Polity Set 160
🔍
📌 Executive • Union Government
Q.1) The term “Cabinet” was originally absent from the Constitution. It was inserted into Article 352 by the 44th Amendment Act. How is the “Cabinet” defined in that Article?
Ans > The Council consisting of the Prime Minister and other Ministers of Cabinet rank appointed under Article 75
- The Original Constitutional Stance: When the Constitution of India was adopted in 1950, the word “Cabinet” was completely absent from the text. The original drafters relied on the broader term “Council of Ministers” under Article 74 and Article 75 to describe the body advising the President.
- The 44th Amendment Act of 1978: The insertion of the word “Cabinet” into the Constitution happened as a direct reaction to the National Emergency declared in 1975. The 44th Amendment modified Article 352 to ensure that the President could only proclaim an emergency upon receiving formal, written advice from the Cabinet.
- Legal Definition under Article 352: Article 352 defines the Cabinet specifically for the context of declaring emergencies. It explicitly states that the Cabinet consists of the Prime Minister and other Ministers of Cabinet rank appointed under Article 75, formally distinguishing them from Ministers of State and Deputy Ministers.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Minorities
Q.2) Is the term “Minority” explicitly defined anywhere in the Constitution of India?
Ans > No, the term is used but not defined in the Constitution
- Constitutional Usage without Definition: The Constitution uses the term “minority” in several places, most notably in Articles 29 and 30, dealing with cultural and educational rights. However, the drafters deliberately avoided providing a strict, rigid definition.
- Basis of Minority Status: While undefined, the Constitution explicitly recognizes only two grounds for determining minority status: religion and language (Article 30). The Central Government later notified specific communities as minorities under the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992.
- Judicial Interpretation: Because a formal definition is missing, the Supreme Court has stepped in. In cases like the TMA Pai Foundation case, the Court established that minority status must be determined at the state level based on state demographics, rather than at the national level.
📌 Preamble • Ideals
Q.3) The Preamble to the Indian Constitution secures to all its citizens three types of Justice. What are they?
Ans > Social, Economic, and Political
- The Concept of Comprehensive Justice: Influenced by the Russian Revolution, the Preamble promises Justice in three distinct dimensions—social, economic, and political—ensuring a holistic approach to citizen welfare beyond mere legal fairness.
- Social and Economic Justice: Social justice entails equal treatment without distinction based on caste, color, religion, or sex. Economic justice strives to eliminate inequalities in wealth and income. Together, they form “Distributive Justice.”
- Political Justice: Guarantees all citizens equal, free, and fair political rights and access to political offices, practically realized through universal adult franchise (Article 326).
📌 Preamble • Ideals
Q.4) The Preamble secures to all citizens five types of Liberty. They are the Liberty of:
Ans > Thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship
- The Essence of Democratic Liberty: The Preamble secures five specific types of liberty: thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship. These are essential for intellectual, moral, and spiritual development, drawing inspiration from the French Revolution.
- Enforcement through Fundamental Rights: These liberties are legally enforceable via Part III of the Constitution. Article 19 guarantees freedom of speech, while Articles 25 to 28 guarantee the freedom of religion.
- Reasonable Restrictions: Liberty is not absolute. They must be exercised within constitutional limits, and the State can impose “reasonable restrictions” on grounds like public order, morality, and national sovereignty.
📌 Preamble • Ideals
Q.5) The Preamble secures two types of Equality. They are Equality of:
Ans > Status and Opportunity
- Eliminating Historical Discrimination: “Equality of Status and Opportunity” is a deliberate response to India’s historical context of caste and social stratification, aiming to create a level playing field.
- Three Dimensions of Equality: Civic equality is upheld by Articles 14-18 (equality before law, abolition of untouchability). Political equality is secured by Articles 325 and 326 (adult suffrage).
- Economic Dimension: Economic equality is promoted heavily through the Directive Principles of State Policy, which direct the state to ensure equal right to livelihood and equal pay for equal work.
📌 Constitution Structure • Parts
Q.6) Which Part of the Constitution deals with “Co-operative Societies”?
Ans > Part IX-B
- The 97th Amendment Act, 2011: Part IX-B was not part of the original Constitution but was introduced by the 97th Amendment to ensure co-operative societies function democratically and professionally.
