Polity Set 133
🔍
📌 Emergency Provisions • Article 352
Q.1) Once approved by both Houses of Parliament, a National Emergency (Article 352) continues for how long before requiring parliamentary renewal?
Ans > 6 months
- The Six-Month Accountability Loop: After the initial approval by both houses of Parliament—which must happen within one month of the initial proclamation—a National Emergency can only survive for a maximum of six months at a time. The Constitution mandates this to prevent the executive branch from holding emergency powers indefinitely without legislative oversight.
- Impact of the 44th Amendment: The original Constitution allowed a National Emergency to continue indefinitely once it received initial parliamentary approval. However, the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978 introduced the mandatory six-month renewal cycle to establish a vital democratic safeguard against the misuse of executive power.
- Renewal Majorities: Every single time the government wishes to extend the emergency beyond the six-month window, the extension must be passed by both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha using a special majority, making it exceedingly difficult to sustain without broad political consensus.
📌 Emergency Provisions • Parliament
Q.2) A resolution approving the proclamation of a National Emergency must be passed by either House of Parliament by a:
Ans > Special majority (majority of the total membership AND two-thirds of members present and voting)
- Defining the Special Majority: A special majority under Article 352 requires two simultaneous conditions to be met: first, more than 50% of the total total strength of the House must vote in favor, and second, at least two-thirds of the members who are physically present and voting must support the resolution.
- Prevention of Minoritarian Rule: The requirement for a special majority was specifically introduced to ensure that a ruling party with a slim, simple majority cannot easily suspend the fundamental rights of citizens and the federal structure of the country. It demands a significant bipartisan consensus.
- Historical Context of the Amendment: Similar to the six-month renewal rule, this stringent voting requirement was brought in by the Morarji Desai government through the 44th Amendment Act in 1978. Prior to this amendment, a National Emergency could be approved by a mere simple majority, which proved to be a constitutional vulnerability.
📌 Emergency Provisions • Revocation
Q.3) Under the 44th Amendment Act (1978), the President MUST revoke a National Emergency if the Lok Sabha passes a resolution disapproving its continuation by a:
Ans > Simple majority
- Lok Sabha’s Exclusive Power: The power to force the revocation of a National Emergency lies exclusively with the Lok Sabha (the lower house), not the Rajya Sabha. Because the Lok Sabha is directly elected by the people, it is given the ultimate authority to pull the plug on emergency powers if it feels they are no longer justified.
- The Simple Majority Threshold: While imposing or extending an emergency requires a tough special majority, revoking it is intentionally made much easier. A simple majority—meaning more than 50% of the members present and voting in the Lok Sabha—is all that is required to pass a resolution of disapproval.
- Mandatory Presidential Action: The language of the Constitution is binding here. If the Lok Sabha passes this disapproval resolution, the President “must” revoke the emergency. The President has no discretionary power or veto over this decision, firmly subordinating the executive to the will of the lower house.
📌 Emergency Provisions • Lok Sabha
Q.4) To move a resolution disapproving the continuation of a National Emergency, a written notice must be signed by at least what fraction of the total members of the Lok Sabha?
Ans > One-tenth
- The One-Tenth Requirement: To initiate the process of revoking an emergency, at least 10% of the total membership of the Lok Sabha (which currently equates to 55 members) must sign a written notice of their intention to move a disapproval resolution. This acts as a filter against frivolous motions while remaining accessible to the opposition.
- To Whom the Notice is Given: The routing of this written notice depends on whether the Parliament is currently in session. If the Lok Sabha is in session, the notice must be handed directly to the Speaker. If the House is not in session, the members must submit the notice directly to the President of India.
- The 14-Day Deadline: Once a valid notice is received by either the Speaker or the President, a special sitting of the Lok Sabha must be convened within exactly 14 days solely for the purpose of considering the resolution. This strict timeline ensures the executive cannot delay a floor test on the emergency.
📌 Emergency Provisions • Financial Emergency
Q.5) Which of the following emergencies does NOT require repeated parliamentary approval every six months for its continuation?
