Polity Set 175
🔍
📌 Statutory Bodies • NHRC
Q.1) According to the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2019, what is the term of office for the Chairperson and Members of the NHRC?
Ans > 3 years or up to 70 years of age
- The 2019 Legislative Amendment: The Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act of 2019 brought significant structural changes to the NHRC. Before this amendment was passed, the mandated term for the Chairperson and its members was five years. The government reduced this to three years to harmonize the tenure with other national statutory commissions.
- Rationale for the Age Limit: The upper age limit of 70 years is highly specific to the judiciary. Because the NHRC Chairperson is traditionally required to be a retired Chief Justice of India or a retired Supreme Court Judge (who retire at age 65), the 70-year ceiling provides a practical, five-year post-retirement window for them to serve.
- Broadening of Eligibility: Alongside the tenure reduction, the 2019 amendment also broadened the eligibility criteria. It allowed a judge of the Supreme Court, not just the Chief Justice, to be appointed as the Chairperson, thereby increasing the pool of eligible candidates and preventing prolonged vacancies in the commission’s leadership.
📌 Statutory Bodies • SHRC
Q.2) A State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) Chairperson and its members are appointed by the Governor. Who has the authority to remove them from office?
Ans > The President of India
- Unique Appointment vs. Removal Dynamic: The SHRC presents a rare constitutional and statutory dynamic where the appointing authority is different from the removing authority. While the State Governor appoints the members based on the recommendation of a state-level committee, the power of removal is exclusively vested in the President of India to ensure absolute independence from state political pressures.
- Strict Grounds for Removal: The President cannot remove SHRC members arbitrarily. Removal is only permissible on specific grounds such as proven misbehavior, constitutional incapacity, engaging in paid employment outside their office duties, or being declared an insolvent by a competent court.
- Role of the Supreme Court: In cases where a member is accused of “proved misbehavior or incapacity,” the President must refer the matter to the Supreme Court of India for a formal inquiry. The President can only execute the removal if the Supreme Court, after its investigation, upholds the charges and recommends the dismissal.
📌 Statutory Bodies • RTI
Q.3) Under the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019, the term of office for the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) and Information Commissioners at the Central and State levels is:
Ans > Prescribed by the Central Government
- Departure from the 2005 Original Act: When the Right to Information Act was originally enacted in 2005, it provided a fixed statutory tenure of five years (or up to age 65) for Information Commissioners. This fixed term was designed to guarantee functional autonomy, insulating the commissioners from executive interference while handling sensitive transparency requests.
- The 2019 Amendment Controversy: The 2019 amendment removed this fixed tenure, instead granting the Central Government the delegated power to prescribe the term limits, salaries, and allowances through executive rules. Critics argued this could compromise the independence of the Information Commission by making it subordinate to the executive branch.
- Government’s Statutory Rationale: The Central Government defended the amendment by arguing that the original 2005 Act erroneously equated Information Commissioners (a statutory body) with Election Commissioners (a constitutional body). By taking the power to prescribe the term (subsequently set to three years), the government aimed to correct this legal anomaly and standardize statutory appointments.
📌 Executive Bodies • CBI
Q.4) The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was set up in 1963 by a resolution of the Ministry of Home Affairs. It currently functions under the administrative control of which Ministry?
Ans > Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
- Origin and the Santhanam Committee: The CBI was not established by an act of Parliament; it was formed via an executive resolution by the Ministry of Home Affairs in 1963. Its creation was heavily influenced by the recommendations of the Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption, which identified the need for a specialized central agency to tackle high-level graft.
- Transfer of Administrative Control: Although born in the Home Ministry, the administrative control of the CBI was later transferred to the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT). The DoPT falls directly under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, a portfolio traditionally held by the Prime Minister of India, highlighting the agency’s critical importance.
- Derivation of Police Powers: Because the CBI is not a statutory body on its own, it derives its legal powers to investigate crimes from the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act of 1946. This legal framework requires the CBI to obtain “general consent” from state governments before operating within their territorial jurisdictions.
📌 Anti-Corruption Bodies • Lokpal
Q.5) The Lokpal has jurisdiction to inquire into allegations of corruption against the Prime Minister of India. However, the Lokpal CANNOT inquire into allegations against the PM relating to:
Ans > All of the above
- The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013: Following the massive anti-corruption movement in India, the Lokpal Act was passed to create an ombudsman capable of investigating high-ranking public officials. Notably, the Prime Minister was brought under its purview, ending years of debate about executive immunity at the highest level of government.