- Elevation to Fundamental Right: The amendment elevated the right to form co-operative societies to a Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(c) and added a new DPSP (Article 43B) for their promotion.
- State Subject Framework: While “Co-operative Societies” is a State subject (Entry 32, State List), Part IX-B provides a uniform, baseline legal framework that state laws must strictly conform to.
📌 Co-operative Societies • Governance
Q.7) Under Part IX-B (Article 243ZJ), what is the maximum number of directors prescribed for the board of a co-operative society?
Ans > 21
- Standardizing Board Structures: Article 243ZJ was introduced to bring uniformity and administrative efficiency by mandating a statutory cap on the absolute size of the board of directors.
- The Maximum Limit of 21: State legislatures make laws regarding the number of directors, but the Constitution strictly mandates that this number shall not exceed twenty-one to ensure compactness and decisive management.
- Mandatory Social Reservations: Within this 21-member limit, Article 243ZJ explicitly mandates the reservation of one seat for SC/STs and two seats for women, ensuring social inclusion.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Exceptions
Q.8) Which Article empowers the Parliament to restrict or abrogate the Fundamental Rights of persons employed in intelligence or counter-intelligence organizations?
Ans > Article 33
- Balancing Discipline and Fundamental Rights: Article 33 strikes a balance between individual freedoms and national security, empowering Parliament to restrict rights of armed forces, police, and intelligence agencies to maintain absolute discipline.
- Exclusive Legislative Power of Parliament: The power to make these restrictive laws is vested exclusively in Parliament, ensuring a uniform disciplinary code across the entire country regardless of state operations.
- Scope Reaches Beyond Combatants: This applies expansively, legally including non-combatant civilian employees working within these organizations (like administrative staff and mechanics) as they are integral to the forces.
📌 Non-Constitutional Bodies • NITI Aayog
Q.9) In 1950, the Planning Commission was established by an executive resolution. In 2015, NITI Aayog replaced it. Who is the ex-officio Chairperson of NITI Aayog?
Ans > The Prime Minister
- Transition from Planning Commission: Recognizing the need for a modern, cooperative approach, the Government abolished the Planning Commission and replaced it with NITI Aayog on January 1, 2015.
- The Ex-officio Chairperson Role: The Prime Minister serves as its ex-officio Chairperson, giving the institution the political weight required to drive national development agendas and foster cooperative federalism.
- Role and Composition Changes: Operating as a premier policy “think tank”, its Governing Council actively includes all State Chief Ministers and Lt. Governors, involving states as equal partners in policy-making.
📌 DPSP • Welfare State
Q.10) The concept of a “Welfare State” in the Indian Constitution is most clearly reflected in the:
Ans > Directive Principles of State Policy
- The Philosophical Core of Part IV: The DPSPs embody the philosophical concept of a modern “Welfare State”, actively seeking to promote the social, educational, and economic well-being of citizens, unlike a colonial police state.
- Establishing Socio-Economic Democracy: Designed to establish social and economic democracy, the DPSPs are a socio-economic manifesto aiming to address issues like poverty and unequal wealth distribution.
- Non-Justiciable but Fundamental: Although non-justiciable (Article 37), they are declared “fundamental in the governance of the country,” placing a moral obligation on the state to apply them when drafting laws.
📌 Statutory Bodies • Lokpal
Q.11) The institution of the “Lokpal” looks into allegations of corruption against public functionaries. Who was the driving force behind the drafting of the Jan Lokpal Bill, leading to the 2011 anti-corruption movement?
Ans > Anna Hazare
- The Decades-Long Demand: The concept of an independent ombudsman (Lokpal) was first proposed in the 1960s, but deep political consensus was never reached for decades.
- India Against Corruption Movement: In 2011, veteran activist Anna Hazare launched a massive nationwide grassroots movement using Gandhian methods to demand a robust anti-corruption law.
- The Alternative Jan Lokpal Draft: The movement demanded the strict “Jan Lokpal Bill” drafted by civil society activists over the government’s diluted version. Sustained pressure eventually forced Parliament to pass the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act in 2013.
📌 Constitutional Bodies • Finance Commission
Q.12) Article 280 requires the President to constitute a Finance Commission. How frequently must this Commission be constituted?
