chairperson and Members of the NCST?
Ans > The President by rule
- Presidential Authority over NCST: Article 338A established the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes as an independent, high-level constitutional body. To ensure its functional autonomy, the Constitution explicitly empowers the President of India to determine the conditions of service and tenure of the Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson, and other Members through established rules.
- Current Operational Rules: Under the specific guidelines of the NCST Rules, 2004, the tenure for these positions is fixed at exactly three years. They are appointed directly by the President by warrant under his hand and seal.
- Distinction from other Bodies: This direct Presidential rule-making power is a distinct feature of the Commissions for SCs, STs, and BCs. In contrast, the service conditions for other constitutional bodies like the Election Commission are determined by Parliament through specific acts.
π Local Government β’ Panchayats
Q.3) The 73rd Amendment Act provides for a 5-year term for Panchayats at every level. If a Panchayat is dissolved prematurely, elections must be held within six months. What is the tenure of the newly elected Panchayat?
Ans > Only the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued
- The Remainder Term Principle: The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992 firmly established a uniform five-year term for all Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) across India. However, if a Panchayat is dissolved before completing its full term, the newly elected body does not receive a fresh five-year mandate; it serves only for the unexpired duration.
- Rationale for Synchronization: This “remainder term” rule is deliberately designed to maintain the strict synchronization of local body elections across the entire state, avoiding constant model code of conduct enforcement year-round.
- The Six-Month Exception: If the remainder of the period for the dissolved Panchayat is calculated to be less than six months, it is not mandatory for the State Election Commission to hold by-elections.
π Local Government β’ PESA Act
Q.4) Under the PESA Act, 1996, what specific power is granted to the Gram Sabha or the Panchayats at the appropriate level regarding the sale of intoxicants?
Ans > The power to enforce prohibition or to regulate or restrict the sale and consumption of any intoxicant
- Empowering the Gram Sabha: The Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), legally recognizes the Gram Sabha (the village assembly) as the primary center of governance, granting it extensive and unprecedented powers over local resources.
- Cultural Context of Prohibition: PESA specifically grants the Gram Sabha the power to autonomously regulate, restrict, or entirely prohibit intoxicants to prevent the commercial exploitation and socio-economic distress caused by outside forces in Scheduled Areas.
- Overriding State Excise Laws: This specific provision acts as a powerful constitutional safeguard. Standard state excise policies and liquor licensing cannot be blindly enforced in Scheduled V Areas without the active consent or regulatory oversight of the local Gram Sabha.
π State Legislature β’ Legislative Council
Q.5) Under Article 169, Parliament can abolish or create a State Legislative Council. Is a law passed by Parliament for this purpose considered a Constitutional Amendment under Article 368?
Ans > No, it is passed by a simple majority like an ordinary piece of legislation.
- Constitutional Flexibility: Article 169 of the Indian Constitution provides a highly flexible mechanism for individual states to decide whether they want a bicameral legislature through a state assembly resolution passed by a special majority.
- Parliamentary Enactment: Once the state passes the resolution, the Union Parliament must pass a specific law to give legal effect to this state resolution using a standard simple majority, exactly like an ordinary bill.
- Exemption from Article 368: Article 169 explicitly states that any such law passed by Parliament “shall not be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of Article 368,” avoiding rigid nationwide amendment procedures for a single state’s structural change.
π State Legislature β’ Composition
Q.6) The Constitution prescribes that the total number of members in the Legislative Council of a State shall not exceed one-third of the total number of members in the Legislative Assembly of that State, and shall not be less than:
Ans > 40
- Proportional Representation Limit: Article 171 meticulously outlines the composition of State Legislative Councils (Vidhan Parishad), capping its maximum strength strictly at one-third of the total membership of the respective State Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha).
- The Minimum Floor of 40: The Constitution also mandates a strict minimum numerical strength of 40 members for any Legislative Council. This floor ensures that the Council has a sufficient baseline number of diverse voices, representatives of local bodies, teachers, and graduates.
- Historical Exceptions: Historically, there was an exception. The Legislative Council of Jammu and Kashmir, prior to the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, operated with only 36 members. Today, the constitutional rule of 40 applies universally.
π Union Executive β’ President
Q.7) Who acts as the returning officer for the election to the office of the President of India?
Ans > The Secretary-General of the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha (by rotation)
- Neutrality in Election Administration: The election of the President of India is an indirect electoral exercise involving the entire Electoral College. To maintain absolute political neutrality, the Election Commission (ECI) appoints a senior parliamentary official as the Returning Officer, rather than a civil servant.
