Modern History Set 149
🔍
📌 Freedom Struggle • Gandhi Era
Q.1) Mahatma Gandhi returned to India permanently from South Africa on January 9, 1915. This day is now officially celebrated in India as what?
Ans > Pravasi Bharatiya Divas
- Historical Return Context: After spending 21 highly transformative years in South Africa (1893-1914), Mahatma Gandhi permanently returned to India on January 9, 1915. He returned at the persistent request of his respected political guru, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, who urged him to lead the Indian national movement.
- Formative Years Abroad: During his time in South Africa, Gandhi successfully developed and meticulously tested his powerful political weapon of Satyagraha (truth-force) against deeply entrenched racial discrimination. He had successfully established the Natal Indian Congress and founded communal settlements like the Tolstoy Farm to train passive resisters in non-violent warfare.
- Institution of the Commemoration: To commemorate this monumental return, which permanently altered the trajectory of the Indian freedom struggle, the Government of India officially instituted Pravasi Bharatiya Divas (NRI Day) in 2003, following the recommendations of the L.M. Singhvi Committee.
- Modern Significance: This annual celebration not only honors Gandhi’s historical journey but also explicitly recognizes the massive, ongoing contributions of the overseas Indian diaspora to the economic, cultural, and technological development of modern India, bridging a crucial gap between the nation and its global citizens.
📌 Movements • Satyagraha
Q.2) Mahatma Gandhi’s first major civil disobedience movement in India, organized to protect indigo cultivators against the Tinkathia system, was the:
Ans > Champaran Satyagraha
- The Oppressive Tinkathia System: In the Champaran district of Bihar, ruthless European planters illegally forced local peasants to cultivate indigo on exactly 3/20th (known as Tinkathia) of their total landholdings under highly exploitative contracts and abysmally meager financial compensation.
- The Economic Crisis: By the late 1910s, the invention of cheaper German synthetic dyes had made natural indigo highly unprofitable globally. However, instead of releasing the farmers, the European planters aggressively increased arbitrary rents and illegal dues to maximize their massive extraction of wealth before leaving.
- Gandhi’s Intervention (1917): Invited by a deeply distressed local farmer named Rajkumar Shukla, Gandhi arrived in Champaran to launch an extensive, detailed inquiry. This marked his very first successful application of Satyagraha (Civil Disobedience) on Indian soil, actively defying British orders to immediately leave the district.
- Ultimate Success and Abolition: Supported by prominent young leaders like Rajendra Prasad, J.B. Kripalani, and Mazhar-ul-Haq, Gandhi’s relentless, peaceful agitation forced the colonial government to pass the Champaran Agrarian Act of 1918. This historic legislation formally abolished the Tinkathia system and compelled planters to refund a significant portion of the illegally extracted money.
📌 Labour Movements • Gandhi Era
Q.3) During which agitation in 1918 did Mahatma Gandhi undertake his first hunger strike in India, eventually securing a 35% wage hike for the workers?
Ans > Ahmedabad Mill Strike
- The Core Dispute: The intense conflict in Ahmedabad erupted in 1918 between the wealthy Gujarati textile mill owners (led by Ambalal Sarabhai) and the impoverished mill workers over the sudden, arbitrary withdrawal of the “Plague Bonus,” a vital financial supplement introduced during an epidemic.
- World War I Inflation: The workers were desperately facing skyrocketing inflation and severe economic hardship caused by the ongoing World War I. While the workers adamantly demanded a 50% wage increase to simply survive, the stubborn mill owners initially offered a mere, unacceptable 20% hike.
- The First Hunger Strike: To powerfully rally the exhausted workers, prevent them from resorting to violence, and exert immense moral pressure on the owners, Gandhi famously undertook his very first “fast unto death” in India. He was actively supported in this cause by Anusuya Sarabhai, the sister of a prominent mill owner.
- Resolution and Legacy: The immense pressure from Gandhi’s fast quickly forced the mill owners to submit the bitter dispute to an arbitration tribunal. A highly successful compromise was swiftly reached, securing a massive 35% wage increase for the workers. This event directly led to the formation of the influential Ahmedabad Textile Labour Association (Majoor Mahajan Sangh) in 1920.
📌 Peasant Movements • Kheda
Q.4) The Kheda Satyagraha of 1918 was an agrarian movement where peasants demanded the remission of land revenue due to crop failure. During this movement, who emerged as Gandhi’s chief lieutenant?
Ans > Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
- The Agrarian Crisis: In 1918, the Kheda district of Gujarat was utterly devastated by widespread crop failure, severe famines, and concurrent devastating epidemics of plague and cholera, pushing the local peasantry into absolute, desperate poverty and widespread starvation.
- The Revenue Code Violation: According to the official colonial Revenue Code, if the crop yield was mathematically less than one-fourth of the normal yield, farmers were legally entitled to a total remission of their land revenue. Despite overwhelming evidence of destruction, the ruthless British administration adamantly refused to grant any relief.
- The Rise of Sardar Patel: While Mahatma Gandhi provided the overarching spiritual and strategic guidance for the movement, it was a highly successful, young, London-educated lawyer named Vallabhbhai Patel who left his lucrative practice. Patel meticulously organized the grassroots peasants, solidifying his reputation as Gandhi’s chief lieutenant.
- The Silent Victory: The peasants courageously refused to pay the oppressive taxes despite their cattle and land being violently confiscated. Ultimately, the colonial government was forced to secretly issue internal instructions to effectively suspend the harsh tax collection for poor farmers and immediately return all confiscated property, marking a massive moral victory.