Ans > Financial Emergency (Article 360)
- Indefinite Duration: Unlike a National Emergency or President’s Rule, a Financial Emergency (Article 360) has no maximum time limit prescribed by the Constitution. Once it receives the initial approval from Parliament, it remains in operation indefinitely until the President issues a subsequent proclamation to explicitly revoke it.
- Initial Approval Parameters: A Financial Emergency must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within two months of its issuance. Interestingly, unlike the National Emergency, this approval only requires a simple majority in both houses, making it procedurally easier to enact.
- Historical Application: Despite severe economic crises in India’s history—most notably the balance of payments crisis in 1991 where foreign exchange reserves nearly ran out—a Financial Emergency under Article 360 has never been declared in India. It remains a theoretical power in the constitutional arsenal.
📌 Panchayati Raj • Local Govt
Q.6) What is the constitutionally mandated term for every Panchayat (unless dissolved sooner)?
Ans > 5 years
- The Five-Year Mandate: According to Article 243E of the Indian Constitution, every Panchayat at every level (village, intermediate, and district) shall continue for exactly five years from the date appointed for its first meeting. It cannot continue for longer than this duration under normal circumstances.
- The 73rd Amendment Foundation: This fixed five-year term was institutionalized by the landmark 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992. Prior to this amendment, state governments frequently suspended local bodies and delayed elections for years, heavily compromising the system of grassroots democratic governance.
- Calculation of the Term: A crucial nuance often tested in exams is that the five-year clock begins ticking from the date of the first meeting of the newly constituted Panchayat, not from the date the election results are declared or the date the previous Panchayat’s term ended.
📌 Panchayati Raj • Elections
Q.7) If a Panchayat is dissolved prematurely, elections to constitute the new Panchayat must be completed before the expiration of a period of:
Ans > 6 months
- The Six-Month Deadline: If a state government dissolves a Panchayat before its five-year term is complete, the Constitution mandates that fresh elections must be held and completed within six months from the date of its dissolution. This strict timeline prevents state executives from keeping local bodies dissolved indefinitely.
- Preventing Democratic Vacuums: The core philosophy behind this six-month rule is to ensure that citizens at the village level are not left without their locally elected representatives for prolonged periods. It forces the State Election Commission to act swiftly to restore local self-governance.
- An Important Exception: There is one major exception to this rule. If the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued is less than six months, it is not mandatory to hold elections for that brief remaining period; the state can simply wait for the regular election cycle.
📌 Panchayati Raj • Terms
Q.8) If a prematurely dissolved Panchayat is reconstituted, what is the term of the newly elected Panchayat?
Ans > Only the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued
- The “Remainder Term” Rule: When a Panchayat is dissolved early and fresh elections are held, the newly elected body does not get a fresh, full five-year term. Instead, it only serves for the leftover or “remainder” period of the originally dissolved Panchayat’s mandate.
- Maintaining Election Cycles: This constitutional design is highly intentional. It ensures that the general election cycle for all Panchayats across the entire state remains synchronized. If every reconstituted Panchayat got a fresh five-year term, elections would become staggered and chaotic across different districts over time.
- State Control Limitation: By limiting the new Panchayat to the remainder of the term, the Constitution removes the incentive for a state government to arbitrarily dissolve a local body just to reset its political clock or force a fresh five-year mandate under favorable political conditions.
📌 Panchayati Raj • Exemptions
Q.9) However, if the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued is less than a certain duration, it is NOT necessary to hold elections for that remainder period. What is this duration?
Ans > 6 months
- The Six-Month Exemption: If a Panchayat is dissolved, but its original five-year term was due to expire in less than six months anyway, the State Election Commission is not constitutionally required to hold a by-election. The local body can simply remain vacant until the regular general elections are held.
- Administrative and Financial Practicality: Conducting elections is a highly resource-intensive process involving massive financial expenditure, security deployment, and administrative machinery. Holding an election to constitute a Panchayat that would only exist for a few weeks or months is considered a waste of public resources.