- National Security Safeguards: While the PM is covered, strict subject-matter exemptions exist. The Lokpal is legally barred from inquiring into corruption allegations against the PM if they involve international relations, external affairs, public order, atomic energy, space, or internal security. This prevents sensitive national security matters from being paralyzed by frivolous complaints.
- Stringent Inquiry Procedures: Even for non-exempt subjects, an inquiry against the Prime Minister requires a highly specific procedural threshold. A full bench of the Lokpal must convene to consider the initiation of the inquiry, and it can only proceed if at least two-thirds of the members approve it, ensuring that investigations are firmly grounded in evidence.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Right to Equality
Q.6) Which Article of the Constitution explicitly states that “The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them”?
Ans > Article 15(1)
- Significance of the Word “Only”: The most critical constitutional nuance in Article 15(1) is the inclusion of the word “only.” It means that discrimination based solely on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth is prohibited. However, the State can discriminate if these grounds are combined with other valid, rational criteria (such as physical fitness for military service).
- Citizens vs. Non-Citizens: Unlike Article 14 (Equality before the law), which applies to any person on Indian soil (including foreigners and corporations), Article 15 is an exclusive Fundamental Right reserved strictly for Indian citizens. Foreign nationals cannot invoke Article 15 to claim protection against discrimination by the Indian State.
- Foundation for Social Justice: Article 15(1) serves as the bedrock for modern Indian civil rights. It prevents the State from maintaining exclusionary public policies and directly led to subsequent clauses (like 15(3) and 15(4)) which allow the State to practice positive discrimination, or affirmative action, to uplift marginalized communities and women.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Amendments
Q.7) Article 15(4) empowers the State to make special provisions for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes. This clause was added by which Amendment?
Ans > 1st Amendment Act (1951)
- The Champakam Dorairajan Catalyst: Article 15(4) was born out of judicial conflict. In the famous State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951) case, the Supreme Court struck down communal quotas in educational institutions, ruling they violated Article 15(1) and Article 29(2). This threatened the government’s entire social justice framework.
- Resolving the DPSP Conflict: The Supreme Court held that Directive Principles (specifically Article 46, which promotes the educational interests of weaker sections) could not override Fundamental Rights. To bypass this judicial roadblock and protect affirmative action, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru’s government quickly moved the 1st Constitutional Amendment.
- Nature of the Provision: Article 15(4) is an “enabling provision.” It does not grant a fundamental right to citizens to demand reservations; rather, it empowers the State to create special policies (like reduced fees, relaxed qualifying marks, or seat quotas in educational institutions) for the advancement of backward classes, SCs, and STs without violating the equality principle.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Amendments
Q.8) Article 16(4B) allows the State to carry forward unfilled reserved vacancies to subsequent years without being subject to the 50% ceiling cap. This was added by which Amendment?
Ans > 81st Amendment Act (2000)
- The Indra Sawhney Precedent: In the landmark 1992 Indra Sawhney judgment (the Mandal Commission case), the Supreme Court established a strict rule: total reservations in public employment cannot exceed a 50% ceiling in any given year. This created a major administrative hurdle for filling backlog vacancies reserved for SC/ST categories.
- The Carry Forward Rule Dilemma: When reserved seats went unfilled due to a lack of suitable candidates, they were “carried forward” to the next recruitment cycle. However, combining these backlog seats with the current year’s quota often pushed the total reservation above the 50% limit, leading courts to strike down the recruitment drives.
- Legislative Remedy: To permanently protect the interests of SCs and STs, the Parliament enacted the 81st Amendment in 2000. It inserted Article 16(4B), which legally separated backlog reserved vacancies from current year vacancies. It declared that unfilled reserved seats treated as a separate class would not be counted toward the 50% ceiling of the year they are finally filled.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Right to Freedom
Q.9) Which of the following Fundamental Rights is guaranteed under Article 19 but can be restricted on the grounds of “security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to an offence”?
Ans > Freedom of speech and expression
- The Concept of Reasonable Restrictions: The Indian Constitution does not grant absolute freedoms. Unlike the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which is framed in absolute terms, Article 19 of the Indian Constitution explicitly lists “reasonable restrictions” within the text itself to balance individual liberty with national security and societal harmony.
