Polity Set 12 | MROY Class

Polity Set 12 Questions & Answers

The Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution are enshrined in Part III from Articles: – 12 to 35
Which Fundamental Right is available to BOTH citizens and foreigners (except enemy aliens)? – Protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21)
Article 12 defines the term ‘State’ for the purposes of Part III. According to the Supreme Court, this definition even includes: – A private body or an agency working as an instrument of the State
The concept of ‘equal protection of laws’ found in Article 14 has been taken from the: – American Constitution
Which Article states that no citizen shall be subjected to any disability on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth with regard to access to shops, public restaurants, and hotels? – Article 15
Which Constitutional Amendment Act provided a quota of 27% for candidates belonging to the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in central higher educational institutions (exception to Article 15)? – 93rd Amendment Act of 2005
Who was the chairman of the Second Backward Classes Commission appointed in 1979? – B.P. Mandal
Article 17 abolishes ‘untouchability’. The Supreme Court held that the right under Article 17 is available against: – Private individuals as well as the State
Article 19 protects six rights regarding freedom. Which of the following is NOT one of these six rights currently? – Right to acquire, hold, and dispose of property
According to Article 20, the protection against “double jeopardy” means: – No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once
In which case did the Supreme Court overrule its judgement in the Gopalan case, ruling that the right to life and personal liberty can be deprived by a law only if the procedure is reasonable, fair, and just? – Menaka case (1978)
Article 21A, added by the 86th Amendment Act of 2002, makes which type of education a Fundamental Right? – Elementary education for children of the age of six to fourteen years
Which part of Article 22 grants protection to persons who are arrested or detained under an ordinary law (not preventive detention)? – The first part
Article 23 prohibits traffic in human beings and ‘begar’. The term ‘begar’ means: – Compulsory work without remuneration
Under Article 25, the explanation clarifies that the term ‘Hindus’ includes: – Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists
Article 29 provides that any section of the citizens having a distinct language, script, or culture shall have the right to conserve it. The Supreme Court held that this right is available to: – Minorities as well as the majority
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called which Article “the very soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it”? – Article 32
Which writ literally means “to have the body of” and is issued by the court to set a detained person free if the detention is found to be illegal? – Habeas Corpus
Which writ is issued by the court to a public official asking him to perform his official duties that he has failed or refused to perform? – Mandamus
Article 33 empowers Parliament to restrict or abrogate the fundamental rights of the members of the armed forces to: – Ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them
The Directive Principles of State Policy are enumerated in the Constitution from: – Articles 36 to 51
Which Constitutional Amendment Act added four new Directive Principles, including the directive to “promote equal justice and to provide free legal aid to the poor” (Article 39 A)? – 42nd Amendment Act (1976)
The Directive Principles which reflect the programme of reconstruction enunciated by Gandhi during the national movement are known as: – Gandhian Principles
Which of the following is a Liberal-Intellectual Principle? – To separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services (Article 50)
Which Article states that the Directive Principles are non-justiciable but “are fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws”? – Article 37
In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court held that the Indian Constitution is founded on the bedrock of the balance between: – The Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles
The 97th Amendment Act of 2011 added a new Directive Principle (Article 43B) relating to: – Co-operative societies
Who opined that the Directive Principles are aimed at furthering the goals of the social revolution? – Granville Austin
The Lok Adalat, a statutory forum for conciliatory settlement of legal disputes, was established to fulfill the Directive Principle of providing free legal aid. It was set up under which Act? – The Legal Services Authorities Act (1987)
Which Directive (outside Part IV) states that it shall be the endeavour of every state to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups? – Article 350-A

MROY Class

Polity Set 12

🔍

📌 Fundamental Rights

Q.1) The Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution are enshrined in Part III from Articles:

Ans > 12 to 35

Constitutional Framework: The Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution are enshrined in Part III, spanning from Article 12 to Article 35. This section is often rightfully described as the ‘Magna Carta of India’, guaranteeing core civil liberties to all citizens to allow them to lead a life of dignity, peace, and harmony.
International Inspiration: These fundamental rights are heavily inspired by the Constitution of the United States of America (specifically, their Bill of Rights). They are highly comprehensive and widely considered more detailed than those found in the constitutions of any other democratic country in the world.
Justiciable Nature: Fundamental Rights are strictly justiciable in nature, meaning that they are legally enforceable by the courts. If a citizen’s fundamental rights are violated by the state or an individual, they can directly move to the Supreme Court (under Article 32) or High Courts (under Article 226) for their immediate enforcement.
Subject to Restrictions: However, it is crucial to note that these rights are not absolute. The Constitution specifically empowers the State to impose ‘reasonable restrictions’ on them based on explicit grounds like state security, public order, decency, and morality, perfectly balancing individual liberty with necessary social control.

📌 Fundamental Rights

Q.2) Which Fundamental Right is available to BOTH citizens and foreigners (except enemy aliens)?

Ans > Protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21)

Universal Application: Article 21, which guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty, is a universally applicable fundamental right available to both Indian citizens and foreigners (excluding enemy aliens). It emphatically states that no person shall be deprived of their life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law.
Expansive Judicial Scope: The Supreme Court of India has drastically expanded the scope of Article 21 over the decades through various landmark judgements. It is no longer just about mere animal existence or survival; it deeply encompasses the right to live with human dignity, the right to a clean environment, the right to privacy (affirmed in the Puttaswamy judgement), and the right to health.
Basic Human Right: Unlike some other constitutional rights (like those under Article 19, 15, or 16 which are strictly reserved for citizens), the framers of the Constitution recognized basic life and liberty as fundamental human rights that must be afforded to absolutely anyone residing within the territorial jurisdiction of India.
Emergency Protections: Even during a declared National Emergency under Article 352, the fundamental rights guaranteed by Article 21 (along with the protections in Article 20) absolutely cannot be suspended by presidential order, highlighting its paramount, non-derogable importance in the Indian constitutional framework.