- Regular Election Readiness: When a Panchayat enters the final six months of its term, the State Election Commission is already supposed to be in the advanced stages of preparing for the next general Panchayat elections. Forcing a mid-term poll during this preparatory phase would cause severe logistical disruption.
📌 Municipalities • 74th Amendment
Q.10) Under the 74th Amendment Act, what is the minimum population threshold for the constitution of Wards Committees within the territorial area of a Municipality?
Ans > 3 Lakhs
- Article 243S Mandate: The Constitution, under Article 243S, explicitly states that Wards Committees must be constituted in all municipalities that have a population of three lakhs (300,000) or more. This population is determined by the figures published in the most recent official census.
- Bridging the Representation Gap: In heavily populated urban centers, a single municipal councilor might represent tens of thousands of people, making direct access difficult. Wards Committees act as a localized bridge, decentralizing power further down from the municipal corporation level to the neighborhood level.
- Composition and Territory: A Wards Committee can consist of a single municipal ward or encompass two or more adjacent wards. The state legislature holds the authority to make laws regarding the exact composition, the territorial area of these committees, and the manner in which seats are filled.
📌 Parliament • Anti-Defection
Q.11) The Anti-Defection Law (10th Schedule) does not apply to the presiding officer of a House. The Speaker or Chairman is exempted from disqualification if they:
Ans > Both A and B
- The Exemption for Neutrality: The 10th Schedule provides a specific exemption for Presiding Officers (like the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha). This allows them to sever ties with their original political party to maintain absolute neutrality and impartiality while conducting the business of the House.
- Voluntary Resignation Protection: If a member is elected as the Speaker and subsequently resigns from their political party to uphold the dignity and non-partisan nature of the office, they will not be disqualified under the Anti-Defection Law for “voluntarily giving up membership.”
- Rejoining Protection: Furthermore, once their tenure as the Presiding Officer concludes, the law allows them to safely rejoin their original political party. This dual protection ensures that members are not penalized for prioritizing institutional neutrality over party affiliation during their tenure in the chair.
📌 Parliament • Tenth Schedule
Q.12) Who makes the rules for giving effect to the provisions of the Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law) in a legislative House?
Ans > The Presiding Officer of the respective House
- Rule-Making Authority: Paragraph 8 of the Tenth Schedule explicitly empowers the Chairman or the Speaker of a House to frame the specific rules for implementing the Anti-Defection Law within their respective domains. These rules detail the procedure for filing petitions, conducting hearings, and issuing disqualification orders.
- Parliamentary Approval Required: While the Presiding Officer drafts these rules, they do not take effect in a vacuum. The rules must be laid before the House for a total period of 30 days. The House has the power to approve, modify, or completely reject the rules drafted by the Speaker or Chairman.
- Quasi-Judicial Role: When deciding questions of disqualification based on these rules, the Presiding Officer acts as a quasi-judicial tribunal. Following the landmark Kihoto Hollohan (1992) Supreme Court judgment, it was established that the final decision of the Speaker is subject to judicial review, but only after a final decision has been rendered.
📌 Parliament • Question Hour
Q.13) In Parliament, a “Starred Question” requires an oral answer. What kind of answer does an “Unstarred Question” require?
Ans > A written answer
- The Nature of Unstarred Questions: An Unstarred Question is one that is not called for an oral answer on the floor of the House. Instead, the concerned Minister provides a formal written answer, which is subsequently printed and placed on the Table of the House for the official record.
- No Supplementary Inquiries: Because the answer to an Unstarred Question is provided in writing, members do not have the opportunity to ask follow-up or “supplementary” questions on the floor of the house. This makes it ideal for requesting detailed statistical data or long factual reports.
- Notice Period and Volume: Members must generally provide a 15-day notice to ask an Unstarred Question. Due to the lack of floor time required to answer them, the Lok Sabha allows a much higher maximum limit of 230 Unstarred Questions to be listed for a single day, compared to the strict limit placed on Starred Questions.