- The First Amendment Addition: Originally, the grounds for restricting free speech did not include “public order” or “friendly relations with foreign States.” These specific conditions were rapidly added by the First Constitutional Amendment Act of 1951 to give the government broader policing powers to quell civil unrest and manage diplomacy without judicial interference.
- Judicial Review: The term “reasonable” is the critical safeguard here. The State cannot simply restrict speech arbitrarily; the restriction must be logically connected to the grounds mentioned in Article 19(2). The Supreme Court retains the ultimate authority to strike down any censorship law if it finds the restriction disproportionate, excessive, or unreasonable.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Protection in Conviction
Q.10) Article 20(3) of the Constitution guarantees protection against “Self-Incrimination”. What does this mean?
Ans > No person accused of any offense shall be compelled to be a witness against themselves.
- The Right to Silence: The protection against self-incrimination is a fundamental tenet of criminal jurisprudence, heavily inspired by the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. It ensures that an accused person has the “right to silence” and cannot be tortured, coerced, or forced by police investigating agencies to make a confession that proves their own guilt.
- Scope of “Witness”: The Supreme Court has clarified that being compelled to be a “witness” generally refers to imparting personal knowledge or testimony. The protection applies to both oral confessions and written statements extracted under duress during police interrogations or trials.
- Exceptions for Material Evidence: Article 20(3) has strict boundaries. The Supreme Court has ruled that compelling an accused to give physical evidence—such as fingerprints, blood samples, DNA swabs, voice samples, or standing in an identification parade—does not violate the protection against self-incrimination, as these are objective materials, not subjective testimonies.
📌 Directive Principles • Education
Q.11) The 86th Amendment Act (2002) altered the subject matter of Article 45 in the Directive Principles. What does the revised Article 45 direct the State to provide?
Ans > Early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years
- The Unnikrishnan Judgment Impact: Before 2002, Article 45 directed the State to provide free and compulsory education for all children up to 14 years. However, in the 1993 Unnikrishnan case, the Supreme Court declared that education up to age 14 was a Fundamental Right implicit in the Right to Life (Article 21), forcing a constitutional update.
- The Triple Amendment Strategy: The 86th Amendment Act fundamentally restructured education in the Constitution. It elevated education for children aged 6 to 14 to a Fundamental Right under the newly created Article 21A. It also added a new Fundamental Duty under Article 51A(k) for parents to provide educational opportunities to their children.
- Refocusing Article 45: Because the 6-14 age bracket was moved to Fundamental Rights, Article 45 was left empty. The amendment altered its text to focus on Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) for children between 0 to 6 years. This DPSP now guides government initiatives like the Anganwadi system and pre-primary nutrition programs.
📌 Fundamental Duties • Article 51A
Q.12) The Fundamental Duty to “strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement” is listed under which clause of Article 51A?
Ans > Article 51A(j)
- The Swaran Singh Committee: Fundamental Duties were not part of the original Constitution drafted in 1950. They were recommended by the Swaran Singh Committee during the Internal Emergency and subsequently inserted by the 42nd Amendment Act in 1976. The goal was to remind citizens that enjoying rights comes with reciprocal obligations to the nation.
- Significance of Clause (j): While most Fundamental Duties are protective (protecting the environment, public property, or national flag), Article 51A(j) is uniquely aspirational. It legally frames the pursuit of individual excellence and hard work as a patriotic duty, directly linking the personal success of citizens to the collective progress of the Indian state.
- Non-Justiciable Nature: Like all Fundamental Duties, Article 51A(j) is non-justiciable. This means the State cannot forcibly prosecute or jail a citizen for failing to “strive towards excellence.” However, courts frequently use this clause to interpret laws and uphold state policies designed to promote merit, scientific research, and educational excellence.
📌 Constitutional History • Amendments
Q.13) Who was the President of India when the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act (1978) was enacted, officially giving assent to the bill?
Ans > Neelam Sanjiva Reddy
- The Post-Emergency Political Climate: The 44th Amendment was introduced by the Morarji Desai-led Janata Party government. Its primary political objective was to undo the massive centralizing distortions and authoritarian provisions introduced by Indira Gandhi’s 42nd Amendment during the 1975-1977 National Emergency.
- Neelam Sanjiva Reddy’s Historic Term: Neelam Sanjiva Reddy holds a unique distinction in Indian political history. Following the lifting of the Emergency and the massive defeat of the Congress party, he was elected as the sixth President of India in 1977 unopposed—the only President in India’s history to achieve this feat. He officially signed the 44th Amendment into law.