📌 Colonial Acts • Resistance
Q.5) The draconian Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919 was popularly summarized by Indians with the phrase “No Dalil, No Vakil, No Appeal.” What was its common name?
Ans > The Rowlatt Act
- Origins of the Act: Based entirely on the deeply biased recommendations of a sedition committee headed by the British judge Sir Sydney Rowlatt, the government passed the Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919. This act was designed to permanently extend the wartime emergency powers of the notorious Defence of India Act (1915).
- Draconian Provisions: The deeply oppressive legislation authorized the British colonial government to arbitrarily arrest and indefinitely imprison any suspected Indian citizen without a formal trial or any right to legal representation (habeas corpus) for a massive period of up to two years.
- The Public Outcry: The act fundamentally stripped Indians of their basic civil liberties, leading to the massive popular slogan “No Dalil, No Vakil, No Appeal” (No argument, no lawyer, no appeal). Prominent nationalist leaders, including Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Madan Mohan Malaviya, immediately resigned from the Imperial Legislative Council in disgust.
- The Rowlatt Satyagraha: In direct, furious response to this black law, Mahatma Gandhi organized his very first nationwide mass strike (hartal), famously launching the Rowlatt Satyagraha. This specific movement definitively marked the absolute transition of the Indian freedom struggle from a moderate, elite-led movement to a massive, unstoppable grassroots mass movement.
📌 Tragic Events • Punjab
Q.6) The tragic Jallianwala Bagh massacre occurred on April 13, 1919. The crowd had gathered peacefully to celebrate which festival and protest the arrest of local leaders?
Ans > Baisakhi
- The Gathering at Amritsar: Despite the extremely harsh imposition of martial law across Punjab, thousands of entirely unarmed men, women, and children gathered peacefully at the enclosed Jallianwala Bagh ground in Amritsar on April 13, 1919, specifically to celebrate the culturally significant Punjabi harvest festival of Baisakhi.
- The Peaceful Protest: A significant portion of the massive crowd had also gathered to peacefully, non-violently protest the highly arbitrary and sudden arrests of two deeply beloved, prominent local nationalist leaders, Dr. Saifuddin Kitchlew and Dr. Satyapal, who had been targeted under the draconian Rowlatt Act.
- The Horrific Massacre: Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer deliberately marched his heavily armed Gurkha and Baluch troops into the Bagh, strictly blocked the sole, narrow exit, and ordered them to fire continuously upon the trapped, unarmed crowd without any prior warning. Over 1,650 rounds were fired until their ammunition was completely exhausted, slaughtering hundreds.
- National Trauma and Rejection of Honours: The sheer brutality of the unprovoked massacre deeply traumatized the entire nation and permanently shattered any remaining illusions of British justice. In profound grief and absolute protest, Rabindranath Tagore famously renounced his prestigious British knighthood, and Mahatma Gandhi decisively returned his Kaiser-i-Hind gold medal.
📌 Commissions • Post-Massacre
Q.7) Following the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, the British government appointed a commission of inquiry. What was the name of this commission?
Ans > The Hunter Commission
- Formation of the Inquiry: Due to massive, unprecedented international outrage and intense domestic political pressure, the British government was forced to form the Disorders Inquiry Committee in October 1919. This committee was universally known as the Hunter Commission, named after its appointed chairman, Lord William Hunter.
- Indian Representation: The seven-member commission importantly included three highly respected Indian members: Sir Chimanlal Harilal Setalvad, Pandit Jagat Narayan, and Sardar Sahibzada Sultan Ahmad Khan. However, the commission’s overarching proceedings were heavily criticized as a massive colonial whitewash.
- Dyer’s Unapologetic Testimony: During his deeply shocking testimony, General Dyer displayed absolutely no remorse, brutally stating that his explicit intention was to produce a “moral effect” and strike widespread terror across Punjab. While the commission eventually condemned his heinous actions, it imposed absolutely no significant penal or criminal disciplinary action against him.
- The Congress Response: Dyer was merely removed from his active command, yet he received massive financial support via the “Morning Post” fund collected by deeply racist British sympathizers. In sheer disgust at the official sham inquiry, the Indian National Congress formed its own highly detailed, non-official inquiry committee, featuring prominent legal minds like Motilal Nehru and C.R. Das.
📌 Islamic Unity • Movements
Q.8) The Khilafat Movement was launched to protest the treatment of the Ottoman Empire after World War I. Who were its primary leaders in India?
Ans > The Ali Brothers (Shaukat Ali and Muhammad Ali)
- The Post-War Crisis: Following the absolute defeat of the massive Ottoman Empire in World War I, Indian Muslims grew deeply fearful that the spiritual, historical position of the Caliph (Khalifa)—who was widely considered the supreme religious head of Sunni Muslims globally—would be permanently dismantled by the victorious, hostile British forces through the deeply unequal Treaty of Sèvres.
- The Core Leadership: To vehemently protest this perceived massive injustice, the All India Khilafat Committee was swiftly established in 1919. The pan-Islamic political movement was aggressively and effectively spearheaded by the charismatic Ali Brothers (Maulana Shaukat Ali and Maulana Muhammad Ali Jauhar), alongside brilliant intellectuals like Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Hasrat Mohani.
- The Strategic Alliance with Gandhi: Recognizing a highly unique, unprecedented opportunity to forge an unbreakable Hindu-Muslim unity against a common colonial enemy, Mahatma Gandhi threw his absolute, unwavering support behind the Khilafat Movement, famously stating that such a chance for unity would not arise again in a hundred years.