📌 Parliament • Question Hour
Q.14) A member of Parliament can give a “Short Notice Question” on a matter of urgent public importance by giving a notice of less than:
Ans > 10 days
- Bypassing the Standard Notice: Ordinarily, questions asked during Question Hour require a standard notice period of at least 10 to 15 days. A “Short Notice Question” bypasses this rule, allowing members to seek answers on pressing issues of urgent public importance with a notice of less than 10 clear days.
- Ministerial Discretion: Crucially, a Short Notice Question cannot be forced upon the government. It can only be admitted and answered if the concerned Minister agrees to accept the short notice. If the Minister declines, stating they need more time to gather facts, the question cannot be raised through this accelerated route.
- Oral Delivery and Follow-ups: Similar to Starred Questions, Short Notice Questions are answered orally on the floor of the House immediately after the regular Question Hour concludes. Because they are answered orally, members are permitted to ask supplementary questions to press the Minister further on the urgent issue.
📌 Parliament • Question Hour
Q.15) What color is traditionally used for printing a Starred Question in the Lok Sabha list of questions?
Ans > Green
- Visual Organization System: The Lok Sabha secretariat uses a traditional, color-coded paper system to help Members of Parliament, Ministers, and the Speaker quickly identify the nature of the questions listed for the day during the fast-paced Question Hour.
- The Color Green: Starred Questions—which are marked with an asterisk (*) and require the Minister to stand up and deliver an oral answer—are always printed on Green paper. This immediately alerts the Minister that they must be prepared for spontaneous supplementary questions from the floor.
- Other Designated Colors: To complete the system, Unstarred Questions (requiring only written answers without follow-ups) are printed on White paper. Short Notice Questions (urgent matters with less than 10 days notice) are printed on Light Pink paper, and questions directed at Private Members (non-ministers) are printed on Yellow paper.
📌 Parliament • Legislative Deadlock
Q.16) The provision for a ‘Joint Sitting’ under Article 108 applies to:
Ans > Financial Bills and Ordinary Bills
- Resolving Legislative Deadlocks: Article 108 empowers the President to summon a Joint Sitting of both Houses of Parliament if a deadlock occurs—such as one house rejecting a bill passed by the other, or more than six months passing without action by the receiving house.
- Exclusion of Money Bills: Joint Sittings cannot be convened for Money Bills. Under the Constitution, the Lok Sabha has absolute supremacy regarding Money Bills. If the Rajya Sabha rejects it or delays it for more than 14 days, the bill is deemed passed regardless, making a deadlock resolution mechanism unnecessary.
- Exclusion of Constitutional Amendments: Constitutional Amendment Bills (Article 368) are also strictly excluded. To alter the fundamental framework of the Constitution, both houses must pass the amendment independently. Allowing a joint sitting would let the numerically larger Lok Sabha overpower the Rajya Sabha, destroying the federal balance.
📌 Parliament • Lapsing of Bills
Q.17) If the Lok Sabha is dissolved before the President notifies a Joint Sitting, what happens to the pending bill?
Ans > The bill lapses and the Joint Sitting cannot take place
- The Doctrine of Lapsing: Article 107 outlines the rules regarding the lapsing of bills. The general constitutional principle is that a bill which is pending in the Lok Sabha, or a bill that has been passed by the Lok Sabha but is pending in the Rajya Sabha, lapses entirely upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
- Rationale Behind the Rule: The logic behind this rule is deeply democratic. A newly elected Lok Sabha represents the current, fresh mandate of the people. It should not be forced to inherit, debate, or vote on the legislative agenda set by a previous, dissolved Lok Sabha that no longer holds public confidence.
- Deadlock Erased: Because the bill itself ceases to exist upon the dissolution of the lower house, the legislative deadlock also effectively dies with it. Therefore, a Joint Sitting cannot be convened for a bill that legally no longer exists in the parliamentary system.