- Rebalancing Presidential Power: Ironically, the 44th Amendment, which Reddy signed, directly impacted his own office. While the 42nd Amendment had made the advice of the Cabinet entirely binding on the President, the 44th Amendment allowed the President (Reddy, at the time) the power to send advice back to the Cabinet for reconsideration exactly once.
📌 Constitutional Amendments • State Powers
Q.14) The 105th Constitutional Amendment Act (2021) was enacted to clarify and restore the power of State governments. What power was restored?
Ans > The power to identify and maintain a state list of Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (OBCs)
- The Fallout of the 102nd Amendment: In 2018, the 102nd Amendment granted constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC). However, its ambiguous drafting led the Supreme Court, during the Maratha Reservation judgment in 2021, to rule that the amendment inadvertently stripped State Governments of their power to identify OBCs, transferring it solely to the President.
- Restoring Federal Structure: The Supreme Court’s ruling caused massive political uproar, as states rely heavily on tailoring local OBC lists for state-level reservations. To correct this judicial interpretation, the Parliament rapidly passed the 105th Amendment Act with unanimous, bipartisan support to explicitly restore state-level powers.
- Dual-List System Legalized: The 105th Amendment clarified that India will maintain two separate lists for backward classes. The Central list, drawn up by the President on NCBC’s advice, applies strictly to central government jobs and institutions. Simultaneously, States retain absolute constitutional authority to formulate their own separate OBC lists for state-specific opportunities.
📌 Constitutional Amendments • Reservation
Q.15) Under the 106th Constitutional Amendment Act (2023) – Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam – the 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies will come into effect:
Ans > After an exercise of delimitation is undertaken based on the figures of the first census published after the Act’s commencement
- Decades-Long Legislative Journey: The concept of reserving one-third of legislative seats for women has been debated in India since the mid-1990s. Earlier iterations of the Women’s Reservation Bill repeatedly failed to pass due to deep political divisions over sub-quotas for marginalized communities. The 106th Amendment successfully cleared both houses in 2023.
- The Delimitation Delay Dependency: The most debated aspect of this amendment is its implementation timeline. The law explicitly states that the 33% reservation will not apply instantly. It is legally tied to the next official Census publication, followed by a nationwide delimitation exercise to redraw constituency boundaries—meaning it will not affect elections until the late 2020s or 2030s.
- Built-in Sunset Clause: The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam contains a “sunset clause.” The constitutional reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies is designed to expire 15 years after its commencement. However, the Parliament retains the legislative authority to extend this period through future amendments if deemed necessary.
📌 Judiciary • High Courts
Q.16) Which Article of the Constitution gives the Parliament the power to establish a common High Court for two or more States or for two or more States and a Union Territory?
Ans > Article 231
- The 7th Amendment Origin: The original Constitution visualized exactly one High Court per state. However, the States Reorganisation Act of 1956 drastically altered state borders, merging and dividing territories. To accommodate this logistical reality, the 7th Constitutional Amendment Act amended Article 231, officially empowering Parliament to establish shared common High Courts.
- Practical Implementation: Parliament has utilized Article 231 extensively to reduce administrative burden and costs in smaller regions. Prominent examples include the Punjab and Haryana High Court (serving two states and the UT of Chandigarh), and the Bombay High Court (serving Maharashtra, Goa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, and Daman and Diu).
- Jurisdictional Autonomy: Even though a High Court might serve multiple states under Article 231, it applies the respective state laws independently depending on where a case originates. The Governor of each constituent state is consulted by the President during the appointment of Judges to these common High Courts.
📌 State Legislature • Legislative Procedure
Q.17) If a State Legislature is unicameral (only a Legislative Assembly), and a Money Bill is passed by it, the Governor can:
Ans > Give assent or withhold assent, but cannot return it for reconsideration
- The Logic of Prior Recommendation: Under the Indian Constitution, a Money Bill (which deals with taxation, government borrowing, or the Consolidated Fund) cannot even be introduced in the State Legislative Assembly without the explicit prior recommendation of the Governor. This procedural rule exists to maintain executive control over state finances.
- Restriction on Reconsideration: Because the Governor has already given prior approval for the introduction of the Money Bill, constitutional convention and Article 200 dictate that it is highly illogical for the Governor to send it back to the Assembly for reconsideration once passed. Therefore, the suspensive veto is constitutionally barred for Money Bills.