- The Ultimate Conclusion: The Khilafat agitation was strategically merged entirely with the massive Non-Cooperation Movement. However, the specific movement naturally dissolved and lost its core relevance by 1924, when the radical Turkish nationalist leader Mustafa Kemal Ataturk officially abolished the Caliphate institution entirely, permanently removing the primary religious cause of the protests.
📌 Congress Sessions • Mass Movements
Q.9) The Non-Cooperation Movement was formally approved and endorsed by the Indian National Congress in December of which year at its Nagpur session?
Ans > 1920
- The Definitive Nagpur Session (Dec 1920): While the initial resolution for non-cooperation was hastily passed at a special session in Calcutta in September, it was definitively, overwhelmingly endorsed by the Indian National Congress at its historic, massive annual Nagpur session in December 1920, effectively handing Gandhi undisputed leadership.
- A Radical Constitutional Shift: This specific session marked a highly fundamental, revolutionary change in the Congress creed. It actively transitioned the party’s core objective from seeking mere self-government through polite constitutional means to aggressively achieving Purna Swaraj (self-rule) through peaceful, extra-constitutional mass agitation and direct action.
- Restructuring the Congress: To manage a massive nationwide struggle, the Congress constitution was radically reorganized. A highly efficient, 15-member Congress Working Committee (CWC) was created to lead the party year-round, and deeply effective Provincial Congress Committees were formed specifically on linguistic lines to mobilize the rural, non-English speaking masses.
- The Comprehensive Boycott Strategy: The finalized movement called for a highly structured, massive nationwide boycott of British-awarded titles, legislative councils, heavily biased law courts, colonial government schools, and especially foreign manufactured goods. It led directly to the proud founding of entirely independent national educational institutions like Jamia Millia Islamia and Kashi Vidyapeeth.
📌 Movement Suspension • Chauri Chaura
Q.10) Mahatma Gandhi abruptly suspended the Non-Cooperation Movement following a violent clash between a mob and the police at Chauri Chaura. In which year did this occur?
Ans > 1922
- The Horrific Incident: On February 5, 1922, in the small town of Chauri Chaura, located in the Gorakhpur district of the United Provinces (modern-day Uttar Pradesh), a deeply furious mob of protesting peasants violently clashed with armed local police. The enraged mob eventually surrounded and set the local police station entirely on fire, brutally burning 22 policemen alive.
- Gandhi’s Immediate, Uncompromising Reaction: Mahatma Gandhi was strictly, uncompromisingly committed to absolute, pure non-violence (Ahimsa). Upon receiving the horrifying news, he immediately realized that the massive Indian populace was not yet sufficiently trained or spiritually ready for a purely peaceful, non-violent mass struggle without resorting to chaos.
- The Bardoli Resolution: Acting swiftly through the Congress Working Committee, Gandhi officially passed the Bardoli Resolution on February 12, 1922, abruptly and completely calling off the massive Non-Cooperation Movement, which had been at its absolute peak and deeply shaking the foundations of the British Empire.
- The Deep Frustration of Young Leaders: The sudden, unilateral withdrawal was met with massive, profound shock and intense anger by prominent young, radical nationalist leaders, including Subhas Chandra Bose, Jawaharlal Nehru, and C.R. Das, who felt the decision was deeply disastrous to the national momentum. Shortly after, Gandhi was arrested in March 1922 and sentenced to six years in prison.
📌 Political Parties • Legislative Entry
Q.11) Disillusioned by the sudden withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement, which two leaders formed the Swaraj Party in January 1923 to contest legislative council elections?
Ans > C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru
- The Ideological Split (Pro-Changers vs. No-Changers): After the highly controversial withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement, the Congress suffered a massive ideological split at the 1922 Gaya session. The ‘Pro-changers’ fiercely advocated for actively entering legislative councils to completely wreck the colonial government from within, while the orthodox ‘No-changers’ (like Rajagopalachari and Patel) heavily preferred focusing solely on grassroots constructive work.
- The Formation of the Swarajya Party: When their highly debated proposal for council entry was decisively defeated at the Gaya session, the deeply frustrated leaders Deshbandhu Chittaranjan Das (who resigned as Congress President) and Motilal Nehru officially founded the Congress-Khilafat Swarajya Party (commonly known as the Swaraj Party) in January 1923.
- The Strategy of Consistent Obstruction: The Swaraj Party’s core, brilliant strategy was to strictly follow a policy of “uniform, continuous and consistent obstruction” within the heavily biased legislative councils. They aimed to actively prevent the colonial government from passing arbitrary laws and to constantly expose the inherent sham of the highly limited British parliamentary reforms.
- Electoral Success and Eventual Decline: The party achieved massive, highly significant electoral success in the crucial 1923 elections, winning numerous seats and successfully throwing out several oppressive colonial budgets. However, following the tragic, sudden death of the charismatic C.R. Das in 1925, the party gradually fractured due to internal conflicts and eventually lost its initial tremendous momentum.
📌 Constitutional Review • Boycotts
Q.12) The Simon Commission, an all-white statutory commission appointed to review the constitutional progress in India, was heavily boycotted when it arrived in the country in which year?
Ans > 1928
- The Premature Appointment: The Government of India Act 1919 legally mandated a strict 10-year review of its constitutional reforms. However, fearing a highly likely defeat in upcoming elections, the conservative British government hastily appointed the Indian Statutory Commission under Sir John Simon entirely two years early, in late 1927.
- The Ultimate All-White Insult: The seven-member commission (which notably included a young Clement Attlee) was composed exclusively of white British parliamentarians. The complete, deliberate exclusion of a single Indian member to decide India’s constitutional future was universally viewed as a massive, unforgivable insult to Indian intellectual dignity and the fundamental right to self-determination.
