Modern History Set 82
🔍
📌 Labor Movement • Modern History
Q.1) To provide a national platform for the burgeoning labor movement, the All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) was founded in 1920. Who was elected as its first President?
Ans > C) Lala Lajpat Rai
- Foundation and ILO Context: The All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) was founded on October 31, 1920, in Bombay. It emerged as the first national trade union organization in India, primarily driven by the need to secure representation for Indian labor at the newly formed International Labour Organization (ILO) in Geneva.
- Leadership of Lala Lajpat Rai: Lala Lajpat Rai, a prominent nationalist and member of the legendary Lal-Bal-Pal trio, was elected as its first President, while Diwan Chaman Lall became its first General Secretary. In his presidential address, Lajpat Rai famously linked imperialism with capitalism, arguing that both were twin systems of exploitation.
- Integrating Labor with Nationalism: The formation of AITUC marked a critical juncture in Modern Indian History as it successfully integrated the burgeoning working-class movement with the mainstream Indian National Movement. By aligning labor rights with the broader demand for Swaraj (self-rule), AITUC ensured that the economic grievances of mill workers, railway employees, and miners were amplified on a national political platform, significantly strengthening the anti-colonial struggle.
📌 British Commissions • Modern History
Q.2) In 1929, the British Government appointed a Royal Commission on Labour to inquire into the working conditions in Indian industries and plantations. By what name is this commission commonly known?
Ans > B) The Whitley Commission
- Appointment and Scope: The Royal Commission on Labour was appointed in 1929 under the chairmanship of John Henry Whitley. Its primary mandate was to investigate the working conditions of laborers across factories, plantations, and mines, which were notoriously unregulated and highly exploitative at the time.
- Report Findings: The commission submitted its comprehensive report in 1931, heavily highlighting the immense poverty, poor health, widespread indebtedness, and gruelingly exploitative working hours endured by Indian laborers, particularly women and children in the unorganized sectors.
- Impact on Legislation: It recommended the adoption of progressive labor welfare measures, including the improvement of industrial relations, the establishment of works committees, and better maternity benefits. The commission’s findings laid the critical groundwork for several subsequent labor laws in India, notably influencing major amendments to the Factories Act and shaping the Payment of Wages Act, fundamentally shifting the British government’s approach from mere regulation to rudimentary labor welfare.
📌 Acts & Policies • Modern History
Q.3) The Trade Disputes Act of 1929 imposed severe restrictions on the working-class movement in India. Which of the following did the Act explicitly make illegal?
Ans > B) Sympathetic strikes and strikes intended to coerce the government
- Curbing Union Militancy: Enacted by the British colonial government primarily to curb the rising tide of militant trade unionism and growing communist influence within the Indian labor movement, the Trade Disputes Act of 1929 was a highly repressive piece of legislation.
- Banning Sympathetic Strikes: The Act made sympathetic strikes (where workers from one industry strike in solidarity with workers of another industry) and strikes explicitly designed to coerce the government completely illegal, effectively stripping workers of their most potent collective bargaining tool.
- Restrictions on Public Utilities: It mandated a compulsory one-month prior notice before any strike or lockout could be declared in essential public utility services, such as railways, postal services, and water supply, severely crippling the spontaneous striking capability of the workforce.
- Dispute Resolution Bodies: Furthermore, it authorized the government to unilaterally appoint Courts of Inquiry and Boards of Conciliation to settle industrial disputes, though its main objective remained heavily repressive, aiming to break the back of organized labor protests and isolate radical leaders.
📌 Civil Services • Modern History
Q.4) The Indian Civil Service (ICS) examination was notoriously difficult for Indians to clear due to strict age limits and its location in London. In 1863, who became the first Indian to successfully pass this exam?
Ans > C) Satyendranath Tagore
- The Elite Steel Frame: The Indian Civil Service (ICS) was the elite higher civil service of the British Empire in India, often referred to by politicians as the “steel frame” of British administrative rule, and was deliberately kept out of reach for native Indians.
- Shattering the Racial Barrier: Satyendranath Tagore, an highly accomplished scholar, author, and the elder brother of Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore, shattered a significant racial barrier by becoming the very first Indian to pass the prestigious ICS examination in 1863.
- Discriminatory Exam Conditions: The examination was notoriously discriminatory against Indians. It was held exclusively in London, required expensive travel, featured a heavily biased syllabus focusing on European classics (Greek and Latin), and possessed an incredibly low maximum age limit (sometimes restricted to 19 or 21 years of age).
- Legacy and Inspiration: Tagore was allotted the Bombay Presidency cadre, where he served for over three decades as a judge. His success inspired a new generation of educated Indians to continuously demand the simultaneous holding of ICS exams in India and a greater Indianization of the colonial administration.
📌 Women in Politics • Modern History
Q.5) In 1890, a historic moment occurred for women’s political participation when the first female graduate of Calcutta University addressed the Indian National Congress session. Who was she?
Ans > B) Kadambini Ganguly
- First Female Speaker at INC: Kadambini Ganguly made monumental history in 1890 when she became the first female speaker to formally address the Indian National Congress (INC) during its Calcutta session, breaking significant political and social barriers.
- Academic Trailblazer: She was already a renowned trailblazer, having become one of the first two female graduates of the entire British Empire (alongside Chandramukhi Basu) when she earned her Bachelor of Arts degree from Calcutta University in 1883.