- The Rotation System: By firmly established convention and statutory rules framed under the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, the prestigious role of the Returning Officer alternates routinely between the Secretary-General of the Lok Sabha and the Secretary-General of the Rajya Sabha.
- Assistance Network: The Returning Officer is assisted by a network of Assistant Returning Officers (AROs), typically the senior Secretaries of the various State Legislative Assemblies, to facilitate the secret ballot voting process for MLAs in state capitals.
π Union Executive β’ President
Q.8) If the election of the President is declared void by the Supreme Court, what happens to the acts done by the President in the performance of their duties before the date of such a decision?
Ans > The acts remain valid and continue to remain in force.
- Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court: Article 71 of the Indian Constitution grants the Supreme Court of India the exclusive and original jurisdiction to decide all legal disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice-President.
- Doctrine of De Facto Authority: If the Supreme Court ultimately declares the election of a sitting President void, a massive constitutional crisis and governance breakdown could ensue if all past executive actions were suddenly nullified.
- Validity of Prior Acts: Article 71(2) explicitly protects the continuity of state governance. Laws signed, pardons granted, and appointments made during that period remain entirely valid, legal, and binding even if the election is subsequently voided.
π Union Executive β’ Cabinet
Q.9) The Constitution mentions the term “Cabinet” only once, in Article 352. Which Constitutional Amendment introduced it?
Ans > 44th Amendment Act
- Original Constitutional Silence: When adopted in 1950, the Constitution relied entirely on the broad term “Council of Ministers”. The specific term “Cabinet” was conspicuously absent from the original text, operating merely as an unwritten convention.
- The Emergency Context: The necessity to legally define the Cabinet arose directly from the highly controversial imposition of the Internal Emergency in 1975, which was declared on the sole, unilateral advice of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi without consulting the broader Cabinet.
- The 44th Amendment Safeguard: The Morarji Desai government enacted the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act in 1978, explicitly amending Article 352 to mandate that the President can proclaim a National Emergency only after receiving a formal, written recommendation from the “Union Cabinet.”
π Union Executive β’ Council of Ministers
Q.10) What is the fundamental difference between the “Council of Ministers” and the “Cabinet”?
Ans > The Council of Ministers consists of 60 to 70 ministers of all categories, whereas the Cabinet is a smaller, core group of 15 to 20 senior ministers.
- The Three-Tier Structure: The Council of Ministers is the constitutionally mandated body (under Articles 74 and 75) that encompasses all categories of ministers (Cabinet Ministers, Ministers of State, and Deputy Ministers), usually consisting of 60 to 80 members.
- The Inner Circle of Power: The Cabinet is a smaller, exclusive, and highly powerful sub-set of the Council of Ministers, comprising only the senior-most cabinet-rank ministers holding crucial national portfolios (like Home Affairs, Defense, Finance), usually consisting of 15 to 20 ministers.
- Decision-Making Authority: While the Council of Ministers is legally the highest executive body, its massive size means it rarely meets as a whole. The Cabinet meets regularly, deliberates on major policy matters, and takes binding decisions on behalf of the entire Council.
π Union Executive β’ Prime Minister
Q.11) Article 78 states that it shall be the duty of the Prime Minister to communicate to the President all decisions of the Council of Ministers relating to the administration of the affairs of the Union and proposals for legislation. If the President calls for information relating to these matters, the Prime Minister is:
Ans > Constitutionally bound to furnish it
- The Communication Bridge: Article 78 firmly establishes the Prime Minister as the vital constitutional and administrative link between the President (the de jure head of state) and the Council of Ministers (the de facto executive).
- Proactive and Reactive Duties: The Prime Minister must proactively communicate all Cabinet decisions. Furthermore, if the President actively requests specific information regarding Union affairs, the Prime Minister is constitutionally bound to furnish it without delay.
- Individual to Collective Responsibility: Article 78(c) empowers the President to require the PM to submit a matter for the consideration of the entire Council of Ministers if a decision was taken by an individual minister without broader Cabinet consultation.
π Parliament β’ Motions
Q.12) In Parliamentary procedure, what is the meaning of the motion of “Closure”?
Ans > A motion moved by a member to cut short the debate on a matter before the House and put it to vote.
- Managing Parliamentary Time: In a vibrant democracy, debates can become prolonged or used as a filibustering tactic. The motion of “Closure” is a vital procedural tool used to manage the severe scarcity of legislative time.