- The Universal Congress Boycott: In direct response to this deep racial affront, the Indian National Congress, during its highly significant 1927 Madras session, unanimously decided to strictly boycott the commission “at every stage and in every form.” This complete boycott was massively supported by the Muslim League and almost all other major political factions.
- The Arrival and the Martyrdom of Lala Lajpat Rai: Upon arriving in Bombay in February 1928, the commission was greeted with unprecedented nationwide strikes, massive seas of black flags, and roaring chants of “Simon Go Back.” Tragically, during one such massive, peaceful protest in Lahore, the deeply revered leader Lala Lajpat Rai was brutally beaten during a police lathi charge, later dying from his severe injuries.
📌 Constitutional Framework • Nehru Report
Q.13) The Nehru Report (1928) was the first major attempt by Indians to draft a constitutional framework for the country. It primarily demanded what political status for India?
Ans > Dominion Status
- Answering the Colonial Challenge: Deeply provoked by the highly arrogant challenge of the British Secretary of State, Lord Birkenhead, who haughtily claimed Indians were fundamentally incapable of drafting a unified, universally accepted constitution, a massive All-Parties Conference was convened. They appointed a highly specialized drafting committee brilliantly headed by Motilal Nehru.
- The Core Demand for Dominion Status: The highly detailed Nehru Report explicitly demanded the immediate granting of ‘Dominion Status’ (a form of self-governing autonomy strictly within the British Empire, similar to Australia or Canada), rather than demanding complete, absolute independence from the British crown.
- Radical Internal Opposition: This highly moderate stance on Dominion Status was heavily, fiercely opposed by a highly vocal group of radical young nationalist leaders, most notably Jawaharlal Nehru (Motilal’s own son) and Subhas Chandra Bose, who formed the influential ‘Independence for India League’ to aggressively push for nothing less than ‘Purna Swaraj’.
- Highly Progressive Constitutional Recommendations: Despite internal debates, the report was a truly remarkable constitutional milestone. It strictly rejected deeply divisive separate electorates in favor of joint electorates, explicitly recommended the creation of heavily autonomous linguistic provinces, outlined 19 fundamental rights for citizens, and strongly advocated for absolute equal rights and universal adult suffrage for women.
📌 Congress Sessions • Purna Swaraj
Q.14) The historic Lahore session of the Indian National Congress in December 1929 is famous for passing which landmark resolution?
Ans > Purna Swaraj (Complete Independence)
- The Expiry of the Ultimatum: The Congress had given the British colonial government a strict, one-year ultimatum to fully accept the highly moderate Dominion Status demanded by the Nehru Report. When the British arrogantly ignored this deadline, the Congress leadership took a massive, radical, and irreversible shift in their overarching political demands.
- Jawaharlal Nehru’s Historic Presidency: Under the highly dynamic and youthful presidency of Jawaharlal Nehru, the massive Lahore Session convened in December 1929. The assembly officially, unanimously declared that the sole, non-negotiable goal of the Indian national movement was now strictly ‘Purna Swaraj’ (Complete Independence) from British rule.
- The Unfurling of the Tricolor: In a deeply symbolic and highly emotional act of defiance against the British Empire, the newly adopted tricolor flag of independent India was proudly hoisted on the midnight of December 31, 1929, on the banks of the river Ravi, amidst massive roaring crowds and chants of ‘Inquilab Zindabad’.
- The Pledge of January 26: The Congress Working Committee subsequently issued a massive directive that January 26, 1930, would be celebrated as the very first Independence Day across the entire nation. On this historic day, hundreds of thousands of Indians in villages and cities took a solemn, public pledge to fiercely struggle until complete independence was achieved.
📌 Civil Disobedience • Dandi March
Q.15) Mahatma Gandhi launched the Civil Disobedience Movement by beginning his historic Salt March (Dandi March) from Sabarmati Ashram on which date?
Ans > March 12, 1930
- The Strategic Choice of Salt: The British colonial government maintained a strict, highly oppressive monopoly on salt, heavily taxing this absolutely basic, universal daily necessity and brutally criminalizing its local production. Gandhi brilliantly chose to break this specific, universally despised law because the salt tax deeply affected the poorest of the poor across all religious and caste divides.
- The Historic 240-Mile Journey: After delivering an ignored ultimatum (the Eleven Demands) to Viceroy Lord Irwin, Gandhi officially launched the historic Salt March on March 12, 1930. He, along with 78 highly disciplined, specifically chosen followers, marched completely on foot for exactly 240 miles from the Sabarmati Ashram towards the coastal village of Dandi in Gujarat.
- Global Attention and Mass Mobilization: The gruelling 24-day journey attracted massive, unprecedented global media attention. As Gandhi marched, he stopped in countless villages, delivering powerful speeches that electrified the massive rural populace, gathering tens of thousands of deeply inspired followers who joined the procession, transforming it into an unstoppable river of peaceful resistance.
- The Breaking of the Law (April 6): On the early morning of April 6, 1930, Gandhi ceremoniously picked up a handful of salt from the Dandi seashore, highly illegally producing salt from seawater. This simple, deeply symbolic act of defiance marked the official, explosive beginning of the massive Civil Disobedience Movement across the entire Indian subcontinent.
📌 Resistance Leaders • Dharasana
Q.16) During the Civil Disobedience Movement, a massive, non-violent protest took place at the Dharasana Salt Works. Which leader led this march following the arrest of Mahatma Gandhi?