- Practical Outcomes: When a Money Bill reaches the Governor’s desk, they realistically have only two viable options: they must either give their assent (which happens 99% of the time) or technically withhold assent (absolute veto). They also possess the power to reserve the Money Bill for the President’s consideration, though this is rare.
📌 State Legislature • Legislative Procedure
Q.18) What is the maximum period a State Legislative Council (in a bicameral state) can delay an Ordinary Bill in the second instance (when the Assembly passes it for the second time and sends it to the Council again)?
Ans > 1 month
- Asymmetrical Bicameralism: State legislatures in India exhibit highly unequal power dynamics compared to the Union Parliament. While the Rajya Sabha enjoys equal power with the Lok Sabha on ordinary bills (requiring joint sittings to resolve deadlocks), a State Legislative Council is practically powerless to stop legislation supported by the State Assembly.
- The First Instance Delay: Under Article 197, when the Legislative Assembly passes an ordinary bill and sends it to the Legislative Council for the very first time, the Council can debate, amend, or stall the bill for a maximum period of three months. After three months, the Assembly can override the delay.
- The Second Instance Constraint: If the Assembly passes the bill a second time (rejecting the Council’s amendments or delays) and sends it back, the Legislative Council is granted only 1 month to delay it further. After this 1-month period, the bill is deemed legally passed by both houses, capping the maximum total delay at 4 months.
📌 Tribunals • Article 323B
Q.19) Article 323B empowers Parliament and State Legislatures to establish Administrative Tribunals for disputes related to specific matters. Which of the following is NOT explicitly covered under Article 323B?
Ans > Inter-state river water disputes
- The 42nd Amendment Tribunals: During the Emergency, the 42nd Amendment (1976) introduced Part XIV-A to the Constitution, creating a framework for specialized tribunals to reduce the massive backlog in traditional courts. It created two distinct articles: 323A (strictly for public service matters) and 323B (for various other specified matters).
- Scope of Article 323B: Article 323B is quite broad, allowing appropriate legislatures to set up tribunals for complex issues requiring specialized adjudication. The text explicitly lists subjects like taxation, foreign exchange, industrial and labor disputes, land reforms, ceiling on urban property, elections to parliament/state legislatures, and rent/tenancy issues.
- Exclusive Domain of Article 262: Inter-state river water disputes are intentionally excluded from 323B because they already have their own dedicated constitutional mechanism. Article 262 deals exclusively with the adjudication of river water disputes, empowering Parliament to form specialized, ad-hoc tribunals (like the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal) whose awards hold the weight of a Supreme Court decree.
📌 Federalism • Seventh Schedule
Q.20) Under the Seventh Schedule, “Public order” and “Police” are subjects listed in the:
Ans > State List
- The Seventh Schedule Architecture: Article 246 of the Constitution divides the legislative and executive powers between the Union and the States using three lists in the Seventh Schedule. This ensures a federal distribution of power. The State List contains subjects of local importance where regional governments need exclusive legislative authority.
- Rationale for Local Control: “Public order” (maintaining general peace) and “Police” (including railway and village police) are placed in the State List (Entries 1 and 2). The framers recognized that law enforcement must be highly decentralized and sensitive to regional cultures, languages, and geography, which a centralized Delhi-based police force could not manage effectively.
- The Delhi Exception: There are notable exceptions to this rule, most prominently the National Capital Territory of Delhi. Due to its unique status as the capital housing vital national infrastructure and foreign diplomats, the subjects of Public Order, Police, and Land are constitutionally stripped from the Delhi government and placed under the direct control of the Union Home Ministry.
📌 Federalism • Seventh Schedule
Q.21) Under the Seventh Schedule, “Education, including technical education, medical education and universities” is listed in the:
Ans > Concurrent List
- The Historical Shift: When the Constitution was enacted in 1950, Education was placed firmly in the State List. The framers believed that states were best equipped to handle regional linguistic and cultural needs in schools. However, this led to massive disparities in educational quality and funding across different Indian states.
- The 42nd Amendment Intervention: To address this imbalance and allow the Central government to create cohesive national policies (like the Right to Education or the National Education Policy), the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 transferred Education from the State List to the Concurrent List. Five major subjects, including forests and weights/measures, were shifted during this time.