📌 Parliament • Joint Sitting
Q.18) However, if the President has notified his intention to summon a Joint Sitting before the Lok Sabha is dissolved, what happens to the bill?
Ans > The bill does NOT lapse, and the Joint Sitting takes place notwithstanding the dissolution
- The Article 108(5) Exception: The Constitution provides a very specific exception to the general rule of lapsing. According to Article 108(5), if the President of India has formally issued a notification declaring an intention to summon a Joint Sitting, the dissolution of the Lok Sabha immediately afterward does not kill the bill.
- Crystallization of the Process: The logic here is that the President’s formal notification acts as an executive anchor, crystallizing the deadlock-resolution process. Once the head of state invokes this mechanism, the bill is protected and kept alive specifically for the purpose of the Joint Sitting.
- Action by the New House: In such a unique scenario, the Joint Sitting will still be held as planned, but it will feature the newly constituted Lok Sabha (after the general elections) sitting alongside the permanent Rajya Sabha to vote on the protected legislation.
📌 Parliament • Historical Facts
Q.19) How many times has a Joint Sitting of Parliament been convened in India to resolve a legislative deadlock?
Ans > Three times
- A Rare Parliamentary Tool: Despite the frequent political clashes between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha over the decades, the Joint Sitting mechanism is exceedingly rare. It has only been successfully convened and utilized three times in the entire history of independent India.
- The Three Instances: The first occurred in 1961 to pass the Dowry Prohibition Bill (deadlock from 1960). The second was in 1978 for the Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill (deadlock from 1977) under the Morarji Desai government. The third and most recent was in 2002 to pass the controversial Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) under the Vajpayee government.
- Lok Sabha’s Mathematical Advantage: When a Joint Sitting is convened, the bill is passed by a simple majority of the total members of both houses present and voting. Because the Lok Sabha has more than double the membership of the Rajya Sabha, the will of the Lok Sabha almost always prevails during a Joint Sitting.
📌 Public Finance • Funds of India
Q.20) Which fund is placed at the disposal of the President of India to make advances for unforeseen expenditures pending authorization by Parliament?
Ans > Contingency Fund of India
- Article 267 Authorization: The Contingency Fund of India is established under Article 267 of the Constitution. It acts as an imprest account—a designated pool of emergency funds placed strictly at the disposal of the President of India to handle urgent, unforeseen state expenditures.
- Bypassing Immediate Approval: Usually, not a single rupee can be drawn from the Consolidated Fund without an Appropriation Act passed by Parliament. The Contingency Fund allows the government to meet immediate crises (like natural disasters) without waiting for Parliament to convene and pass a law.
- Operational Control and Recoupment: While held on behalf of the President, the fund is practically operated by the Finance Secretary. Whenever money is advanced from this fund, the government must subsequently present the expenditure to Parliament for approval. Once approved, an equivalent amount is transferred from the Consolidated Fund to replenish the Contingency Fund.
📌 Public Finance • Accounts
Q.21) Under the Constitution, the “Public Account of India” (Article 266) includes:
Ans > Provident fund deposits, judicial deposits, and savings bank deposits
- The Government as a Banker: Under Article 266(2), the Public Account of India captures all public money received by or on behalf of the Government of India that does not belong in the Consolidated Fund. In this account, the government essentially acts as a banker or trustee holding money that belongs to the public.
- Nature of the Deposits: This fund primarily consists of liabilities where the money has to be returned to the rightful owners. It includes postal savings, national small savings fund, provident fund deposits of government employees, judicial deposits, and remittance accounts.
- Executive Control: Because the money in the Public Account does not technically belong to the government to spend as revenue, payments from this account do not require legislative approval. The executive can disburse these funds automatically to pay back citizens (like releasing a retiring employee’s provident fund) without asking Parliament for an appropriation bill.
📌 Constitutional Bodies • Statutory
Q.22) Which Constitutional Amendment Act gave a constitutional mandate to the National Commission for Minorities?