📌 Fundamental Rights

Q.3) Article 12 defines the term ‘State’ for the purposes of Part III. According to the Supreme Court, this definition even includes:

Ans > A private body or an agency working as an instrument of the State

Expansive Definition: Article 12 provides a highly expansive definition of the term ‘State’ for the specific application of Part III (Fundamental Rights) and Part IV (Directive Principles). It explicitly includes the Government and Parliament of India, the Government and Legislature of each state, and all local or other authorities within India’s territory.
Scope of Local Authorities: The term ‘local authorities’ encompasses a wide range of governing bodies including municipalities, village panchayats, district boards, and improvement trusts. However, the most significant judicial expansion has been regarding the interpretation of the phrase ‘other authorities’, bringing numerous statutory and non-statutory bodies under the ambit of the State.
Inclusion of Private Bodies: The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that even a private body, corporation, or agency working as an ‘instrumentality or agency’ of the State falls strictly within the definition of Article 12. This legally includes massive organizations like LIC, ONGC, and SAIL under constitutional scrutiny.
Rationale for Broad Interpretation: The core rationale behind this incredibly broad judicial interpretation is to ensure that the fundamental rights of citizens are protected not just from the traditional executive and legislative branches of government, but also from any entity that exercises significant public functions or receives massive state funding and control.

📌 Right to Equality

Q.4) The concept of ‘equal protection of laws’ found in Article 14 has been taken from the:

Ans > American Constitution

Dual Concepts of Equality: Article 14 firmly embodies the fundamental principle of the ‘Right to Equality’. It actually contains two distinct legal concepts: ‘equality before the law’ (which is of British origin) and ‘equal protection of the laws’ (which is borrowed directly from the American Constitution).
Positive Equality Mandate: The concept of ‘equal protection of laws’ is highly positive in nature. It strictly mandates the equality of treatment under legally equal circumstances, both in terms of the privileges conferred and the liabilities imposed by the laws. It essentially implies that equals should always be treated equally without any discrimination.
Permitting Reasonable Classification: This American concept realistically recognizes that absolute, mathematical equality is impossible because human beings are unequal in their needs, capacities, and socio-economic circumstances. Therefore, it permits the State to classify persons for legitimate legislative purposes, provided the classification itself is not arbitrary or artificial.
The Test of Validity: For any legislative classification to be constitutionally valid and not violate the equal protection clause, it must pass the rigorous legal test of ‘intelligible differentia’ (a clear, logical distinction between those grouped together and those left out) and it must have a rational, logical nexus to the specific object sought to be achieved by the law.

📌 Right to Equality

Q.5) Which Article states that no citizen shall be subjected to any disability on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth with regard to access to shops, public restaurants, and hotels?

Ans > Article 15

Core Principle of Non-Discrimination: Article 15 of the Indian Constitution is an absolute cornerstone of social equality, explicitly stating that the State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds *only* of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. The specific use of the word ‘only’ is crucial, meaning discrimination based on other grounds (like physical fitness for a job) is not strictly prohibited by this clause.
Targeting Social Exclusion: The second clause of Article 15 directly and aggressively targets deeply entrenched societal discrimination and historical prejudices. It explicitly mandates that no citizen shall, on the aforementioned specific grounds, be subjected to any disability, liability, restriction, or condition regarding access to shops, public restaurants, hotels, and places of public entertainment.
Equal Access to Resources: Furthermore, this vital clause ensures absolute equal access to the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads, and places of public resort that are maintained wholly or partly out of State funds or are dedicated specifically to the use of the general public.
Enforceability Against Private Actors: Unlike the first clause of Article 15 which is a constitutional directive acting only against the State machinery, this second provision regarding equal access to public places is legally enforceable against both the State and private individuals, making it a highly powerful tool for dismantling historical practices of untouchability and social exclusion.

📌 Right to Equality

Q.6) Which Constitutional Amendment Act provided a quota of 27% for candidates belonging to the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in central higher educational institutions (exception to Article 15)?

Ans > 93rd Amendment Act of 2005

Expanding Affirmative Action: The 93rd Constitutional Amendment Act, enacted in the year 2005, significantly expanded the scope of affirmative action in India by formally inserting a brand-new clause (5) into Article 15. This was recognized as a historic, landmark move in the ongoing pursuit of educational equality and social justice.
Empowering the State: This specific constitutional amendment empowered the State to make special, legally binding provisions for the rapid advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens (OBCs), or for the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), specifically regarding their admission processes to educational institutions.
Wide Institutional Scope: The constitutional mandate covers almost all types of educational institutions. This includes elite central higher educational institutions like the IITs and IIMs, and surprisingly, encompasses both private aided and private unaided institutions. The only legal exception strictly provided in the amendment is for minority educational institutions established under Article 30.
Statutory Implementation: Closely following this amendment, the Parliament enacted the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act in 2006. This Act officially provided a strict statutory quota of 27% for candidates belonging to the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in all central higher educational institutions, fundamentally and permanently changing the demographic and social makeup of these elite campuses.

📌 Backward Classes

Q.7) Who was the chairman of the Second Backward Classes Commission appointed in 1979?

Ans > B.P. Mandal

Formation of the Commission: The Second Backward Classes Commission was officially constituted by the President of India in the year 1979, during the tenure of the Morarji Desai-led Janata Party government. It was appointed strictly under the constitutional provisions and mandate of Article 340.
The Mandal Leadership: The commission was chaired by B.P. Mandal, a prominent Member of Parliament, and is therefore universally and historically known as the ‘Mandal Commission’. Its primary mandate was to deeply investigate the severe conditions of socially and educationally backward classes across India and recommend concrete legislative measures for their rapid advancement.
Exhaustive Demographics Study: After conducting exhaustive nationwide surveys and empirical studies, the commission submitted its monumental report in 1980. It controversially identified over 3,700 specific castes and communities as socially and educationally backward classes, effectively comprising roughly 52% of the total Indian population at that time (excluding the SCs and STs).
Historic Recommendation & Implementation: The commission’s most highly impactful and debated recommendation was to immediately implement a 27% reservation in government jobs and public sector undertakings specifically for these Other Backward Classes (OBCs). This massive recommendation was finally implemented a decade later in 1990 by the V.P. Singh government, sparking massive nationwide protests but fundamentally altering the landscape of Indian politics and social justice forever.