Ans > Sarojini Naidu and Abbas Tyabji
- The Preemptive Arrest of Gandhi: Recognizing the massive, growing threat, the British administration preemptively arrested Mahatma Gandhi in early May before he could successfully execute his highly publicized plan to peacefully raid the heavily guarded Dharasana Salt Works in Gujarat.
- The Succession of Leadership: Following Gandhi’s highly controversial arrest, the mantle of leadership for the planned march legally fell to the veteran leader Abbas Tyabji. However, upon Tyabji’s subsequent swift arrest, the highly prominent poet-activist Sarojini Naidu (widely known as “the Nightingale of India”) and Imam Saheb boldly took charge of the massive column of satyagrahis.
- The Brutal Police Suppression: On May 21, 1930, the completely peaceful marchers approached the salt works. They were met with horrifying, unprovoked violence. The marching satyagrahis were viciously and repeatedly beaten over the head with heavy, steel-tipped lathis by native police acting strictly under direct British command.
- The Ultimate Test of Ahimsa: The protesters displayed absolutely unbelievable discipline, strictly adhering to Gandhi’s principle of Ahimsa (non-violence). The protesters’ absolute, unyielding refusal to fight back, or even instinctively raise a hand to protect their bleeding heads, deeply shocked the global press. The highly descriptive journalistic account by American reporter Webb Miller completely turned global public opinion against British imperial rule.
📌 Pacts & Agreements • Delhi Pact
Q.17) The Civil Disobedience Movement was temporarily suspended following a landmark agreement between Mahatma Gandhi and the Viceroy. On what date was the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (Delhi Pact) signed?
Ans > March 5, 1931
- The Context of the Delhi Pact: The massive, disruptive success of the Civil Disobedience Movement had deeply unnerved the British government. They quickly realized that the First Round Table Conference in London was absolutely meaningless and illegitimate without the participation of the Indian National Congress. Moderates like Tej Bahadur Sapru successfully mediated a meeting between Gandhi and Viceroy Lord Irwin.
- The Signing of the Agreement: Following weeks of highly intense, equal-level negotiations, the historic political agreement, formally known as the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (or the Delhi Pact), was officially signed on March 5, 1931. This agreement placed the Congress party on an equal diplomatic footing with the mighty British government for the very first time.
- Concessions Granted by the British: The British government officially agreed to immediately release all political prisoners not explicitly convicted of violence, completely return confiscated lands, and crucially, allow coastal villagers to legally manufacture salt for their own domestic consumption without paying the hated tax.
- The Suspension of the Movement: In return for these concessions, Gandhi officially agreed to entirely halt the massive Civil Disobedience Movement and formally participate in the upcoming Second Round Table Conference in London. However, the pact faced massive, severe internal criticism because Gandhi completely failed to secure a commutation of the death sentence for the beloved revolutionary Bhagat Singh.
📌 Conferences • London Sessions
Q.18) Following the Gandhi-Irwin Pact, Mahatma Gandhi traveled to London as the sole representative of the Indian National Congress to attend which Round Table Conference?
Ans > Second Round Table Conference
- The Sole Congress Delegate: Fulfilling the strict terms of the Gandhi-Irwin pact, the Indian National Congress agreed to formally end its boycott. Mahatma Gandhi, famously traveling on the SS Rajputana, arrived in London in late 1931 to attend the Second Round Table Conference as the absolute sole, exclusive representative of the vast Congress party.
- The Deadlock over Minorities: The highly anticipated conference ultimately proved to be a massive failure in granting India any significant, real political power. The proceedings became hopelessly bogged down in complex, bitter disputes within the Minorities Committee regarding deeply divisive communal representation and minority rights.
- The Demand for Separate Electorates: Leaders representing massive minority groups, most notably Dr. B.R. Ambedkar (representing the deeply oppressed depressed classes) and the Aga Khan (representing Muslims), fiercely pushed for the implementation of separate electorates. The British government enthusiastically encouraged this deep fragmentation to effectively divide the Indian nationalist front.
- Gandhi’s Staunch Opposition: Gandhi vehemently and passionately opposed the specific idea of separate electorates for the depressed classes, viewing it as a highly dangerous, calculated British strategy to permanently divide and shatter Hindu society. Unable to reach a unified national consensus, he returned to India deeply frustrated and completely empty-handed.
📌 Divide and Rule • Communal Award
Q.19) In August 1932, which British Prime Minister announced the highly controversial ‘Communal Award’, granting separate electorates to the depressed classes?
Ans > Ramsay MacDonald
- The Imperial Announcement: Exploiting the massive, unresolved disagreements from the Second Round Table Conference, British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald officially announced the highly controversial Communal Award in August 1932. This was a classic, aggressive implementation of the colonial ‘divide and rule’ strategy.
- Extension of Separate Electorates: The sweeping award not only reaffirmed the deeply divisive system of separate electorates for minority groups like Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, and Anglo-Indians but highly controversially extended this specific, fragmented voting system directly to the ‘Depressed Classes’ (now recognized as Scheduled Castes).
- The Threat of Permanent Division: Mahatma Gandhi immediately viewed this specific extension as a highly dangerous, existential threat that would permanently balkanize and artificially divide the massive Hindu society, turning untouchables into a permanent, separate political entity rather than integrating them through genuine social reform.
- The Fast Unto Death: Imprisoned deeply within the Yerawada Central Jail in Pune, Gandhi commenced a historic, massive fast unto death on September 20, 1932, in absolute, uncompromising protest against this deeply divisive award, sending shockwaves across the entire Indian political landscape.