Ans > None of the above
- Statutory vs. Constitutional Status: The National Commission for Minorities (NCM) does not find a mention in the text of the Indian Constitution, meaning no constitutional amendment created it. It is entirely a statutory body, created by an act of Parliament—specifically, the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992.
- Recognized Communities: Under this Act, the Central Government has the power to notify minority communities. Currently, six religious communities are officially recognized as minorities on a national level: Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Parsis (Zoroastrians), and Jains (added most recently in 2014).
- Contrast with Other Commissions: This often creates confusion in exams because similar bodies are constitutional. For example, the National Commission for SCs (Article 338), STs (Article 338A, via the 89th Amendment), and Backward Classes (Article 338B, via the 102nd Amendment) possess constitutional status, whereas the Minorities Commission does not.
📌 Election Commission • Jurisdiction
Q.23) Under Article 324, the Election Commission has the power to superintend elections to all the following EXCEPT:
Ans > The State Municipalities and Panchayats
- The Federal Election Divide: The Constitution creates a strict jurisdictional divide when it comes to conducting elections. The Election Commission of India (ECI), established under Article 324, is exclusively responsible for conducting national and state-level elections (Parliament, State Legislatures, President, and Vice-President).
- The Role of State Election Commissions: Elections for local self-government bodies—namely Panchayats and Municipalities—fall completely outside the purview of the ECI. These local elections are conducted by independent State Election Commissions, which were established under Articles 243K and 243ZA by the 73rd and 74th Amendments.
- Independence of State Bodies: Although the State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor, their independence is rigorously protected. They have the exact same security of tenure as a High Court judge and operate entirely independently of both the state executive and the national Election Commission of India.
📌 Constitutional Bodies • UPSC
Q.24) The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) is a constitutional body. Can the Parliament extend its functions?
Ans > Yes, the Parliament can confer additional functions relating to the services of the Union on the UPSC
- Article 321 Provisions: The Constitution specifically anticipates that the administrative needs of the nation may evolve. Under Article 321, Parliament is empowered to enact legislation to extend the functions of the Union Public Service Commission beyond its core duties of conducting exams and advising on disciplinary matters.
- Scope of Expansion: Parliament can confer additional functions on the UPSC regarding the services of the Union government, local authorities, any public institution, or any corporate body established by law. This ensures the UPSC can act as the premier recruiting agency for a wide array of public bodies.
- Protection of Independence: While Parliament can increase the workload and jurisdiction of the UPSC, it cannot alter the constitutional safeguards that protect the Commission’s independence. The expenses of the UPSC remain charged on the Consolidated Fund, and its members’ removal processes cannot be easily modified.
📌 Constitutional Bodies • SPSC
Q.25) A member of the State Public Service Commission (SPSC) may be suspended from office during a pending Supreme Court inquiry by the:
Ans > Governor of the State
- The Removal Anomaly: The State Public Service Commission (SPSC) features a unique constitutional anomaly designed to protect its members from state-level political pressure. While the Governor of the state appoints the Chairman and members of the SPSC, the Governor has absolutely no power to remove them. Only the President of India can remove an SPSC member.
- The Power of Suspension: However, if a member is facing allegations of misbehavior, the matter must be referred to the Supreme Court for a formal inquiry. While this high-level judicial inquiry is pending, Article 317(2) grants the Governor the power to suspend the member from office until the President passes final orders based on the Court’s report.
- Ensuring State Autonomy and Fairness: This division of power ensures that a vindictive state government cannot easily fire a strict SPSC chairman, as removal requires the President and the Supreme Court. Yet, it allows the state’s Governor to immediately suspend an actively corrupt official while the lengthy investigation takes place.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Armed Forces
Q.26) Which Article empowers the Parliament to restrict or abrogate the Fundamental Rights of the members of the armed forces to ensure proper discharge of their duties and maintenance of discipline?
Ans > Article 33
- The Military Exception: Article 33 acts as a specific carve-out from the Fundamental Rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution. It acknowledges that military and police organizations require a distinct code of discipline that is fundamentally incompatible with unrestricted civilian liberties, such as the right to form unions or the freedom of speech.