Ans > Every 5 years, or earlier if the President considers it necessary
- Constitutional Mandate under Article 280: The President constitutes it at the expiration of every fifth year, or earlier if necessary. It addresses vertical and horizontal fiscal imbalances in the federal structure.
- Core Functions regarding Devolution: Its absolute primary duty is to recommend the distribution of net proceeds of central taxes between the Union and the States, and allocation among the States.
- Grants-in-Aid and Local Body Funding: It advises on principles for grants-in-aid to states and recommends measures to augment state consolidated funds to supplement rural Panchayats and urban Municipalities.
📌 Election Commission • Local Bodies
Q.13) Article 324 vests the superintendence, direction, and control of elections in an Election Commission. Does this include the elections to the Panchayats and Municipalities?
Ans > No, local elections are conducted by the State Election Commissions (under Article 243K)
- Strict Jurisdiction of the ECI: The Election Commission of India (ECI) exclusively conducts national and state-level elections (Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, State Assemblies, President, and Vice-President).
- Decentralization: The 73rd and 74th Amendments created a third tier of local self-government. To avoid overburdening the ECI, separate electoral authorities were mandated.
- State Election Commissions: Under Article 243K and 243ZA, legally independent State Election Commissions possess the exclusive power to conduct all local elections within that specific state.
📌 Parliament • Membership
Q.14) A person cannot be a member of both Parliament and a State Legislature simultaneously. If a person is elected to both, what happens?
Ans > Their seat in Parliament becomes vacant if they do not resign their seat in the State Legislature within a period specified by the President’s rules (14 days)
- Prohibition of Simultaneous Membership: Article 101 strictly forbids an individual from serving in multiple legislative bodies at the same time to prevent concentration of power.
- The 14-Day Grace Period Rule: Defined by the Prohibition of Simultaneous Membership Rules, 1950. The elected member has a strict grace period of 14 days to formally resign from one seat.
- Automatic Consequence: If they fail to resign from the State Legislature seat within 14 days, their seat in the Parliament automatically and irreversibly becomes vacant.
📌 Parliament • Multiple Seats
Q.15) If a person is elected to two seats in the Lok Sabha (e.g., from two different constituencies), they must resign from one seat within how many days, failing which both seats become vacant?
Ans > 14 days
- Contesting Multiple Constituencies: The Representation of the People Act, 1951, allows a candidate to contest from a maximum of two constituencies simultaneously.
- The Strict Statutory Choice Period: If they win both seats, they must submit their formal resignation from one of the seats within a strict statutory timeframe of 14 days.
- Severe Penalty for Defaulting: If no choice is made within 14 days, both seats automatically fall vacant, heavily penalizing indecision and triggering costly by-elections.
📌 State Legislature • Legislative Council
Q.16) The Constitution originally provided that the total number of members in the Legislative Council of a State shall not exceed one-fourth of the total number of members in the Legislative Assembly. This maximum limit was raised to one-third by which Amendment Act?
Ans > 7th Amendment Act (1956)
- Bicameral State Legislatures: Article 169 explicitly allows states to create or abolish a Legislative Council (Vidhan Parishad), the upper house.
- Original Constitutional Cap Limits: The original text strictly dictated that the Council’s size could not exceed one-fourth (25%) of the Legislative Assembly to prevent it from rivaling the elected lower house.
- The 7th Amendment Act Necessity: After the linguistic reorganization of states in 1956 shrank assembly sizes, the 7th Amendment raised the maximum limit to one-third (33.33%) to ensure Councils remained adequately representative.
📌 Landmark Judgments • Fundamental Rights
Q.17) The I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab case (1967) is historic because the Supreme Court ruled that:
Ans > Parliament cannot amend the Fundamental Rights
- The Core Constitutional Battle: The central legal battle involved Parliament’s vast power to amend the Constitution (Article 368) versus the sanctity of Fundamental Rights, particularly the right to property.
- Dramatic Reversal of Precedent: Reversing earlier stances, an 11-judge bench in Golaknath (1967) stunningly ruled (6:5 majority) that Fundamental Rights possess a “transcendental and immutable” position.