📌 Right to Equality

Q.8) Article 17 abolishes ‘untouchability’. The Supreme Court held that the right under Article 17 is available against:

Ans > Private individuals as well as the State

Absolute Eradication: Article 17 of the Constitution is a highly unique and absolute fundamental right. It unequivocally abolishes the ancient, deeply oppressive social practice of “untouchability” and strictly forbids its practice in absolutely any form, without providing for any exceptions or ‘reasonable restrictions’ whatsoever.
Horizontal Application: The Supreme Court of India has categorically and repeatedly held that the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 17 is available against private individuals just as much as it is available against the machinery of the State. This makes it one of the few truly ‘horizontal’ rights in the Indian Constitution.
State’s Proactive Obligation: It is the explicit constitutional obligation of the State to take necessary, highly proactive action to ensure that this absolute right is not violated by any private actor or community. To give real legal teeth to this Article, the Parliament swiftly enacted the Untouchability (Offences) Act in the year 1955.
Stringent Legal Framework: This specific legislation was later comprehensively amended, significantly strengthened, and formally renamed as the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955. The Act prescribes severe, stringent criminal punishments for anyone found legally guilty of practicing untouchability, thereby aggressively enforcing the constitutional mandate of absolute social equality and human dignity for all citizens.

📌 Right to Freedom

Q.9) Article 19 protects six rights regarding freedom. Which of the following is NOT one of these six rights currently?

Ans > Right to acquire, hold, and dispose of property

Original Constitutional Structure: Article 19 originally served as the absolute protector of seven core democratic freedoms for Indian citizens. However, one of these original foundational rights—specifically the fundamental right to acquire, hold, and dispose of property (under Article 19(1)(f))—was deliberately and permanently removed from the list of Fundamental Rights.
The 44th Amendment Act: This massive, paradigm-shifting constitutional change was legally executed through the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978, enacted during the tenure of the Janata Party government. The primary governmental reason for this deletion was that the fundamental right to property was constantly acting as a major legal hurdle for the State in acquiring private land for major public welfare projects and vital infrastructure development.
Facilitating Land Reforms: By surgically removing it from the protected sanctuary of Part III, the government could far more easily execute socialist land reform policies, abolish the zamindari system, and redistribute massive landholdings without facing constant, debilitating constitutional challenges in the Supreme Court regarding ‘adequate compensation’.
Current Legal Status: Today, the right to property is certainly no longer a fundamental right, but it continues to legally exist as a standard constitutional and legal right under Article 300A, safely housed in Part XII of the Constitution. This effectively means the State can still deprive a person of their property, but only by the strict authority of a valid law passed by the legislature, not merely by arbitrary executive order.

📌 Right to Freedom

Q.10) According to Article 20, the protection against “double jeopardy” means:

Ans > No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once

Core Criminal Protections: Article 20 of the Indian Constitution grants highly crucial, non-derogable protections to individuals regarding conviction for criminal offenses. One of its three core, fundamental pillars is the strict legal protection against “double jeopardy,” which is explicitly enshrined in Article 20(2).
The Principle Explained: The constitutional doctrine of double jeopardy strictly mandates that “no person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.” This vital principle is deeply rooted in the ancient Latin legal maxim *’nemo debet bis vexari’*, which essentially means that a man shall not be brought into legal danger or jeopardy twice for one and the exact same offense.
Twin Conditions Required: For this specific constitutional protection to legally apply in India, two specific conditions must be met simultaneously: the person must have been both previously *prosecuted* (subjected to a formal trial) AND legally *punished* for that exact same offense. If a person was prosecuted but legally acquitted, a retrial might theoretically be possible depending on specific appeal laws, though criminal procedure codes usually heavily restrict it.
Limitation to Judicial Forums: It is highly important to note that this specific protection is exclusively available in proceedings taking place before a formal court of law or a recognized judicial tribunal. It absolutely does not offer any protection against subsequent departmental, administrative, or disciplinary actions taken by an employer, government department, or regulatory body for the exact same underlying misconduct.

📌 Right to Life

Q.11) In which case did the Supreme Court overrule its judgement in the Gopalan case, ruling that the right to life and personal liberty can be deprived by a law only if the procedure is reasonable, fair, and just?

Ans > Menaka case (1978)

The Initial Narrow View: In the historic A.K. Gopalan case (1950), the Supreme Court of India had taken a very narrow, literal interpretation of Article 21. The court ruled that protection was only available against arbitrary executive action, meaning that any legally enacted law by the parliament could technically deprive a person of their life or liberty, regardless of how inherently unjust or unfair that law was.
The Historic Reversal: However, the monumental and highly celebrated Menaka Gandhi vs. Union of India case in 1978 totally revolutionized Indian constitutional jurisprudence. The Supreme Court explicitly and boldly overruled its own previous Gopalan judgement, heavily widening the protective scope of Article 21.
The Rule of Fairness: The Court decisively ruled that the constitutional phrase “procedure established by law” found in Article 21 is not just a mere formal, technical requirement. Any law that seeks to actively deprive a citizen of their personal liberty must prescribe a procedure that is strictly “reasonable, fair, and just,” and not arbitrary, fanciful, or legally oppressive.
Infusing Due Process: By aggressively introducing this fairness criteria, the Supreme Court essentially infused the powerful American constitutional concept of “due process of law” directly into Article 21. This monumental shift means the judiciary can now actively strike down laws not just for procedural flaws, but also if the substantive intent of the law itself is deemed fundamentally unfair or unjust to human dignity.

📌 Right to Education

Q.12) Article 21A, added by the 86th Amendment Act of 2002, makes which type of education a Fundamental Right?

Ans > Elementary education for children of the age of six to fourteen years

A Constitutional Milestone: Article 21A was formally and permanently inserted into the Indian Constitution by the landmark 86th Constitutional Amendment Act in the year 2002. This marked a historic, paradigm shift in India’s legislative approach to childhood education, finally recognizing it as an absolute constitutional necessity rather than just a distant policy goal.
The Explicit Mandate: This specific Article explicitly and clearly mandates that “The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the State may, by law, determine.” This critical move successfully elevated elementary education from a non-justiciable Directive Principle (previously housed under Article 45) to a fully enforceable Fundamental Right.
Strict Age and Scope Limitations: The provision strictly applies only to elementary education (class 1 to 8) and does not constitutionally guarantee free higher education, secondary education, or professional education. However, it places a massive, undeniable legal and financial obligation on the government to ensure every single child within that specific age bracket is enrolled in school.
Legislative Implementation (RTE Act): To physically implement this newly minted fundamental right on the ground, the Indian Parliament subsequently enacted the monumental Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act in 2009. This Act laid out detailed operational norms for schools, strict pupil-teacher ratios, and controversially mandated a 25% reservation for disadvantaged children even in private, unaided educational institutions.