📌 Pacts • Social Unity
Q.20) The Poona Pact of 1932, which replaced separate electorates for the depressed classes with reserved seats in joint electorates, was signed between Gandhi’s supporters and whom?
Ans > Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
- The Immense Pressure of the Fast: With Mahatma Gandhi’s health rapidly, dangerously deteriorating during his uncompromising fast unto death in Yerawada jail, intense, massive national pressure fell heavily upon Dr. B.R. Ambedkar to compromise and essentially save the Mahatma’s life.
- The Negotiation and Compromise: Following highly intense, urgent negotiations mediated heavily by prominent leaders like Madan Mohan Malaviya, a crucial, historic political agreement known as the Poona Pact was officially finalized and signed on September 24, 1932, between Dr. Ambedkar and Gandhi’s key supporters.
- The Abandonment of Separate Electorates: Under the strict terms of the pact, the controversial idea of separate electorates for the depressed classes (as proposed by the British Communal Award) was officially and completely abandoned in favor of maintaining a unified, joint Hindu electorate.
- The Massive Increase in Reserved Seats: In exchange for this massive concession, the pact guaranteed that the number of seats explicitly reserved for the depressed classes in the provincial legislatures was nearly doubled (from the 71 offered by the British to 147), firmly guaranteeing highly significant, protected political representation within a unified society.
📌 Colonial Acts • 1935 Act
Q.21) The Government of India Act 1935 proposed sweeping structural changes. It abolished Dyarchy in the provinces and replaced it with what?
Ans > Provincial Autonomy
- A Monumental Legislation: Derived heavily from the complex reports of the Simon Commission and the exhaustive discussions of the three Round Table Conferences, the Government of India Act 1935 was the absolute longest, most detailed act passed by the British Parliament regarding India up to that time.
- The End of Provincial Dyarchy: The deeply flawed 1919 Act had introduced ‘Dyarchy’ (dual rule) in the provinces, which completely separated executive powers and created massive administrative chaos. The 1935 Act officially scrapped this widely criticized, unworkable system entirely.
- The Introduction of Provincial Autonomy: In its place, the Act finally introduced highly significant ‘Provincial Autonomy’. This granted the provincial governments much more independent, sweeping administrative power and allowed elected Indian ministers to effectively control all major provincial departments, drastically reducing direct interference from the British-appointed Governors.
- The Blueprint for the Future: The Act also proposed a massive All-India Federation comprising both British Indian provinces and Princely States (though this specific federation never materialized). However, its highly detailed federal structure formed the absolute core blueprint heavily relied upon later by the framers of independent India’s Constitution.
📌 WWII Context • British Proposals
Q.22) To secure Indian cooperation during World War II, Viceroy Lord Linlithgow issued a proposal promising Dominion Status after the war. This 1940 proposal is known as what?
Ans > The August Offer
- The Desperate Geopolitical Context: Following the shocking, rapid fall of France to Nazi forces and facing the immediate, existential threat of the Battle of Britain, the British government desperately needed massive Indian military and financial support for the escalating World War II effort.
- Viceroy Linlithgow’s Statement: Attempting to swiftly win over the deeply alienated Indian leadership, Viceroy Lord Linlithgow officially issued a highly calculated political statement in August 1940, completely known as the August Offer.
- The Core Promises: The offer specifically promised to grant India Dominion Status at an unspecified, distant future date after the conclusion of the war. It also proposed the immediate, significant expansion of the Viceroy’s executive council to include more Indians and promised the eventual setting up of a constituent assembly composed primarily of Indians.
- The Massive Rejection: The Indian National Congress overwhelmingly and fiercely rejected the offer. Jawaharlal Nehru famously noted that the concept of Dominion Status was already “as dead as a doornail,” and the party absolutely refused to accept any fragile, post-dated promises in exchange for immediate cooperation in an imperial war.
📌 Protests • Freedom of Speech
Q.23) Rejecting the August Offer, Mahatma Gandhi launched the ‘Individual Satyagraha’ in 1940 to affirm the right to free speech. Who was chosen as the very first Satyagrahi?
Ans > Acharya Vinoba Bhave
- A Highly Controlled Protest Strategy: Following the complete rejection of the August Offer, Gandhi opted for a highly limited, meticulously controlled ‘Individual Satyagraha’ rather than launching a massive, uncontrollable nationwide movement. He wished to avoid causing widespread, violent chaos that could hamper the global anti-fascist war effort.
- Asserting the Right to Dissent: The primary, explicit goal of this highly specific movement was to firmly assert the fundamental Indian right to free speech and to publicly, peacefully dissent against India’s forced, unconsented participation in the British World War II effort.
- The Selection of Vinoba Bhave: Mahatma Gandhi personally and very carefully selected his deeply devoted, highly spiritual disciple, Acharya Vinoba Bhave, to be the very first Satyagrahi to court arrest by deliberately making an anti-war speech in public.
- The Subsequent Campaign: Following Bhave’s arrest, Jawaharlal Nehru was specifically chosen as the second Satyagrahi, and Brahma Datt as the third. This highly symbolic, peaceful campaign eventually led to the organized, willing arrest of nearly 25,000 nationalist leaders and workers across India before it was eventually called off.
📌 Diplomatic Missions • British Delegation
Q.24) In March 1942, the British government dispatched a mission to India to negotiate a political settlement. Gandhi famously dismissed it as a “post-dated cheque”. What was this mission called?