- Cutting Short the Debate: A closure motion can be officially moved by any member to abruptly end an ongoing debate on a bill, resolution, or general motion to force an immediate decision by the chamber.
- Speaker’s Strict Discretion: The motion is subject to the strict discretion of the Speaker or Chairman. They will only permit it if they believe the matter has been sufficiently debated without infringing upon the minority’s rights to express their views.
π Parliament β’ Motions
Q.13) What is a “Simple Closure” motion?
Ans > A motion where a member moves that the “matter having been sufficiently discussed be now put to vote.”
- The Most Common Form: “Simple Closure” is by far the most basic and frequently utilized variation of the closure motion to conclude discussions when a general consensus or exhaustion of new arguments is reached.
- The Standard Procedural Phrase: A member initiates this by moving a specific procedural phrase: “that the matter having been sufficiently discussed be now put to vote.”
- Immediate Legislative Action: If accepted by the presiding officer, all ongoing debate is halted, and the core issue or distinct clause under active discussion is promptly put to the House for a formal vote.
π Parliament β’ Motions
Q.14) What is a “Closure by Compartments” motion?
Ans > The clauses of a lengthy bill are grouped into parts, and the entire part is debated and voted upon as a whole.
- Handling Voluminous Legislation: When Parliament is dealing with extensive legislation (like the Union budget or civil codes) containing hundreds of intricate clauses, debating each individually is impossible within limited time.
- Grouping for Legislative Efficiency: Prior to the debate, numerous clauses are logically grouped into larger, thematic “parts” or “compartments” (often negotiated by the Business Advisory Committee).
- Voting on the Block: The House discusses the entire thematic compartment as a single unit. Once debate concludes, the entire compartment is put to vote as a single entity, significantly streamlining passage.
π Parliament β’ Motions
Q.15) What is a “Kangaroo Closure” motion?
Ans > A motion where only the most important clauses are debated and voted on, and the intervening clauses are skipped over and taken as passed.
- The Leaping Metaphor: The term “Kangaroo Closure” is derived from the animal’s jumping motion, literally allowing the House to “jump” over less critical sections of a massive bill.
- Highly Selective Debate: When approved, only the most vital, highly controversial, or legally significant clauses of a bill are selected for active, detailed debate and subsequent voting on the floor.
- Presumption of Passage: The intervening, minor clauses that are intentionally skipped over are automatically presumed to be passed by the House without any debate or individual voting.
π Parliament β’ Motions
Q.16) What is a “Guillotine Closure” motion?
Ans > A motion where the undiscussed clauses of a bill or resolution are put to vote along with the discussed ones due to lack of time.
- The Ultimate Deadline Tool: The “Guillotine” is the most forceful procedural weapon used to wrap up pending financial business, particularly during the grueling Budget session.
- Bypassing Crucial Discussion: At the pre-determined time on the last day allotted for the budget discussion, the Speaker applies the guillotine, and all ongoing debates are instantly terminated.
- En Masse Voting: Every single remaining, completely undiscussed demand for grant is grouped together and immediately put to vote to ensure the government securely obtains vital authorization for its expenditure.
π Official Language β’ Acts
Q.17) The Constitution originally provided that the official language of the Union would be Hindi, but English would continue for a period of 15 years. Which Act allowed the continued use of English indefinitely?
Ans > Official Languages Act, 1963
- The Constitutional Compromise: Article 343 officially declared Hindi as the sole official language but permitted the continued use of English for all official purposes for a strictly transitional period of 15 years (until 1965).
- Mounting Linguistic Tensions: As the 1965 deadline approached, severe linguistic riots erupted in non-Hindi speaking states (particularly Tamil Nadu) driven by fears of Hindi cultural imposition and administrative disadvantages.
- Legislative Assurance: To quell unrest, Parliament enacted the Official Languages Act of 1963, providing that English “may” continue to be used indefinitely. A subsequent 1967 amendment strengthened this considerably.
π Centre-State Relations β’ Trade & Commerce
Q.18) Article 301 guarantees freedom of trade and commerce. However, under Article 304(a), a State Legislature can impose taxes on goods imported from other states, provided that:
Ans > Similar goods manufactured or produced within the state are subject to the same tax (preventing discrimination)
- Balancing Trade and Federal Autonomy: Article 301 aims to create a unified national market by making trade free throughout India. However, Article 304(a) allows states to generate revenue by taxing imported commercial goods.
- The Anti-Discrimination Clause: The critical constitutional safeguard embedded here is the strict prevention of economic protectionism. A state cannot use entry taxes to unfairly shield its own local industries from inter-state competition.