📌 Protection against Arrest

Q.13) Which part of Article 22 grants protection to persons who are arrested or detained under an ordinary law (not preventive detention)?

Ans > The first part

Dual Structure of Article 22: Article 22 provides highly critical constitutional safeguards against arbitrary arrest and illegal detention by law enforcement. The Article is structurally divided into two distinct, separate parts: the first part deals with arrests made under ordinary criminal laws, while the second part deals exclusively with arrests made under highly controversial preventive detention laws.
Core Rights Under Ordinary Law: The first part grants several absolute, non-negotiable rights to any person arrested under an ordinary law. Chief among these is the right to be immediately informed of the exact grounds or reasons for their arrest; the police cannot simply detain someone without explaining why they are being held.
Right to Legal Counsel: Furthermore, this part guarantees the arrested individual the fundamental constitutional right to seamlessly consult, and be legally defended by, a legal practitioner or lawyer of their own choice from the very moment of their arrest, ensuring they are not forced to face the state machinery alone.
The Crucial 24-Hour Rule: Crucially, this first part also strictly mandates the “24-hour rule.” Any person arrested and held in police custody must physically be produced before the nearest judicial magistrate within exactly 24 hours of their arrest (excluding the time strictly necessary for the journey). If the magistrate does not explicitly authorize further police detention, the person must be released immediately, completely preventing secret or indefinite police detentions.

📌 Right against Exploitation

Q.14) Article 23 prohibits traffic in human beings and ‘begar’. The term ‘begar’ means:

Ans > Compulsory work without remuneration

Eradicating Systemic Exploitation: Article 23 is a deeply significant fundamental right aimed directly at permanently eradicating all forms of systemic, historical exploitation that have heavily plagued Indian society for centuries. It expressly and absolutely prohibits traffic in human beings, ‘begar’, and all other similar forms of forced labor.
The Historical Context of ‘Begar’: The specific term ‘begar’ refers to a highly oppressive historical practice, common in feudal and colonial India, where powerful local landlords, zamindars, or princely rulers forced marginalized peasants and lower-caste laborers to perform arduous physical work for absolutely no financial remuneration or payment whatsoever.
Broad Judicial Interpretation: The Supreme Court has interpreted the constitutional scope of Article 23 extremely broadly. It forcefully ruled that “forced labor” does not merely mean physical or legal force used by an employer. It explicitly also includes economic compulsion. If a person is forced by severe poverty, hunger, or debt to work for wages lower than the statutory minimum wage, it legally qualifies as forced labor and a direct violation of Article 23.
Legislative Enforcement: To aggressively enforce this vital constitutional mandate, the Indian Parliament has enacted several strict legislative measures, most notably the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act of 1976 and the Equal Remuneration Act, ensuring that economic desperation cannot be legally weaponized by employers to extract unpaid or severely underpaid labor.

📌 Freedom of Religion

Q.15) Under Article 25, the explanation clarifies that the term ‘Hindus’ includes:

Ans > Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists

Context of the Provision: Article 25 primarily guarantees the freedom of conscience and the fundamental right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion. However, Article 25(2)(b) specifically empowers the State to make laws providing for social welfare and reform, or for throwing open Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.
The Constitutional Explanation: To ensure maximum legal clarity and prevent future loopholes regarding temple entry movements and social reform laws, the Constitution provides a specific ‘Explanation’ appended directly to Article 25. This explanation provides a highly specific, expanded legal definition of the term ‘Hindus’ for this exact context.
Inclusivity of the Definition: It explicitly and legally clarifies that any reference to Hindus in this specific constitutional context shall be legally construed as including a direct reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina, or Buddhist religions.
Implications for Social Reform: Consequently, the constitutional mandate to throw open religious institutions to all sections equally applies to Sikh Gurdwaras, Jain Derasars, and Buddhist Viharas. This legal grouping deeply acknowledges the shared historical, cultural, and geographical roots of these Indic religions while allowing the State to push for egalitarian social reforms (like eradicating caste-based entry bans) across all of them simultaneously without facing jurisdictional challenges based on narrow religious definitions.

📌 Cultural and Educational Rights

Q.16) Article 29 provides that any section of the citizens having a distinct language, script, or culture shall have the right to conserve it. The Supreme Court held that this right is available to:

Ans > Minorities as well as the majority

The Core Cultural Guarantee: Article 29 of the Constitution is primarily and famously designed to deeply protect the cultural and linguistic interests of minorities. Its first clause clearly states that “any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.”
Debunking the Minority-Only Myth: Historically, it was widely assumed by many legal practitioners that this specific protection was exclusively meant for religious and linguistic minority groups. However, in landmark judicial interpretations, the Supreme Court of India clarified that the actual wording of the Article is deliberately much broader.
Universal Application of Cultural Rights: The Court held that the phrase “any section of the citizens” is completely inclusive. Therefore, the fundamental right to strictly conserve a distinct language, script, or culture is fully and legally available to the majority community as well, provided they have a distinct cultural identity they legitimately wish to protect and promote.
Political and Democratic Implications: Furthermore, the Supreme Court ruled that the fundamental right to conserve a language implicitly and inevitably includes the right to heavily agitate and campaign for the protection of that language. Consequently, political speeches or peaceful democratic movements actively advocating for the conservation of a specific regional language do not amount to corrupt electoral practices under the Representation of the People Act.

📌 Constitutional Remedies

Q.17) Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called which Article “the very soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it”?

Ans > Article 32

The Enforcement Mechanism: Article 32 guarantees the fundamental right to directly move the Supreme Court of India by appropriate legal proceedings for the immediate enforcement of the Fundamental Rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution. It is the ultimate legal weapon for a citizen against state overreach.
Ambedkar’s Profound Emphasis: During the intense, highly detailed debates in the Constituent Assembly, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of the Constitution, heavily emphasized the unparalleled importance of this specific provision. He famously stated, “If I was asked to name any particular article in this Constitution as the most important… I could not point to any other article than this one.”
The Rationale for the Metaphor: He went on to describe Article 32 as “the very soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it.” His profound rationale was that a mere declaration of fundamental rights on paper is absolutely meaningless and practically useless unless there is an effective, rapid, and guaranteed constitutional machinery to legally enforce them against the State.
Supreme Court as the Ultimate Guarantor: Article 32 technically makes the Supreme Court the ultimate defender and guarantor of fundamental rights. The right to constitutional remedies is itself a fundamental right, meaning the Supreme Court generally cannot refuse to entertain a genuine petition seeking the enforcement of Part III rights, making it the most powerful, non-derogable tool in the hands of the Indian citizens.