Ans > The Cripps Mission
- The Looming Japanese Threat: By early 1942, the Imperial Japanese army was rapidly advancing through Southeast Asia, effectively reaching the very borders of India at Rangoon. Facing immense pressure from US President FDR and China’s Chiang Kai-shek to resolve the Indian political crisis, Winston Churchill reluctantly dispatched Sir Stafford Cripps to India.
- The Proposed Settlement: The Cripps Mission explicitly proposed granting full Dominion Status and a post-war constituent assembly entirely staffed by Indians. However, it contained a highly dangerous clause: any province completely unwilling to accept the new constitution would be allowed to legally secede and form a separate union, effectively hinting at partition.
- The Infamous Dismissal: The mission failed utterly because it strictly offered power only after the war ended, while demanding immediate, total wartime cooperation. Gandhi famously and harshly criticized its heavily delayed, highly fragile promises as a “post-dated cheque on a crashing bank.”
- The Total Breakdown of Negotiations: Both the Indian National Congress (who wanted an immediate transfer of substantial power) and the Muslim League (who felt the proposal for Pakistan was not explicit enough) entirely rejected the mission, setting the absolute stage for the final, massive phase of the freedom struggle.
📌 Final Struggles • Quit India
Q.25) Following the failure of the Cripps Mission, the historic “Quit India” resolution was passed by the All India Congress Committee on August 8, 1942, in which city?
Ans > Bombay
- The Frustration Spills Over: The utter, dismal failure of the Cripps Mission completely convinced the Congress leadership that the British government had absolutely no real intention of parting with power. Facing the imminent threat of a Japanese invasion, they decided a massive, final push was necessary.
- The Historic Resolution at Gowalia Tank: At the massive Gowalia Tank Maidan (now appropriately named August Kranti Maidan) in Bombay, the All India Congress Committee officially, aggressively passed the historic “Quit India” resolution on the evening of August 8, 1942, demanding an immediate, total end to British imperial rule.
- The “Do or Die” Mantra: Addressing the massive gathering, Mahatma Gandhi delivered his famous, highly electrifying speech, giving the nation the absolute mantra: “Do or Die. We shall either free India or die in the attempt.”
- Operation Zero Hour and the Leaderless Uprising: The very next morning, under ‘Operation Zero Hour’, almost the entire top Congress leadership (including Gandhi and Nehru) was completely arrested by the British. This sudden action plunged the nation into massive, leaderless, and highly disruptive uprisings against colonial infrastructure, sparking the establishment of parallel governments in several districts like Ballia and Satara.
📌 Armed Resistance • INA Origin
Q.26) The Indian National Army (INA), aiming to liberate India with Japanese assistance, was originally conceptualized and formed in 1942 by which former British Indian Army officer?
Ans > Captain Mohan Singh
- The Genesis of the Armed Force: The initial, highly radical concept of creating a dedicated armed liberation force specifically using massive numbers of Indian prisoners of war (POWs) captured by the Japanese in Malaya and Singapore was the brilliant brainchild of Captain Mohan Singh, a former officer in the British Indian Army.
- The First INA Formation (1942): Aided heavily by the veteran revolutionary Rash Behari Bose and the widespread Indian Independence League in Tokyo, Captain Mohan Singh successfully established the first Indian National Army (INA) in 1942. However, this initial force collapsed shortly after due to severe disagreements regarding troop deployment with the Japanese military command.
- Subhas Chandra Bose’s Takeover (1943): The INA was massively reorganized, heavily expanded, and deeply electrified in 1943 when the charismatic Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose arrived in Singapore via submarine from Germany. He took supreme command of the Azad Hind Fauj, forming the Provisional Government of Free India.
- The Famous Brigades: Under Bose’s dynamic leadership, the INA launched an armed campaign against the British on the Burma front. The army was famously, symbolically organized into brigades named after great national leaders (Gandhi, Nehru, Azad) and notably featured the highly pioneering, all-women combat unit called the Rani of Jhansi Regiment, led by Captain Lakshmi Sahgal.
📌 Power Transfer • Cabinet Mission
Q.27) To break the political deadlock and discuss the transfer of power, British Prime Minister Clement Attlee sent the Cabinet Mission to India in which year?
Ans > 1946
- The High-Level Delegation Arrives: Recognizing the absolute impossibility of maintaining colonial rule post-WWII, the newly elected Labour Prime Minister Clement Attlee dispatched a highly crucial Cabinet Mission to India in March 1946. The delegation consisted of three very senior British cabinet ministers: Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, and A.V. Alexander.
- Rejection of a Sovereign Pakistan: After highly exhaustive discussions with all major political parties, the mission explicitly, firmly rejected Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s demand for a completely separate, sovereign Pakistan, arguing it would be economically unviable and highly dangerous for the region’s minorities.
- The Proposed Federal Structure: Instead, it proposed a highly complex, three-tier loose federal structure. It envisioned a weak central government handling only defense, foreign affairs, and communications, while heavily autonomous provinces would be grouped into three distinct sections (Groups A, B, and C) based on their religious majority to appease Muslim anxieties.
- The Eventual Breakdown: The plan also established the crucial mechanism for a massive Constituent Assembly and an interim government. While initially accepted by both the Congress and the Muslim League, the plan eventually fell apart completely over severe disagreements regarding whether the grouping of provinces was strictly compulsory or completely optional.
📌 Communal Violence • Calcutta
Q.28) Frustrated by the Cabinet Mission Plan’s rejection of an independent Pakistan, the Muslim League called for “Direct Action Day”, triggering the Great Calcutta Killings. On what date was this observed?
Ans > August 16, 1946
- The Withdrawal of Acceptance: Furious over the Congress’s interpretation of the Cabinet Mission plan’s grouping clause, and deeply frustrated by the lack of an explicit Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah entirely retracted the Muslim League’s initial acceptance of the British proposal in July 1946.