- Exclusive Parliamentary Power: The power to restrict these rights is vested exclusively in the Parliament of India; State Legislatures have zero authority to make laws under Article 33, even if the law concerns a state police force. This ensures complete uniformity in disciplinary laws across all armed and police forces in the country.
- Broad Scope of Application: The terminology under Article 33 is highly expansive. It applies not just to combat soldiers in the Army, Navy, and Air Force, but also to paramilitary forces, state police forces, members of intelligence agencies (like IB and RAW), and even non-combatants like cooks, barbers, and mechanics employed by the armed forces.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Judicial Review
Q.27) Laws enacted by Parliament under Article 33 can be challenged in any court on the ground of contravention of any of the Fundamental Rights. True or False?
Ans > False, they cannot be challenged in any court on the ground of contravention of any of the Fundamental Rights.
- Immunity from Judicial Review: When Parliament uses its Article 33 powers to enact disciplinary laws (such as the Army Act, 1950, or the Police Forces Restriction of Rights Act, 1966), these specific laws are granted constitutional immunity. They cannot be struck down or challenged in the Supreme Court or High Courts on the premise that they violate Fundamental Rights.
- Court Martial Exclusivity: The Constitution ensures that military tribunals and court-martials can operate without constant interference from civilian courts. An active-duty soldier punished for speaking out against a commanding officer cannot file a writ petition claiming a violation of their Article 19 freedom of speech.
- Balancing Security and Liberty: While the Supreme Court has declared judicial review to be part of the “basic structure” of the Constitution, Article 33 represents an original constitutional mandate where the framers deliberately prioritized national security, chain of command, and institutional discipline over individual fundamental liberties.
📌 Fundamental Rights • Enforcement
Q.28) Who is empowered to make laws to give effect to certain specified Fundamental Rights (such as prescribing punishment for untouchability or human trafficking)?
Ans > Parliament only
- Ensuring National Uniformity: Article 35 dictates that the power to make laws penalizing offenses declared under Part III of the Constitution (Fundamental Rights) belongs entirely and exclusively to the Parliament. State legislatures are barred from making these laws to ensure that punishments for constitutional crimes are completely uniform across the entire territory of India.
- Application to Specific Articles: This parliamentary power is primarily utilized to enforce Article 17 (which abolishes untouchability) and Article 23 (which prohibits human trafficking and forced labor). Parliament used this power to enact the Untouchability (Offences) Act, 1955 (later renamed the Protection of Civil Rights Act).
- Prescribing Residence Requirements: Article 35 also gives Parliament the exclusive right to make laws prescribing residence as a condition for certain state government employments under Article 16(3). Again, denying this power to states prevents local governments from creating fragmented, hyper-regionalized employment laws that would hurt national integration.
📌 Scheduled Areas • Administration
Q.29) The Fifth Schedule provisions apply to the administration of Scheduled Areas in various states. Which Ministry is the nodal ministry for matters related to the Fifth Schedule?
Ans > Ministry of Tribal Affairs
- Jurisdiction of the Ministry: The Ministry of Tribal Affairs, created in 1999 to give focused attention to the integrated socio-economic development of Scheduled Tribes, is the nodal central ministry overseeing the implementation of the Fifth Schedule. This schedule applies to designated “Scheduled Areas” in ten states across central and peninsular India.
- Role of the Tribes Advisory Council: Under the Fifth Schedule, states with Scheduled Areas must establish a Tribes Advisory Council (TAC) consisting of up to 20 members, three-fourths of whom must be tribal MLAs. The Ministry of Tribal Affairs monitors the functioning of these councils and reviews the mandatory annual reports submitted by Governors regarding the administration of these areas.
- The Sixth Schedule Distinction: It is crucial for competitive exam preparation to note the administrative split. While the Fifth Schedule belongs to Tribal Affairs, the Sixth Schedule (which deals with highly autonomous tribal regions in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram) falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Home Affairs due to its sensitive border locations and internal security implications.