📌 Constitutional Remedies

Q.18) Which writ literally means “to have the body of” and is issued by the court to set a detained person free if the detention is found to be illegal?

Ans > Habeas Corpus

Etymology and Significance: The legal term ‘Habeas Corpus’ is directly derived from a Latin phrase that literally translates to “you may have the body” or “to have the body of.” In constitutional law, it is arguably the most powerful, famous, and frequently utilized writ in the direct context of protecting personal liberty.
The Judicial Command: It is a high prerogative writ issued strictly by a constitutional court (the Supreme Court under Art 32 or a High Court under Art 226) essentially in the form of a strict legal command directed at any person or authority who has detained another individual. The writ physically forces the detainer to produce the body of the detained person directly before the court.
Examining Legality: Once the person is physically produced, the court rigorously examines the legal cause, justification, and procedures surrounding the detention. If the court determines that the detention is arbitrary, lacks firm legal backing, or violates established constitutional procedures, it immediately orders the unconditional release of the detained person.
The Ultimate Bulwark: This writ acts as the ultimate constitutional bulwark against illegal, secret, or arbitrary detentions by the executive, police forces, or even private individuals. Importantly, a petition for Habeas Corpus can be filed not only by the detained person themselves but also by any interested relative or friend acting on their behalf, recognizing that a detained person may be physically incapacitated or in solitary confinement.

📌 Constitutional Remedies

Q.19) Which writ is issued by the court to a public official asking him to perform his official duties that he has failed or refused to perform?

Ans > Mandamus

The Command to Perform: The term ‘Mandamus’ is a Latin legal word that literally translates to “we command.” It is a highly authoritative and frequently used writ issued by a superior constitutional court to compel the performance of a mandatory legal or public duty.
Targeting Public Authorities: This writ is specifically issued as a strict judicial command to a public official, public body, inferior court, tribunal, or government corporation, explicitly directing them to physically perform their official, statutory duties that they have unlawfully failed, neglected, or outright refused to perform despite being legally bound to do so.
Enforcing Public Duties: Mandamus is primarily utilized to enforce public duties and ensure that the government machinery functions according to the law of the land. It can also be creatively issued to command a public authority to explicitly refrain from doing a particular act that they are not legally authorized to do.
Strict Limitations: However, the scope of Mandamus has strict legal limitations. It absolutely cannot be issued against a private individual or a purely private organization with no public duties. Furthermore, it cannot be issued to force a public official to perform a duty that is purely discretionary rather than mandatory, nor can it be issued against the President of India or State Governors for the performance of their core executive duties.

📌 Exceptional Provisions

Q.20) Article 33 empowers Parliament to restrict or abrogate the fundamental rights of the members of the armed forces to:

Ans > Ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them

Exclusive Parliamentary Power: Article 33 is a unique constitutional provision that explicitly grants the Indian Parliament the absolute, exclusive legislative power to drastically restrict or completely abrogate the fundamental rights of specific categories of government personnel. State legislatures have absolutely zero power to make laws regarding this article.
Targeted Personnel: This constitutional restriction specifically targets the members of the armed forces (Army, Navy, Air Force), paramilitary forces, police forces across all states, intelligence agencies (like RAW and IB), and analogous organizations deeply involved in maintaining national security, telecommunications, and public order.
The Rationale of Discipline: The fundamental objective behind empowering Parliament with this severe restrictive capability is highly pragmatic and essential for state survival: it is absolutely critical to ensure the proper, unquestioning discharge of their sensitive duties and to maintain the highest levels of strict operational discipline among them.
Legislative Implementation: Utilizing this specific constitutional power, Parliament has enacted several strict laws, such as the Army Act, Navy Act, and Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Act. These highly stringent laws legally prohibit these personnel from exercising standard fundamental liberties, such as forming political associations, joining labor unions, protesting, communicating freely with the press, or publicly questioning operational commands, ensuring a totally unified and disciplined security apparatus.

📌 DPSP Structure

Q.21) The Directive Principles of State Policy are enumerated in the Constitution from:

Ans > Articles 36 to 51

The Constitutional Blueprint: The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) are systematically and elaborately enumerated in Part IV of the Indian Constitution, completely covering Articles 36 to 51. These principles represent a comprehensive socio-economic manifesto and philosophical blueprint for the governance of the modern Indian nation.
Irish Inspiration: The framers of the Indian Constitution were profoundly influenced by the Irish Constitution of 1937, from which they directly borrowed this novel concept of state directives. The Irish, in turn, had adapted the idea from the earlier Spanish Constitution, showcasing a global flow of constitutional ideas.
Guiding Instructions: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar highly praised the Directive Principles, officially describing them as the “novel features” of the Indian Constitution. They are structurally intended to act as a constant guiding light, serving as vital instructions or constitutional recommendations to both the Union and State legislatures and the massive executive machinery when formulating policies.
Goal of Socio-Economic Democracy: While Fundamental Rights primarily aim to establish political democracy by guaranteeing individual civil liberties, the overarching objective of the DPSP is entirely different and vastly more ambitious: they are explicitly designed to establish profound social and economic democracy, relentlessly driving the country towards the ultimate goal of becoming a true ‘welfare state’ rather than a colonial ‘police state’.

📌 DPSP Amendments

Q.22) Which Constitutional Amendment Act added four new Directive Principles, including the directive to “promote equal justice and to provide free legal aid to the poor” (Article 39 A)?

Ans > 42nd Amendment Act (1976)

The Mini-Constitution: The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976, enacted during the highly controversial period of the internal Emergency, was so massive and sweeping in its scope that it is often colloquially referred to by scholars as the “Mini-Constitution.” Among its many profound changes, it significantly bolstered and expanded the Directive Principles of State Policy.
Expanding the State’s Mandate: This specific amendment boldly added four entirely new Directive Principles to Part IV, demanding much more proactive socialist, legal, and environmental action from the State machinery. The most prominent and impactful among these was the insertion of Article 39A.
Ensuring Legal Equality: Article 39A places a strict constitutional obligation on the State to systematically “promote equal justice and to provide free legal aid to the poor.” This ensures that opportunities for securing legal justice are not fundamentally denied to any citizen strictly by reason of severe economic poverty or other social disabilities, a reality that plagued the Indian justice system.
Other Key Additions: In addition to 39A, the 42nd Amendment also added crucial directives to secure opportunities for the healthy development of children (Article 39), to ensure the active, formalized participation of workers in the management of industries (Article 43A), and to fiercely protect and radically improve the environment while safeguarding forests and wildlife (Article 48A).