- Power Dynamics of the Concurrent List: Placing education in the Concurrent List means both the Parliament and State Legislatures can make laws regarding schools and universities. However, if a state law directly conflicts with a central law on education, the central law prevails due to the doctrine of Union supremacy outlined in Article 254.
📌 Federalism • Seventh Schedule
Q.22) “Banking”, “Insurance”, and “Stock Exchanges” fall under which list in the Seventh Schedule?
Ans > Union List
- Principle of National Economic Uniformity: The Union List contains subjects of paramount national importance that demand absolute uniformity across the entire country. “Banking,” “Insurance,” and “Stock Exchanges” are placed in this list because a fragmented financial system with 28 different state-level banking laws would cripple interstate commerce and foreign investment.
- Central Regulatory Architecture: Because these are Union subjects, the Parliament has the exclusive power to establish national regulatory bodies. This constitutional foundation is what legally empowers the Central government to create the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDAI).
- Preemption of State Interference: State governments are constitutionally barred from taxing banking operations directly or regulating the operations of stock exchanges like the BSE or NSE. This prevents politically motivated state legislation from disrupting the macroeconomic stability and monetary policy of the Indian Republic.
📌 Elections • Election Commission
Q.23) Which body prepares the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) for the guidance of political parties and candidates during elections in India?
Ans > Election Commission of India (ECI)
- Origins and Evolution: The Model Code of Conduct (MCC) is a unique Indian political innovation. It was not dictated by the Parliament but organically originated in Kerala in 1960 during state elections. Seeing its effectiveness in maintaining decorum, the Election Commission of India (ECI) adopted and expanded it for nationwide use in subsequent decades.
- Non-Statutory Nature: The most critical aspect of the MCC is that it is fundamentally non-statutory. It is not backed by any specific law passed by Parliament. Instead, it is a consensus document—a set of moral and behavioral guidelines agreed upon by all major political parties to ensure a level playing field and prevent the misuse of official machinery.
- Enforcement Window: The MCC comes into immediate effect the moment the Election Commission formally announces the election schedule at a press conference, and it remains operational until the election results are fully declared. While the MCC itself isn’t law, the ECI enforces it stringently, sometimes using powers under Article 324 or invoking the Indian Penal Code for correlated offenses.
📌 Elections • Delimitation Commission
Q.24) The Delimitation Commission in India is appointed by the President. Who among the following is a mandatory ex-officio member of the Delimitation Commission?
Ans > The Chief Election Commissioner or an Election Commissioner nominated by the CEC
- Objective of Delimitation: Article 82 of the Constitution mandates the readjustment of electoral constituencies to ensure that the population-to-seat ratio remains as mathematically equal as possible across the nation. The Delimitation Commission is the powerful, independent body tasked with redrawing these boundaries without political bias.
- Strict Composition Rules: To maintain absolute neutrality, the Delimitation Commission Act dictates a strict three-member composition. It is chaired by a serving or retired Judge of the Supreme Court. The Chief Election Commissioner (or a nominated Election Commissioner) serves as the second ex-officio member, bringing logistical electoral expertise. The third member is the State Election Commissioner of the concerned state.
- Immunity from Judicial Review: The orders passed by the Delimitation Commission hold the absolute force of law. To prevent endless political litigation that could delay general elections indefinitely, the Constitution explicitly states that the final orders of the Delimitation Commission cannot be challenged or modified in any court of law, not even the Supreme Court.
📌 Elections • Political Parties
Q.25) A political party gets recognized as a “State Party” if it wins at least 1 seat in the Lok Sabha for every how many seats allotted to that State in the Lok Sabha?
Ans > 25 seats
- The Election Symbols Order (1968): The recognition of political parties at the national and state levels is not directly written in the Constitution. It is governed by the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order of 1968, issued by the Election Commission. This order lays down complex, objective mathematical criteria for party recognition based on electoral performance.
- The 1-in-25 Lok Sabha Rule: One of the several pathways for a regional party to gain “State Party” status is directly tied to Lok Sabha performance. If a party wins 1 Lok Sabha seat for every 25 seats allocated to that specific state (or any fraction thereof), it qualifies. For instance, in a state with 40 Lok Sabha seats, the party needs to win 2 seats (since 40/25 = 1.6, fraction rounds up requirement).