- Strict Requirement of Parity: A state can legally tax imported goods only if it concurrently imposes the exact same tax burden on similar goods manufactured or produced within its own borders.
π Centre-State Relations β’ Trade & Commerce
Q.19) Article 302 empowers the Parliament to impose restrictions on the freedom of trade and commerce between states. What is the constitutional justification required for imposing such restrictions?
Ans > Public Interest
- Overriding Free Trade Norms: While the Constitution strongly champions a seamless national market, it acknowledges that the central government must possess overriding authority to intervene decisively during extraordinary circumstances via Article 302.
- The “Public Interest” Benchmark: The sole constitutional justification required is “public interest,” broadly defined to allow the federal government to act swiftly for the greater economic good or security of the nation.
- Practical Regulatory Applications: Parliament frequently uses this power to enact vital regulatory laws, such as the Essential Commodities Act, allowing the center to strictly control the distribution of crucial items like food grains or essential drugs.
π Centre-State Relations β’ Trade & Commerce
Q.20) While Parliament can restrict inter-state trade in the public interest, Article 303 prohibits Parliament and State Legislatures from making laws that give preference to one State over another. What is the ONLY exception that allows Parliament to discriminate between states in this regard?
Ans > To address a situation arising from the scarcity of goods in any part of India
- The Strict Rule Against Preference: Article 303 strictly limits the broad powers granted under Article 302, emphatically prohibiting laws that give an economic preference to one state over another, thereby maintaining crucial federal equality.
- The Scarcity Exception: The Constitution provides exactly one pragmatic exception. Under Article 303(2), Parliament is legally permitted to discriminate between states ONLY to address a dire situation arising from a severe “scarcity of goods”.
- Emergency Crisis Management: This practically means if a famine hits a specific region, Parliament can pass laws prioritizing the movement of essential goods exclusively to that drought-hit state, temporarily denying logistical advantages to unaffected states.
π Judiciary & Admin β’ Supreme Court Cases
Q.21) In the T.S.R. Subramanian v. Union of India (2013) case, the Supreme Court issued a landmark directive to insulate the bureaucracy from political pressure. What was the key directive?
Ans > Civil servants must record all oral instructions/orders from political bosses in writing.
- Combating Politicization: A PIL led by former Cabinet Secretary T.S.R. Subramanian highlighted how arbitrary transfers and undocumented oral instructions were actively destroying the political neutrality and morale of civil services.
- The Mandate for Written Orders: The Supreme Court legally mandated that bureaucrats immediately record all oral instructions from political bosses, aiming to establish a paper trail of accountability and protect honest officers from being scapegoated.
- Institutionalizing Bureaucratic Transfers: The judgment also directed the mandatory constitution of independent Civil Services Boards (CSBs) at both national and state levels to guide executive decisions regarding transfers and postings.
π Judiciary & Admin β’ Supreme Court Cases
Q.22) In the A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969) case, the Supreme Court firmly established a fundamental principle of administrative law, ruling that:
Ans > The principles of natural justice apply to administrative proceedings, not just judicial ones (especially the rule against bias)
- Blurring Judicial and Administrative Lines: Previously, Indian law rigidly distinguished between quasi-judicial functions (requiring natural justice) and purely administrative functions, granting administrative authorities vast discretionary power without strict procedural safeguards.
- The Rule Against Bias: The case arose when a candidate sat on a selection board that was concurrently considering his own name for a position in the Indian Forest Service, a glaring conflict of interest.
- Universal Application of Natural Justice: The Court profoundly ruled that the core principles of natural justiceβspecifically the strict rule against bias (nemo judex in causa sua)βapply equally to administrative proceedings that have civil consequences.
π Tribunals β’ Article 323A
Q.23) Under Article 323A, Administrative Tribunals are established by Parliament to adjudicate disputes regarding recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services. Who holds the EXCLUSIVE power to establish these tribunals?
Ans > Parliament only
- Speedy Resolution for Civil Servants: Article 323A was specifically inserted by the 42nd Amendment Act in 1976. Its goal was to drastically reduce the burden on High Courts by creating specialized forums for service-related litigation.
- Strict Parliamentary Monopoly: The Constitution deliberately grants the EXCLUSIVE legislative power to establish Administrative Tribunals under Article 323A to the Union Parliament. State legislatures have absolutely no constitutional legislative competence for this.
- The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985: Utilizing this exclusive mandate, Parliament passed the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, establishing the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and allowing for State Administrative Tribunals (SATs) only upon state requests.