📌 Classification of DPSP

Q.23) The Directive Principles which reflect the programme of reconstruction enunciated by Gandhi during the national movement are known as:

Ans > Gandhian Principles

Ideological Grouping: Although the Constitution of India itself does not formally or explicitly classify the Directive Principles of State Policy into specific ideological categories, legal scholars and constitutional historians universally group them into three broad categories based on their underlying philosophy and content to make them easier to study.
Reflecting the Freedom Struggle: One of these primary, highly influential categories is known as the ‘Gandhian Principles’. These specific directives heavily reflect the core socio-economic programme of reconstruction that Mahatma Gandhi constantly enunciated and passionately fought for during the long decades of the Indian national independence movement.
Focus on Decentralization: The framers deliberately included these specific principles in the Constitution to fulfill Gandhi’s ultimate dreams for a highly decentralized, rural-centric India. They focus heavily on grassroots political empowerment, rural upliftment, and indigenous economic models rather than massive, western-style heavy industrialization.
Key Examples: Prominent examples of these Gandhian constitutional directives include Article 40 (which mandates the State to organize autonomous, powerful village panchayats), Article 43 (which promotes the development of rural cottage industries on an individual or co-operative basis), and Article 47 (which explicitly directs the State to bring about the total prohibition of the consumption of intoxicating drinks and harmful drugs).

📌 Classification of DPSP

Q.24) Which of the following is a Liberal-Intellectual Principle?

Ans > To separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services (Article 50)

The Philosophy of Modernity: The specific category of ‘Liberal-Intellectual Principles’ within the DPSP reflects the core ideology of modern, progressive Western liberalism. These principles are heavily focused on establishing a rational, highly secular, environmentally conscious, and legally uniform administrative framework for the newly independent nation.
The Mandate of Article 50: Article 50 is a paramount, textbook example of a Liberal-Intellectual principle. It explicitly directs the State to take active, systemic, and permanent steps to completely separate the judiciary from the executive branch within the public services of the State, moving away from colonial administrative models.
Ensuring Judicial Independence: This separation is absolutely crucial for the basic functioning of a true democracy and the rule of law. If executive officers (like District Collectors or police chiefs) also possess vast judicial powers to try cases, the impartiality of the justice system is severely compromised. Separation ensures a totally independent, fearless judiciary capable of holding the executive accountable.
Other Liberal Directives: Other notable directives that fall strictly under this Liberal-Intellectual category include the mandate to secure a Uniform Civil Code for all citizens (Article 44), the provision of early childhood care and education (Article 45), the protection of monuments of national historical importance (Article 49), and the promotion of international peace and security (Article 51).

📌 Nature of DPSP

Q.25) Which Article states that the Directive Principles are non-justiciable but “are fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws”?

Ans > Article 37

Defining Enforceability: Article 37 explicitly and clearly defines the fundamental legal nature and court enforceability of the Directive Principles of State Policy. It clearly declares that the provisions contained in Part IV “shall not be enforceable by any court,” establishing a sharp contrast with Fundamental Rights.
The Reality of Non-Justiciability: This non-justiciable nature means that if the government completely fails to implement a directive (for example, failing to provide a uniform civil code or failing to prohibit alcohol), a citizen absolutely cannot take the government to court to legally force them to implement it. They lack the legal teeth of Part III.
The Moral Compass: However, Article 37 immediately and powerfully balances this by stating that these principles “are nevertheless fundamental in the governance of the country.” This makes them the ultimate philosophical, socio-economic, and moral compass for the nation’s administration, setting the benchmark for good governance.
The Ultimate Duty: Furthermore, the Article imposes a massive, undeniable political and moral obligation on the State, declaring that “it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws.” While courts cannot enforce them, the ultimate check lies with the voting public, who can judge a government’s performance based on its success or failure in implementing these constitutional directives during democratic elections.

📌 DPSP vs Fundamental Rights

Q.26) In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court held that the Indian Constitution is founded on the bedrock of the balance between:

Ans > The Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles

A History of Conflict: For decades following independence, a massive constitutional and political tug-of-war existed regarding the exact relationship and legal primacy between Fundamental Rights (Part III) and the Directive Principles (Part IV). The Parliament often tried to legally amend basic rights to aggressively implement socialist directives, leading to constant, bitter Supreme Court battles.
The Landmark Resolution: The landmark Minerva Mills vs. Union of India case in 1980 finally and conclusively settled this turbulent legal debate. The Supreme Court decisively struck down a controversial provision of the 42nd Amendment that had attempted to give total primacy and supremacy to all Directive Principles over the Fundamental Rights.
The Concept of Constitutional Balance: The Supreme Court famously and eloquently held that the Indian Constitution is firmly founded on the bedrock of the “balance” between Part III and Part IV. The Court clearly stated that to give absolute primacy to one over the other is to violently disturb the intrinsic harmony of the Constitution.
The Chariot Metaphor: Using a powerful and lasting metaphor, the judges declared that the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles are exactly like the two vital wheels of a chariot. One cannot function effectively without the other. They are deeply complementary; while Fundamental Rights provide the means (liberty), the Directive Principles provide the ends (a welfare state), and both must exist in perfect harmony for the nation to progress.

📌 DPSP Amendments

Q.27) The 97th Amendment Act of 2011 added a new Directive Principle (Article 43B) relating to:

Ans > Co-operative societies

Revitalizing the Co-operative Movement: The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act, passed in the year 2011, was a major legislative milestone aimed entirely at revitalizing and deeply protecting the massive cooperative movement across rural and urban India. It provided co-operative societies with a strong constitutional status and unprecedented legal protection.
Comprehensive Constitutional Changes: This sweeping amendment made significant changes across the entire Constitution. It successfully made the right to form co-operative societies a formal Fundamental Right by amending Article 19. It also added a completely new Part IX-B specifically detailing the operational and democratic rules for co-operative societies.
The New Directive Mandate: Crucially, it inserted a brand-new Directive Principle, Article 43B, straight into Part IV of the Constitution. This new directive explicitly mandates that the State shall endeavor to passionately promote the voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control, and highly professional management of co-operative societies across the country.
Aligning with Gandhian Economics: This critical addition perfectly aligned with the older Gandhian economic philosophy already present in the DPSP. By deeply constitutionalizing co-operatives, the central government aimed to severely shield them from arbitrary political interference by state governments, ensuring they function as true democratic institutions of grassroots economic empowerment for farmers, artisans, and rural workers.