- The Ruling’s Impact: The Court declared that a constitutional amendment is an ordinary “law” under Article 13, completely restricting Parliament from taking away Fundamental Rights. This led to the 24th Amendment and eventually the Kesavananda Bharati case.
📌 Center-State Relations • Legislative
Q.18) The “Doctrine of Territorial Nexus” essentially means that laws made by a State Legislature:
Ans > Can have extra-territorial operation if there is a sufficient legal nexus (connection) between the state and the object/person outside the state
- Federal Distribution of Legislative Power: Article 245 states a State Legislature can strictly only make laws for its specific state’s territory, while Parliament can make laws for the whole of India with extra-territorial reach.
- Judicial Exception: The “Doctrine of Territorial Nexus” is an exception, allowing a state law to validly operate outside its borders under very specific legal conditions.
- Establishing the Nexus: The state must prove a legitimate, real, and sufficient connection between the state and the external object/person, and that the liability imposed relates directly to that connection (often invoked in taxation).
📌 Fundamental Rights • Directive Principles
Q.19) Article 31C was inserted by the 25th Amendment Act to protect laws implementing certain Directive Principles. The 42nd Amendment Act attempted to expand this protection to ALL Directive Principles. In which case did the Supreme Court strike down this expansion, restoring the protection to only Articles 39(b) and (c)?
Ans > Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)
- Evolution of Article 31C: Initially protecting only Articles 39(b) and 39(c), the 42nd Amendment drastically expanded Article 31C to protect laws implementing ANY Directive Principle from Fundamental Rights challenges.
- Constitutional Danger: This expansion threatened civil liberties by making non-justiciable Part IV legally superior to justiciable Part III, bypassing judicial scrutiny entirely.
- Supreme Court’s Intervention: In Minerva Mills (1980), the Court struck down this specific expansion, declaring that the Constitution rests on the “bedrock of balance” between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles; destroying this balance destroys the Basic Structure.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Property
Q.20) The Right to Property (Article 300A) is no longer a Fundamental Right, but it remains a Constitutional Right. Can a person invoke Article 32 (writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court) directly to enforce the Right to Property?
Ans > No, because Article 32 is strictly for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights (Part III)
- Original Stance: Initially, property was a strong Fundamental Right under Articles 19(1)(f) and 31, acting as a major hurdle to socialist land reform.
- 44th Amendment Act, 1978: This amendment deleted Articles 19(1)(f) and 31 from Part III, effectively stripping the right to property of its Fundamental Right status.
- Current Status: Inserted as Article 300A, it is a constitutional right outside Part III. Therefore, a citizen cannot directly invoke Article 32 in the Supreme Court to enforce it, but must use High Courts (Article 226) or civil courts.
📌 Judiciary • Supreme Court
Q.21) In India, who acts as the ultimate custodian and guardian of the Constitution?
Ans > The Supreme Court of India
- Role in a Federal Democracy: The Constitution explicitly assigns the Supreme Court as the highest court of appeal, resolving center-state disputes and acting as the ultimate interpreter and custodian of the document.
- Judicial Review: It exercises this authority by reviewing legislative acts and executive orders, declaring them null and void (ultra vires) if they violate constitutional provisions.
- Protector of Fundamental Rights: Under Article 32, citizens have the right to approach the Supreme Court directly to enforce Fundamental Rights, making the Court the ultimate defender of civil liberty.
📌 Constitutional Amendment • Procedure
Q.22) Which Constitutional Amendment is required to alter the representation of States in Parliament (Schedule IV)?
Ans > Special majority of Parliament AND ratification by the legislatures of at least one-half of the States
- Three Categories of Amendment: Article 368 outlines three amendment procedures: simple majority, special majority, and special majority plus formal state ratification.
- Protecting Federal Structure: The third, most rigid category protects the federal framework. Structural changes deeply affecting state powers or representation cannot be passed unilaterally by the Center.
- Strict Ratification Requirement: Altering Schedule IV (State representation in Parliament) specifically requires a Special Majority in both Houses PLUS formal ratification by at least one-half of state legislatures via simple majority.
📌 Center-State Finances • Grants
Q.23) Which body advises the President on the principles that should govern the grants-in-aid of the revenues of the States out of the Consolidated Fund of India?