- Privileges of Recognition: Gaining State Party status is highly coveted. Recognized parties are granted the exclusive right to use a reserved election symbol (like a bicycle, umbrella, or conch) across the state, ensuring illiterate voters can easily identify them. They also receive subsidized electoral rolls, free broadcast time on state television/radio, and the ability to field “star campaigners.”
📌 Elections • Political Parties
Q.26) As an alternative criteria introduced in 2011, a political party can be recognized as a “State Party” even if it wins zero seats, provided it secures at least what percentage of the total valid votes polled in the state during a general election to the Lok Sabha or State Assembly?
Ans > 8%
- Correcting Electoral Distortions: The First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) electoral system used in India often leads to massive distortions between a party’s popular vote share and the actual number of legislative seats it wins. A regional party might secure massive public support but fail to win a single seat due to vote-splitting.
- The 2011 ECI Amendment: Recognizing this flaw, the Election Commission introduced a new, liberalized criterion in 2011. It allowed parties to achieve “State Party” status purely on their vote-gathering strength, entirely independent of seat victories. This was a major relief for emerging parties trying to break into entrenched bi-polar state politics.
- The 8% Threshold: Under this rule, a political party is recognized as a State Party if it manages to secure at least 8% of the total valid votes polled in the state during a general election to the Lok Sabha or the State Legislative Assembly. This ensures that parties with genuine, wide-spread public backing receive the institutional benefits of recognition.
📌 Judiciary • Supreme Court
Q.27) In the Supreme Court, the power to formulate rules for regulating the practice and procedure of the Court is granted by:
Ans > Article 145
- Ensuring Judicial Independence: While Parliament makes overarching laws, Article 145 protects the operational independence of the judiciary. It specifically empowers the Supreme Court to draft its own internal rules governing how cases are filed, how lawyers behave, the procedure for granting bail, and how court fees are structured.
- The Presidential Check: The Supreme Court’s rule-making power is not absolute. To maintain a delicate system of constitutional checks and balances, any procedural rule formulated by the Supreme Court under Article 145 must receive the formal approval of the President of India before it can be legally enforced.
- Constitution of Benches: One of the most critical powers derived from Article 145 is the authority to determine bench strength. It explicitly mandates that any case involving a substantial question of constitutional law (Constitutional Bench cases) must be heard by a minimum of five judges, ensuring complex legal interpretations are handled by a wider array of judicial minds.
📌 Union & States • Article 300
Q.28) Article 300 clarifies that the Government of India can sue or be sued in the name of the “Union of India”. Does a state have the same capacity to sue or be sued in its own name?
Ans > Yes, in the name of the “State of [Name]”
- The State as a Legal Entity: Article 300 grants a distinct legal personality to the government. Just like a private corporation or a living citizen, the central and state governments can enter into contracts, acquire property, and engage in legal disputes. Therefore, a state sues and is sued under the specific title “State of [Name]” (e.g., State of West Bengal).
- Historical Continuity: The wording of Article 300 is a direct continuation of colonial legal frameworks. It inherits the legal liabilities from the Government of India Act, 1935, which itself traced back to the legal status of the Secretary of State for India, and originally, the East India Company.
- Sovereign vs. Non-Sovereign Immunity: The ability to sue the State has limitations based on judicial interpretations of “sovereign functions.” Generally, citizens can sue the State for breach of contract or torts committed by government employees during non-sovereign duties (like driving a government truck). However, the State often claims immunity if the injury occurred during core sovereign acts (like military action or strict law enforcement).
📌 Fundamental Rights • Rule of Law
Q.29) The concept of “Rule of Law” is deeply embedded in Article 14. According to A.V. Dicey’s concept of the Rule of Law, which of the following is NOT an essential element?
Ans > Discretionary powers granted to the executive to maintain public order
- The British Origin of Article 14: Article 14 (Equality before the law) borrows heavily from British jurisprudence, specifically the “Rule of Law” theory popularized by the 19th-century constitutional scholar A.V. Dicey. This theory forms the philosophical basis for ensuring that law, rather than the whims of men, governs a nation.
- Rejection of Discretion: Dicey’s theory explicitly rejects arbitrary or wide discretionary powers. He argued that wherever the executive government possesses vast discretionary authority, there is a severe risk of arbitrariness and tyranny. Therefore, granting discretionary powers to maintain public order is entirely contrary to his strict interpretation of the Rule of Law.