📌 Significance of DPSP

Q.28) Who opined that the Directive Principles are aimed at furthering the goals of the social revolution?

Ans > Granville Austin

The Preeminent Scholar: Granville Austin was a highly acclaimed American historian and a leading global authority on the framing, history, and working of the Indian Constitution. His deep, scholarly analysis thoroughly explored the philosophical intent and the complex debates of the Constituent Assembly.
The Engine of Social Revolution: Austin famously and accurately opined that the primary purpose of the Directive Principles of State Policy is to actively further the ultimate goals of a profound “social revolution” in India, aiming to fundamentally transform a highly unequal, caste-ridden, colonial society into a modern, egalitarian welfare state.
Independence as a Means, Not an End: He eloquently argued that the political independence achieved in 1947 was essentially meaningless without this subsequent, massive social and economic revolution. The DPSP were explicitly and carefully drafted by the framers to serve as the master blueprint and primary vehicle for executing this massive socio-economic transformation over the coming decades.
The Conscience of the Constitution: Furthermore, Austin remarkably described the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles, when read closely together, as the true “conscience of the Constitution.” He recognized that while they operate differently legally (one being enforceable, the other not), they are completely united in their ultimate goal of achieving a deeply just, equitable, and democratic society for all Indian citizens.

📌 Implementation of DPSP

Q.29) The Lok Adalat, a statutory forum for conciliatory settlement of legal disputes, was established to fulfill the Directive Principle of providing free legal aid. It was set up under which Act?

Ans > The Legal Services Authorities Act (1987)

Fulfilling the 42nd Amendment: Article 39A, added by the 42nd Amendment, strongly directs the State to ensure that the legal system promotes justice on a basis of absolute equal opportunity, and specifically mandates the provision of free legal aid to ensure no citizen is denied justice due to poverty.
The Statutory Framework: To structurally and practically fulfill this massive constitutional directive, the Indian Parliament enacted the Legal Services Authorities Act in 1987. This highly significant legislation established a nationwide, systemic framework for providing free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of society.
The Birth of the People’s Court: One of the most critical and successful innovations born out of this specific Act was the formal, statutory establishment of the ‘Lok Adalat’ (literally meaning People’s Court). Lok Adalats function strictly as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, operating outside the highly formal, intimidating, and deeply backlogged regular court systems.
Delivering Accessible Justice: They focus entirely on the rapid, conciliatory settlement of pending legal disputes and pre-litigation matters strictly through negotiation and compromise. Because they involve zero court fees, highly simplified procedures, and rapid resolutions, Lok Adalats have become the most effective tool for actually delivering on the DPSP’s promise of accessible, free legal aid to the impoverished masses.

📌 Directives outside Part IV

Q.30) Which Directive (outside Part IV) states that it shall be the endeavour of every state to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups?

Ans > Article 350-A

Locating External Directives: While Part IV (Articles 36 to 51) contains the core bulk of the Directive Principles of State Policy, the framers of the Constitution strategically placed a few other highly important directives in entirely different parts of the Constitution. These are often academically called ‘Directives outside Part IV’.
The Genesis of Article 350-A: One of the most crucial of these external directives is Article 350-A, which is located in Part XVII (Official Language) of the Constitution. It was inserted specifically by the 7th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1956, based heavily on the strong recommendations of the States Reorganisation Commission.
The Mandate for Mother-Tongue: Article 350-A places a strong constitutional directive on every state and local authority within the state to endeavor to provide completely adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue specifically at the primary stage of education to all children belonging to linguistic minority groups.
Cultural and Cognitive Importance: This directive is deeply essential for the massive cultural and educational protection of minorities in a highly linguistically diverse nation like India. Pedagogically, it ensures that young children grasp fundamental educational concepts much better by learning in their native language during their formative years, while simultaneously preventing the rapid erosion of minority languages and regional dialects across the country.

📌 Quick Summary — Polity Set 12

Fundamental Rights Scope: Enshrined in Part III, spanning Articles 12 to 35.
State Definition: Article 12 includes private bodies acting as state instruments.
Universal Rights: Article 21 (Life & Liberty) protects citizens and foreigners alike.
Equality: Article 14’s “equal protection” originates from the US Constitution.
Non-Discrimination: Article 15 bans discrimination in public access based on race, religion, etc.
Reservations: 93rd Amendment (2005) introduced a 27% OBC quota in educational institutions.
Untouchability: Article 17 abolishes it and applies horizontally against private individuals.
Property Rights: Removed from Article 19 freedoms; now a legal right.
Legal Protections: Article 20 protects against double jeopardy; Menaka case (1978) established “due process” logic for Article 21.
Education Right: Article 21A guarantees elementary education (6-14 years) as a right.
Arrest Protections: First part of Article 22 handles ordinary laws; Article 23 bans ‘begar’ (forced unremunerated work).
Cultural Conservation: Article 29 allows any section of citizens (majority or minority) to conserve their language/culture.
Constitutional Remedies: Article 32 is the “soul” of the Constitution; Habeas Corpus frees illegal detainees, Mandamus commands public duty.
Armed Forces: Article 33 allows Parliament to restrict rights to maintain discipline.
DPSP Scope: Contained in Part IV, Articles 36 to 51; Non-justiciable but fundamental to governance (Article 37).
New Directives: 42nd Amendment added free legal aid (39A); 97th added co-operatives (43B).
Categories: Includes Gandhian (e.g., Panchayats) and Liberal-Intellectual (e.g., Judiciary separation – Article 50).
Constitutional Balance: Minerva Mills case (1980) cemented the balance between Rights and DPSP.
Directives outside Part IV: Article 350-A mandates mother-tongue instruction at the primary stage for linguistic minorities.

Timer ⏳

20:00

Progress (0/30)

Click any card to flip and reveal the summarized answer!

Smart Review: Questions you got wrong appear here for focused study.

Navigation Menu

Polity Set 12

Q.1) The Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution are enshrined in Part III from Articles:

Q.2) Which Fundamental Right is available to BOTH citizens and foreigners (except enemy aliens)?