π Tribunals β’ Article 323B
Q.24) In contrast, under Article 323B (Tribunals for other matters like taxation, foreign exchange, land reforms), who is empowered to establish such tribunals?
Ans > Both Parliament and State Legislatures (with respect to matters falling within their legislative competence)
- Broadening the Tribunal System: While Article 323A is strictly focused on public service employment, Article 323B casts a wider net, explicitly permitting tribunals for complex subjects like taxation, land reforms, and food rationing.
- Shared Legislative Power: In stark contrast to the absolute central monopoly in 323A, the constitutional power to establish tribunals under Article 323B is fundamentally shared between the Union Parliament and individual State Legislatures.
- Strict Subject Matter Jurisdiction: They can only establish tribunals for matters that legally fall within their respective legislative competence as defined by the Seventh Schedule (e.g., state for land reforms, Parliament for foreign exchange).
π Amendment β’ Part XX
Q.25) Which Part of the Constitution, consisting of only one Article (Article 368), deals with the Amendment of the Constitution?
Ans > Part XX
- A Dedicated Constitutional Framework: The framers recognized the need for a living document that could adapt to changing times without a chaotic overhaul. They dedicated an entire section, Part XX, exclusively to the amendment process.
- The Solitary Article Setup: Part XX is highly unique because it contains only a single article: Article 368. This article provides a comprehensive legal mechanism and rigid procedures for constitutional amendments.
- Balancing Rigidity and Flexibility: The procedures strike a complex balance: minor parts via simple majority, most via special majority, and entrenched federal features additionally requiring ratification by half of all state legislatures.
π Amendment β’ Procedure
Q.26) According to Article 368, an amendment of the Constitution can be initiated only by the introduction of a bill in:
Ans > Either House of Parliament
- Strict Parliamentary Exclusivity: The power to formally amend the text of the Indian Constitution is heavily centralized. The process can be initiated strictly by introducing a bill in either the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha.
- State Legislatures Completely Barred: State Legislatures hold absolutely no constitutional power to initiate a constitutional amendment. They cannot draft, introduce, or debate a constitutional amendment bill on their own floor.
- The Minor Exception of Article 169: A state assembly can pass a resolution requesting the creation or abolition of its own Legislative Council, but the actual legal enactment amending the Constitution must still be carried out by Parliament.
π Amendment β’ President’s Role
Q.27) Does a Constitutional Amendment Bill require the prior recommendation of the President before introduction in Parliament?
Ans > No, it does not require prior recommendation
- Minimizing Executive Hurdles: Unlike certain financial bills or bills radically altering state boundaries, a Constitutional Amendment Bill does NOT require the prior recommendation or permission of the President before being introduced.
- Equal Rights for Government and Private Members: The amendment bill can be formally introduced by a Cabinet Minister acting for the government or independently by any Private Member, ensuring constitutional debates can be triggered organically.
- The Obligation of Presidential Assent: Following the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1971, once the bill is passed by both Houses, it is absolutely mandatory for the President to give their formal assent. They cannot veto it.
π Amendment β’ Disagreements
Q.28) If there is a disagreement between the two Houses of Parliament over a Constitutional Amendment Bill, what is the constitutional mechanism to resolve it?
Ans > There is no provision for a joint sitting; the bill simply fails
- Absolute Bicameral Equality: For amending the Constitution, the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha possess absolutely equal, symmetrical legislative powers. A Bill must be passed by each House separately by a strict special majority.
- No Dispute Resolution Mechanism: If the two Houses fundamentally disagree on the bill, there is absolutely no constitutional mechanism designed to break the legislative deadlock.
- Total Absence of Joint Sittings: Crucially, the constitutional provision for a joint sitting of Parliament (Article 108), which resolves deadlocks over ordinary legislation, explicitly does NOT apply to Constitutional Amendment Bills. The bill simply fails.
π Prime Ministers β’ Historical Facts
Q.29) Which of the following Prime Ministers of India never faced the Lok Sabha during their tenure?
Ans > Charan Singh
- Political Instability of the Late 70s: Chaudhary Charan Singh’s incredibly brief tenure perfectly highlights the chaotic political fragmentation following the Emergency. After the collapse of Morarji Desai’s government in 1979, Charan Singh was appointed Prime Minister.
- The Strict Condition of Appointment: President Neelam Sanjiva Reddy appointed him on the strict condition that he must successfully prove his majority on the floor of the Lok Sabha within a specified, short timeframe.