- Modification in the Indian Context: While India adopted the “Absence of arbitrary power” and “Equality before the law” elements from Dicey, the Indian Supreme Court does not follow his third principle (“primacy of individual rights”). In India, the Constitution—not the individual—is the supreme source of rights, and reasonable discretionary powers are legally granted to authorities to manage complex modern administrative challenges.
📌 Judiciary • All India Services
Q.30) Which Constitutional Amendment paved the way for the creation of an “All India Judicial Service” by amending Article 312?
Ans > 42nd Amendment Act (1976)
- Expanding Article 312: Originally, Article 312 of the Constitution only provided a mechanism to create generic All-India Services (like the IAS, IPS, and later the IFoS) to serve both the Union and the States. During the Emergency, the 42nd Amendment Act specifically inserted language into this article to explicitly allow the creation of an All-India Judicial Service (AIJS).
- The Role of the Rajya Sabha: The creation of an AIJS cannot be initiated by the Lok Sabha or the Central Government alone. Because creating a central service infringes on the states’ administrative domain, Article 312 mandates that the Rajya Sabha (representing the states) must first pass a resolution supported by a two-thirds majority declaring that an AIJS is “necessary in the national interest.”
- Current Stalemate: Despite the constitutional provision existing since 1976, and various Law Commission reports advocating for it to standardize the recruitment of District Judges, the AIJS has not yet been established. Many states and High Courts fiercely oppose it, arguing that a centralized judicial exam would ignore local language requirements and erode state-level judicial autonomy.
📌 Quick Summary — Polity Set 175
- NHRC Term: Changed to 3 years or 70 years of age under the 2019 Amendment.
- SHRC Removal: Members are appointed by the Governor but removed only by the President.
- CIC Term: The 2019 RTI Amendment allows the Central Government to prescribe their tenure.
- CBI Control: Functions under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions.
- Lokpal Jurisdiction: Exempts the PM on matters of international relations, security, space, and atomic energy.
- Article 15(1): Prohibits discrimination by the State on grounds “only” of religion, race, caste, sex, or birth place.
- Article 15(4): Added by the 1st Amendment (1951) for the advancement of SCs, STs, and backward classes.
- Article 16(4B): 81st Amendment (2000) exempted backlog reserved vacancies from the 50% ceiling.
- Article 19 Restrictions: Speech can be restricted for state security, public order, and friendly foreign relations.
- Self-Incrimination: Article 20(3) guarantees the right to silence for accused persons.
- Article 45 DPSP: 86th Amendment shifted focus to Early Childhood Care and Education (0-6 years).
- Article 51A(j): The Fundamental Duty to strive towards excellence in all spheres.
- 44th Amendment: Enacted during the tenure of President Neelam Sanjiva Reddy in 1978.
- 105th Amendment: Restored the power of State governments to identify and list OBCs.
- 106th Amendment: Women’s reservation (33%) is tied to the next census and delimitation exercise.
- Article 231: Empowers Parliament to establish a common High Court for multiple States.
- Money Bills in States: A Governor cannot return a Money Bill for reconsideration to a unicameral legislature.
- Legislative Councils: Can delay an Ordinary Bill in the second instance for a maximum of 1 month.
- Article 323B Tribunals: Excludes inter-state river water disputes (which fall under Article 262).
- Seventh Schedule (State List): Contains “Public order” and “Police”.
- Seventh Schedule (Concurrent List): Contains “Education”, shifted by the 42nd Amendment.
- Seventh Schedule (Union List): “Banking”, “Insurance”, and “Stock Exchanges”.
- Model Code of Conduct: Prepared by the Election Commission; non-statutory by nature.
- Delimitation Commission: Mandatorily includes the Chief Election Commissioner or their nominee.
- State Party Criteria (Seats): Winning 1 Lok Sabha seat for every 25 allocated to the state.
- State Party Criteria (Votes): Securing at least 8% of total valid votes in a state general election.
- Article 145: Grants the Supreme Court power to frame its own rules of procedure, with Presidential approval.
- Article 300: States can sue and be sued directly in their own name (e.g., “State of [Name]”).
- Rule of Law (Article 14): A.V. Dicey’s concept rejects arbitrary/discretionary powers for the executive.
- All India Judicial Service: Made possible by amending Article 312 via the 42nd Amendment (1976).
Timer ⏳
30:00
Progress (0/30)
Click any card to flip and reveal the summarized answer!
Smart Review: Questions you got wrong appear here for focused study.