Q.3) Article 12 defines the term ‘State’ for the purposes of Part III. According to the Supreme Court, this definition even includes:

Q.4) The concept of ‘equal protection of laws’ found in Article 14 has been taken from the:

Q.5) Which Article states that no citizen shall be subjected to any disability on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth with regard to access to shops, public restaurants, and hotels?

Q.6) Which Constitutional Amendment Act provided a quota of 27% for candidates belonging to the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in central higher educational institutions (exception to Article 15)?

Q.7) Who was the chairman of the Second Backward Classes Commission appointed in 1979?

Q.8) Article 17 abolishes ‘untouchability’. The Supreme Court held that the right under Article 17 is available against:

Q.9) Article 19 protects six rights regarding freedom. Which of the following is NOT one of these six rights currently?

Q.10) According to Article 20, the protection against “double jeopardy” means:

Q.11) In which case did the Supreme Court overrule its judgement in the Gopalan case, ruling that the right to life and personal liberty can be deprived by a law only if the procedure is reasonable, fair, and just?

Q.12) Article 21A, added by the 86th Amendment Act of 2002, makes which type of education a Fundamental Right?

Q.13) Which part of Article 22 grants protection to persons who are arrested or detained under an ordinary law (not preventive detention)?

Q.14) Article 23 prohibits traffic in human beings and ‘begar’. The term ‘begar’ means:

Q.15) Under Article 25, the explanation clarifies that the term ‘Hindus’ includes:

Q.16) Article 29 provides that any section of the citizens having a distinct language, script, or culture shall have the right to conserve it. The Supreme Court held that this right is available to:

Q.17) Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called which Article “the very soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it”?

Q.18) Which writ literally means “to have the body of” and is issued by the court to set a detained person free if the detention is found to be illegal?

Q.19) Which writ is issued by the court to a public official asking him to perform his official duties that he has failed or refused to perform?

Q.20) Article 33 empowers Parliament to restrict or abrogate the fundamental rights of the members of the armed forces to:

Q.21) The Directive Principles of State Policy are enumerated in the Constitution from:

Q.22) Which Constitutional Amendment Act added four new Directive Principles, including the directive to “promote equal justice and to provide free legal aid to the poor” (Article 39 A)?

Q.23) The Directive Principles which reflect the programme of reconstruction enunciated by Gandhi during the national movement are known as:

Q.24) Which of the following is a Liberal-Intellectual Principle?

Q.25) Which Article states that the Directive Principles are non-justiciable but “are fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws”?

Q.26) In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court held that the Indian Constitution is founded on the bedrock of the balance between:

Q.27) The 97th Amendment Act of 2011 added a new Directive Principle (Article 43B) relating to:

Q.28) Who opined that the Directive Principles are aimed at furthering the goals of the social revolution?

Q.29) The Lok Adalat, a statutory forum for conciliatory settlement of legal disputes, was established to fulfill the Directive Principle of providing free legal aid. It was set up under which Act?

Q.30) Which Directive (outside Part IV) states that it shall be the endeavour of every state to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups?

📌 Quick Summary — Polity Set 12

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Q.1) The Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution are enshrined in Part III from Articles:

Q.2) Which Fundamental Right is available to BOTH citizens and foreigners (except enemy aliens)?

Q.3) Article 12 defines the term ‘State’ for the purposes of Part III. According to the Supreme Court, this definition even includes:

Q.4) The concept of ‘equal protection of laws’ found in Article 14 has been taken from the:

Q.5) Which Article states that no citizen shall be subjected to any disability on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth with regard to access to shops, public restaurants, and hotels?

Q.6) Which Constitutional Amendment Act provided a quota of 27% for candidates belonging to the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in central higher educational institutions (exception to Article 15)?

Q.7) Who was the chairman of the Second Backward Classes Commission appointed in 1979?

Q.8) Article 17 abolishes ‘untouchability’. The Supreme Court held that the right under Article 17 is available against:

Q.9) Article 19 protects six rights regarding freedom. Which of the following is NOT one of these six rights currently?

Q.10) According to Article 20, the protection against “double jeopardy” means:

Q.11) In which case did the Supreme Court overrule its judgement in the Gopalan case, ruling that the right to life and personal liberty can be deprived by a law only if the procedure is reasonable, fair, and just?

Q.12) Article 21A, added by the 86th Amendment Act of 2002, makes which type of education a Fundamental Right?

Q.13) Which part of Article 22 grants protection to persons who are arrested or detained under an ordinary law (not preventive detention)?

Q.14) Article 23 prohibits traffic in human beings and ‘begar’. The term ‘begar’ means:

Q.15) Under Article 25, the explanation clarifies that the term ‘Hindus’ includes:

Q.16) Article 29 provides that any section of the citizens having a distinct language, script, or culture shall have the right to conserve it. The Supreme Court held that this right is available to:

Q.17) Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called which Article “the very soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it”?

Q.18) Which writ literally means “to have the body of” and is issued by the court to set a detained person free if the detention is found to be illegal?

Q.19) Which writ is issued by the court to a public official asking him to perform his official duties that he has failed or refused to perform?

Q.20) Article 33 empowers Parliament to restrict or abrogate the fundamental rights of the members of the armed forces to:

Q.21) The Directive Principles of State Policy are enumerated in the Constitution from:

Q.22) Which Constitutional Amendment Act added four new Directive Principles, including the directive to “promote equal justice and to provide free legal aid to the poor” (Article 39 A)?

Q.23) The Directive Principles which reflect the programme of reconstruction enunciated by Gandhi during the national movement are known as:

Q.24) Which of the following is a Liberal-Intellectual Principle?

Q.25) Which Article states that the Directive Principles are non-justiciable but “are fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws”?

Q.26) In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court held that the Indian Constitution is founded on the bedrock of the balance between:

Q.27) The 97th Amendment Act of 2011 added a new Directive Principle (Article 43B) relating to:

Q.28) Who opined that the Directive Principles are aimed at furthering the goals of the social revolution?

Q.29) The Lok Adalat, a statutory forum for conciliatory settlement of legal disputes, was established to fulfill the Directive Principle of providing free legal aid. It was set up under which Act?

Q.30) Which Directive (outside Part IV) states that it shall be the endeavour of every state to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups?

📌 Quick Summary — Polity Set 12

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Current Affairs

Month wise Current Affairs