- Resignation Before the Crucial Vote: Just a single day before the Lok Sabha was scheduled to formally convene for the crucial vote of confidence in August 1979, the Congress (I) party abruptly withdrew its vital support. Lacking numbers, he resigned without ever facing Parliament.
π Official Language β’ Directives
Q.30) Which Article of the Constitution dictates that it shall be the duty of the Union to promote the spread of the Hindi language and to develop it so that it may serve as a medium of expression for all the elements of the composite culture of India?
Ans > Article 351
- The Ultimate Linguistic Directive: The final article in Part XVII, Article 351, serves as a specific “Directive for development of the Hindi language,” placing a proactive, ongoing constitutional obligation directly on the Union government.
- Cultural Assimilation, Not Imposition: It directs the Union to actively promote Hindi not by aggressively overriding other languages, but by developing it to serve as a unifying medium of expression for “all the elements of the composite culture of India.”
- Guidelines for Vocabulary Sourcing: The Article directs that Hindi should secure its enrichment by assimilating forms, style, and expressions used in Hindustani and other scheduled languages, drawing primarily on Sanskrit for expanding its vocabulary.
π Quick Summary β Polity Set 187
- NCBC: Constitutional status via 102nd Amendment, but administratively under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.
- NCST: Conditions of service and tenure are determined directly by the President by rule.
- Panchayat Tenure: A prematurely elected Panchayat serves only for the remainder of the dissolved Panchayat’s 5-year term.
- PESA Act: Grants the Gram Sabha specific powers to enforce prohibition or regulate the sale of intoxicants.
- Legislative Councils (Art 169): Created or abolished by Parliament using a simple majority (not an Art 368 amendment).
- Legislative Council Size: Maximum one-third of the State Assembly, with a strict minimum floor of 40 members.
- Presidential Elections: The Returning Officer alternates between the Secretary-General of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.
- Void Elections: If the Supreme Court voids a President’s election, their prior acts remain valid and binding.
- Cabinet: The term “Cabinet” was introduced into the Constitution solely by the 44th Amendment Act.
- Council vs Cabinet: The Council is the larger 60-70 member body, whereas the Cabinet is a powerful 15-20 member core group.
- Prime Minister Duties: Under Art 78, the PM is constitutionally bound to communicate all Cabinet decisions to the President.
- Closure Motion: Used to abruptly cut short parliamentary debates and force an immediate vote.
- Simple Closure: The standard motion stating the “matter having been sufficiently discussed be now put to vote.”
- Closure by Compartments: Grouping clauses of lengthy bills into thematic blocks to be debated and voted on as whole parts.
- Kangaroo Closure: Skipping intervening clauses and presuming them passed, while actively debating only the most vital ones.
- Guillotine Closure: Grouping remaining undiscussed demands on the final day and voting en masse without debate due to lack of time.
- Official Language: The Official Languages Act of 1963 allowed the continued use of English indefinitely past the 15-year mark.
- State Taxation: Under Art 304(a), states can tax imported goods only if identical taxes apply to locally produced similar goods.
- Trade Restrictions: Parliament can restrict inter-state trade purely on the grounds of “Public Interest” (Article 302).
- State Preference: Parliament can only discriminate between states to manage a severe “scarcity of goods” (Article 303).
- T.S.R. Subramanian Case: Directed that civil servants must record oral instructions from political bosses in writing.
- A.K. Kraipak Case: Established that natural justice (rule against bias) applies strictly to administrative actions with civil consequences.
- Central Admin Tribunals: Under Article 323A, EXCLUSIVELY the Union Parliament can establish service tribunals.
- Other Tribunals: Under Article 323B, BOTH Parliament and State Legislatures can establish tribunals based on their legislative competence.
- Amendment Section: The solitary Part XX (Article 368) governs the constitutional amendment process.
- Initiating Amendments: Constitutional amendment bills can strictly be initiated in either House of Parliament (not state assemblies).
- Prior Recommendation: Amendment bills absolutely do NOT require the President’s prior recommendation to be introduced.
- Legislative Deadlocks: There are no joint sittings for Amendment bills; if the Houses disagree, the bill simply fails.
- Prime Ministers: Charan Singh is the only Indian Prime Minister to resign without ever facing the Lok Sabha.
- Hindi Directive: Article 351 places a constitutional duty on the Union to aggressively promote and develop the Hindi language.
Timer β³
30:00
Progress (0/30)
Click any card to flip and reveal the summarized answer!
Smart Review: Questions you got wrong appear here for focused study.