📌 Scheduled Areas • Sixth Schedule
Q.30) Under the Sixth Schedule, if there is a conflict between a law made by the District Council and a law made by the State Legislature, whose law prevails?
Ans > The State Legislature’s law prevails, and the District Council’s law is void to the extent of repugnancy.
- The Doctrine of Repugnancy: In the Sixth Schedule states of Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram, the Autonomous District Councils hold significant legislative powers. However, they are not sovereign entities. If a council makes a law on a subject that directly conflicts with a law passed by the State Legislature, the state law universally prevails, rendering the council’s law legally void to the extent of the contradiction.
- The Assam Exception: The Constitution provides a unique operational nuance for the state of Assam. In Assam, acts of the state legislature regarding subjects entrusted to the District Councils do not automatically apply to the autonomous districts. They only apply if the District Council explicitly issues a public notification directing their application.
- Governor’s Oversight: Even when District Councils pass laws within their rightful constitutional jurisdiction (such as laws regarding land, forests, or shifting cultivation), these laws do not take effect immediately. They possess no legal validity until they are presented to the Governor of the state and receive their formal assent.
📌 Quick Summary — Polity Set 133
- Emergency Renewal: National Emergency requires parliamentary renewal every 6 months.
- Emergency Approval: Requires a special majority (majority total + 2/3 present & voting).
- Emergency Revocation: Lok Sabha can force revocation with a simple majority.
- Disapproval Notice: Needs signatures of at least 1/10th of Lok Sabha members.
- Financial Emergency: Does NOT require repeated 6-month approvals (continues indefinitely).
- Panchayat Term: Fixed at exactly 5 years from its first meeting.
- Premature Dissolution: Fresh Panchayat elections must be held within 6 months.
- Reconstituted Panchayat: Only serves the remainder of the dissolved Panchayat’s term.
- Election Exemption: No election needed if the remainder term is less than 6 months.
- Wards Committees: Constitutionally mandated for Municipalities with a population of 3 Lakhs or more.
- Anti-Defection Exemption: Presiding officers can voluntarily leave and rejoin their party without disqualification.
- Tenth Schedule Rules: Framed by the Presiding Officer of the respective House.
- Unstarred Questions: Require a formal written answer (no supplementary questions).
- Short Notice Questions: Can be asked with less than 10 days notice for urgent matters.
- Starred Questions: Printed on green paper to indicate an oral answer is required.
- Joint Sitting Scope: Applies only to Ordinary and Financial Bills (not Money or Const. Amendments).
- Lapsing of Bills: If LS dissolves before JS notification, the pending bill lapses.
- Protected Bills: If JS notification is issued before LS dissolution, the bill does NOT lapse.
- Joint Sittings Convened: Has occurred exactly three times in independent India.
- Contingency Fund: Placed at the President’s disposal for unforeseen expenditures.
- Public Account: Holds provident fund, judicial, and savings bank deposits.
- Minorities Commission: Is a statutory body, not created by any Constitutional Amendment.
- Election Commission: Does NOT superintend Panchayat or Municipal elections.
- UPSC Functions: Parliament can constitutionally extend the functions of the UPSC.
- SPSC Suspension: Members are suspended by the State Governor during a Supreme Court inquiry.
- Armed Forces Rights: Article 33 empowers Parliament to restrict their Fundamental Rights.
- Judicial Review Exemption: Article 33 laws cannot be challenged on grounds of violating Fundamental Rights.
- Enforcing Rights: Article 35 grants Parliament the exclusive power to prescribe punishments for FR violations.
- Fifth Schedule Nodal: Administered and monitored by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs.
- Sixth Schedule Repugnancy: State Legislature laws override conflicting District Council laws.
Timer ⏳
20:00
Progress (0/30)
Click any card to flip and reveal the summarized answer!
Smart Review: Questions you got wrong appear here for focused study.