Ans > Finance Commission
- Addressing Fiscal Imbalance: The Finance Commission bridges the structural vertical fiscal imbalance where the Center collects most revenue while States handle heavy expenditure responsibilities.
- Statutory vs. Discretionary Grants: Statutory Grants (Article 275) are mandated for states in genuine need, unlike purely politically driven discretionary grants.
- Guiding Principles: The Finance Commission acts as the impartial expert body that formulates the specific mathematical formulas determining how these grants-in-aid are distributed from the Consolidated Fund of India equitably.
📌 Constitution Structure • Parts
Q.24) Which Part of the Constitution deals with the Official Language of the Union and the States?
Ans > Part XVII
- A Sensitive Compromise: Resolving the national language issue was highly explosive during the Constituent Assembly. The final “Munshi-Ayyangar formula” became the definitive compromise.
- Scope of Part XVII: Detailed in Part XVII (Articles 343 to 351), it is divided into chapters covering the Union Language, Regional Languages, Judiciary Languages, and Special Directives.
- Union and State Mandates: Article 343 declares Hindi (Devanagari script) the Union’s official language while allowing English usage initially. Article 345 empowers states to adopt regional languages for internal administration.
📌 Emergency Provisions • National Emergency
Q.25) A Proclamation of Emergency under Article 352 must be laid before each House of Parliament and ceases to operate at the expiration of one month unless approved by both Houses. If the Lok Sabha is dissolved during this one month, the proclamation survives until:
Ans > 30 days from the first sitting of the reconstituted Lok Sabha (provided the Rajya Sabha has approved it)
- Strict Parliamentary Control: To prevent dictatorial abuse of emergency powers, Article 352 mandates rigorous scrutiny and formal approval of the proclamation by both Houses of Parliament.
- The Tighter One-Month Deadline: The 44th Amendment Act drastically reduced the timeframe for initial approval from two months to just one month, after which the emergency automatically ceases if unapproved.
- Dissolution Scenario Protocol: If Lok Sabha dissolves during this window, the Rajya Sabha must approve it. The proclamation then survives until exactly 30 days from the first sitting of the newly reconstituted Lok Sabha, otherwise it lapses.
📌 Center-State Relations • Governor
Q.26) The Sarkaria Commission strongly recommended that the Governor of a State should be:
Ans > An eminent person from outside the State, detached from local politics
- Partisan Governors Issue: Historically, Governors have been a major friction point between the Center and States, often accused of acting as partisan agents of the ruling central party.
- Sarkaria Commission (1983-88): This high-profile commission conducted an exhaustive review of India’s federal structure and Center-State relations.
- Appointment Standards: It explicitly recommended that Governors must be eminent figures from outside the state, highly detached from local politics, and not intimately connected with active partisan politics recently, ensuring absolute neutrality.
📌 Judiciary • Independence
Q.27) The concept of an “Independent Judiciary” in India guarantees that:
Ans > The judiciary is free from the control of the executive and the legislature
- Separation of Powers: An absolutely Independent Judiciary rests on the doctrine of separation of powers, keeping the judicial branch structurally and functionally isolated from lawmakers and the government.
- Protection from Interference: This guarantees judges adjudicate sensitive disputes without political pressure, fear, or favor. The executive cannot direct rulings, and parliament cannot casually intimidate judges.
- Robust Safeguards: Independence is secured through mechanisms like ironclad security of tenure, difficult parliamentary impeachment processes, salary protection charged to the Consolidated Fund, and powers to punish for contempt.
📌 Tribunals • Procedure
Q.28) Article 323A empowers Parliament to establish Administrative Tribunals. These tribunals are bound by the strict rules of the Civil Procedure Code (1908) and the Indian Evidence Act (1872). True or False?
Ans > False, they are not bound by these strict rules and are guided by the principles of natural justice.
- Urgent Need for Specialized Bodies: Introduced via the 42nd Amendment (Article 323A) to unburden traditional courts and provide speedy, inexpensive justice for public servant employment disputes.
- Flexibility Over Rigid Procedure: A defining characteristic of these tribunals is that they are explicitly freed from the highly complex, time-consuming rules of the Civil Procedure Code and Indian Evidence Act.