- The Call for Direct Action: To aggressively assert their non-negotiable demand for an independent Muslim state and prove their massive street power, Jinnah officially declared August 16, 1946, as “Direct Action Day,” calling for a nationwide general strike to forcefully achieve Pakistan.
- The Great Calcutta Killings: The day sparked unprecedented, horrifyingly brutal communal riots in Calcutta (now Kolkata), where the Muslim League government was in power. The violence spiraled entirely out of control, leading to the brutal slaughter of over 4,000 people and leaving 100,000 completely homeless in just 72 hours.
- The Inevitability of Partition: The sheer scale and massive brutality of the bloodshed in Calcutta quickly spread like wildfire to other regions like Noakhali, Bihar, and Punjab. This horrific cycle of violence fundamentally convinced many top Congress leaders (except Gandhi) that the tragic partition of India was now practically, undeniably inevitable to prevent a full-scale civil war.
📌 Partition • Mountbatten Plan
Q.29) The plan that formally proposed the partition of India into two independent dominions (India and Pakistan) is famously known as the Mountbatten Plan. By what other name is it officially known?
Ans > The June 3 Plan
- The Final Viceroy’s Mandate: Lord Louis Mountbatten dramatically arrived in India in March 1947, completely replacing Lord Wavell, with a highly specific, urgent mandate from the British government to swiftly and decisively transfer power before June 1948.
- The Conclusion of Unworkability: After heavily evaluating the explosive communal situation, Mountbatten quickly and firmly concluded that transferring power to a united India was absolutely impossible without triggering a massive civil war. He formulated a strict, accelerated plan for the complete partition of the subcontinent.
- The Announcement of the June 3 Plan: Officially announced on June 3, 1947 (hence known as the June 3 Plan), the blueprint explicitly outlined the exact legal procedure for the massive partition of British India. It specifically allowed the heavily divided provincial assemblies of Punjab and Bengal to formally vote on dividing their respective provinces.
- Boundary Commissions and Princely States: The plan also firmly established boundary commissions (under Sir Cyril Radcliffe) to strictly demarcate the exact borders, called for referendums in the NWFP and Sylhet, and explicitly stated that the British paramountcy over the 560+ princely states would completely lapse, leaving them to choose their own destiny.
📌 Independence • Legislative Act
Q.30) The Indian Independence Bill, which legally enacted the provisions of the Mountbatten Plan, received Royal Assent from the British monarch on which date?
Ans > July 18, 1947
- The Swift Legislative Mechanism: To rapidly execute the complex provisions of the Mountbatten Plan, the British Parliament hastily drafted the Indian Independence Bill. It was passed through the House of Commons and the House of Lords with unprecedented speed and formally received Royal Assent on July 18, 1947.
- The Creation of Two Dominions: This highly historic legislation legally and definitively mandated the creation of two entirely independent dominions, India and Pakistan, officially coming into existence at the stroke of midnight on August 15, 1947, thereby ending nearly 200 years of British colonial rule.
- The Lapsing of Paramountcy: A crucial provision of the Act formally abolished the office of the Secretary of State for India and officially ended British suzerainty (paramountcy) over the numerous princely states. This technically allowed them to join either dominion or remain completely independent, triggering a massive integration crisis for Sardar Patel.
- The Final Act of Empire: The Act firmly stripped the British Crown of the grand title “Emperor of India,” mandated the massive, highly complex division of the armed forces and financial assets, and granted the respective Constituent Assemblies absolute, sovereign power to draft their own independent constitutions without any external interference.
📌 Quick Summary — Modern History Set 149
- 1915: Gandhi returned to India permanently on January 9 (Pravasi Bharatiya Divas).
- 1917: Champaran Satyagraha (First Civil Disobedience).
- 1918: Ahmedabad Mill Strike (First Hunger Strike) & Kheda Satyagraha (led by Sardar Patel).
- 1919: The Rowlatt Act passed. Resulted in Jallianwala Bagh massacre on Baisakhi (April 13). Hunter Commission appointed.
- 1919: Khilafat Movement launched by Ali Brothers.
- 1920: Non-Cooperation Movement formally approved at Nagpur Congress Session.
- 1922: Non-Cooperation suspended after Chauri Chaura incident.
- 1923: Swaraj Party formed by C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru.
- 1928: Simon Commission boycotted. Nehru Report demands Dominion Status.
- 1929: Lahore Session passes Purna Swaraj (Complete Independence) resolution.
- 1930: Dandi March (Civil Disobedience) begins March 12. Dharasana Salt Works protest led by Sarojini Naidu.
- 1931: Gandhi-Irwin Pact signed (March 5). Gandhi attends Second Round Table Conference.
- 1932: Communal Award by Ramsay MacDonald. Poona Pact signed with Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.
- 1935: Government of India Act replaces Dyarchy with Provincial Autonomy.
- 1940: August Offer proposed. Gandhi launches Individual Satyagraha (Vinoba Bhave first).
- 1942: Cripps Mission rejected. “Quit India” resolution passed in Bombay. INA conceptualized by Captain Mohan Singh.
- 1946: Cabinet Mission sent to India. Direct Action Day observed on August 16.
- 1947: Mountbatten Plan (June 3 Plan) proposes partition. Indian Independence Bill receives Royal Assent on July 18.
Timer ⏳
20:00
Progress (0/30)
Click any card to flip and reveal the summarized answer!
Smart Review: Questions you got wrong appear here for focused study.