- Principles of Natural Justice: Instead, they operate on broad principles of natural justice—ensuring fairness, providing reasonable opportunity to be heard, and acting without bias—allowing for faster dispute resolution.
📌 Constitutional Principles • Rule of Law
Q.29) What is the fundamental essence of the “Rule of Law”?
Ans > The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and no one, including the government, is above the law
- Core Definition: The Rule of Law dictates that society must be governed exclusively by established legal principles, never by the arbitrary whims or caprices of people in power.
- Supremacy of the Constitution: In India, it means the written Constitution is supreme, and every entity—from the Prime Minister to the poorest citizen—is equally subject to the exact same legal codes.
- Protection Against Tyranny: It ensures executive authority operates strictly within valid legal boundaries, embedded fundamentally in Article 14 (Equality before the law).
📌 Fundamental Rights • Judicial Review
Q.30) Finally, which Article definitively declares that the Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land and all laws inconsistent with Fundamental Rights are void?
Ans > Article 13
- Absolute Bedrock of Judicial Review: Article 13 is the primary constitutional mechanism establishing the doctrine of judicial review, giving the higher judiciary the mandate to rigorously scrutinize state actions.
- Uncompromising Protection of Part III: It explicitly declares that any law (ordinance, order, regulation, etc.) inconsistent with Fundamental Rights (Part III) shall be void to the extent of the inconsistency.
- Pre and Post-Constitutional Reach: Applies heavily to both post-constitutional new laws and pre-constitutional colonial statutes, ensuring absolute constitutional supremacy above all historical laws.
📌 Quick Summary — Polity Set 160
- Cabinet Definition: Inserted in Article 352 by the 44th Amendment Act.
- Minority Status: The term is used but not explicitly defined in the Constitution.
- Preamble Justice: Secures Social, Economic, and Political justice.
- Preamble Liberty: Secures liberty of Thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship.
- Preamble Equality: Secures equality of Status and Opportunity.
- Co-operative Societies: Dealt with in Part IX-B of the Constitution.
- Co-op Directors: Maximum number of directors is capped at 21 under Art 243ZJ.
- Intelligence Forces Rights: Article 33 empowers Parliament to restrict their Fundamental Rights.
- NITI Aayog Head: The Prime Minister is the ex-officio Chairperson.
- Welfare State: Concept is most clearly reflected in the Directive Principles of State Policy.
- Lokpal Movement: Anna Hazare was the driving force behind the 2011 Jan Lokpal Bill movement.
- Finance Commission: Constituted every 5 years (or earlier) to recommend tax devolution.
- Local Elections: Conducted strictly by State Election Commissions, not the ECI.
- Dual Membership: A member elected to both Parliament and State Leg. has 14 days to resign state seat.
- Two LS Seats: Winning candidate must resign one seat within 14 days.
- Legislative Council Cap: Raised to one-third of the Assembly by the 7th Amendment Act (1956).
- Golaknath Case (1967): Historic ruling that Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights.
- Territorial Nexus: Allows state laws extra-territorial operation given sufficient legal connection.
- Minerva Mills (1980): Struck down blanket primacy of all DPSPs over Fundamental Rights.
- Right to Property: Now Article 300A; cannot be directly enforced via Article 32.
- Constitutional Guardian: The Supreme Court acts as the ultimate custodian of the Constitution.
- Schedule IV Amendments: Requires Special Majority AND ratification by half the States.
- Grants-in-Aid Advice: Provided by the Finance Commission to the President.
- Official Language: Covered extensively in Part XVII of the Constitution.
- Emergency Dissolution: Proclamation survives until 30 days from the reconstituted Lok Sabha’s first sitting.
- Governor Appointment: Sarkaria Commission advised picking eminent non-local persons detached from politics.
- Independent Judiciary: Guarantees the judiciary is completely free from executive/legislative control.
- Admin Tribunals: Article 323A bodies are guided by natural justice, not rigid civil codes.
- Rule of Law: Asserts that the Constitution is supreme and absolutely no one is above it.
- Article 13: Definitively declares laws inconsistent with Fundamental Rights as legally void.
Timer ⏳
15:00
Progress (0/30)
Click any card to flip and reveal the summarized answer!
Smart Review: Questions you got wrong appear here for focused study.