- Medical Pioneer: Furthermore, Kadambini was one of the earliest female physicians in South Asia to be formally trained in Western medicine, successfully breaking into a heavily male-dominated profession despite facing massive conservative societal backlash.
- Symbol of Women’s Empowerment: Her prominent presence and articulate speech at the INC session marked a monumental shift in the national movement. It symbolized the formal entry of educated Indian women into mainstream politics and laid the early foundational stones for the subsequent women’s rights movement and the fight for female suffrage in colonial India.
📌 INC Early Phase • Modern History
Q.6) The inaugural session of the Indian National Congress was held at Gokuldas Tejpal Sanskrit College in Bombay in 1885. How many delegates attended this first session?
Ans > B) 72
- The Inaugural Gathering: The historic inaugural session of the Indian National Congress was held from December 28 to 30, 1885, at the Gokuldas Tejpal Sanskrit College in Bombay. It was initially planned to be held in Poona, but was abruptly shifted to Bombay due to a sudden cholera outbreak.
- Delegate Composition: The session was attended by exactly 72 delegates from across the country, comprising prominent lawyers, progressive journalists, and liberal educators. This gathering primarily represented the educated, English-speaking middle-class intelligentsia of India.
- Key Founders and President: Womesh Chandra Bonnerjee (W.C. Bonnerjee), an eminent and highly respected Bengali lawyer, had the historic distinction of presiding over this very first session, while Allan Octavian Hume, a retired British civil servant, played a crucial background role in organizing and facilitating the assembly.
- Early Moderate Demands: The session passed nine core resolutions, primarily demanding the expansion and reform of legislative councils, the holding of simultaneous ICS examinations in both India and England, and a significant reduction in British military expenditure, setting the polite, petition-based moderate tone for the Congress’s early phase.
📌 British Viceroys • Modern History
Q.7) Which British Viceroy initially viewed the Indian National Congress with favor but later turned hostile, famously dismissing it as a body representing only a “microscopic minority” of India?
Ans > C) Lord Dufferin
- Viceroy During INC Formation: Lord Dufferin served as the Viceroy of India from 1884 to 1888, which perfectly coincided with the highly critical period during which the Indian National Congress was formally founded in 1885.
- Initial Neutral Patronage: Initially, Dufferin maintained a neutral, somewhat patronizing stance toward the Congress. He even famously hosted a lavish garden party for the delegates attending the second INC session held in Calcutta in 1886.
- Turning Hostile: However, as the Congress rapidly evolved, began articulating bolder political demands, and started publishing severe critiques of British economic exploitation, Dufferin’s attitude rapidly soured, leading him to actively and publicly oppose the organization.
- The “Microscopic Minority” Remark: In a highly publicized speech delivered in 1888, he openly mocked the Congress, asserting that it represented merely a “microscopic minority” of the massive Indian population. He argued that the educated elite had no legitimate claim to speak for the diverse, uneducated rural masses, signaling the absolute beginning of formal British hostility towards the nationalist body.
📌 Partition & Swadeshi • Modern History
Q.8) The controversial Partition of Bengal, designed by Lord Curzon to divide the nationalist ranks, formally came into effect on which date?
Ans > B) October 16, 1905
- The Administrative Pretext: Lord Curzon officially announced the Partition of Bengal under the deceptive administrative pretext that the massive province (which at the time included Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa) was simply too large and populous to govern efficiently from a single center.
- The True Political Motive: However, the real, unspoken political motive was to deliberately divide the politically advanced and highly vocal Bengali intelligentsia. Curzon aimed to shatter growing nationalist solidarity by artificially creating a Muslim-majority East Bengal and a Hindu-majority West Bengal.
- A Day of National Mourning: The partition formally and legally came into effect on October 16, 1905. This specific date was observed across the entirety of Bengal as a profound day of national mourning, massive fasting, and widespread hartals (strikes).
- Symbols of Unity: On this day, people walked barefoot to the Ganges for a holy dip, and Rabindranath Tagore popularized the tying of Rakhis between Hindus and Muslims as a powerful, highly visible symbol of unbreakable fraternal unity against British divide-and-rule tactics.
📌 Partition & Swadeshi • Modern History
Q.9) In protest against the impending Partition of Bengal, the Swadeshi Movement was formally proclaimed at a massive public meeting at the Calcutta Town Hall on which date?
Ans > A) August 7, 1905
- Formal Proclamation: The Swadeshi Movement was officially and formally launched on August 7, 1905, during a massively attended public gathering at the Calcutta Town Hall. This was a direct, pre-emptive political response to the impending, highly controversial Partition of Bengal.
- Boycott and Indigenous Promotion: The core strategic framework of the movement was twofold: the aggressive, uncompromising boycott of British manufactured goods (especially cheap Manchester cloth and Liverpool salt) and the vigorous promotion of ‘Swadeshi’ or indigenous Indian industries and localized products.
- Mass Political Agitation: The movement rapidly escalated into massive public bonfires of foreign clothes at busy crossroads, intense picketing of shops selling foreign goods, and a significant surge in the establishment of indigenous textile mills, soap factories, and national banking institutions.
- A Nationalist Watershed: This movement served as an absolute watershed moment in Indian history as it successfully transitioned the nationalist struggle from polite ‘petition politics’ to active, mass-based political agitation, drawing immense, unprecedented participation from students, women, and the urban middle classes.
📌 Extremists vs Moderates • Modern History
Q.10) The growing ideological rift between the Moderates and the Extremists within the Indian National Congress culminated in the historic ‘Surat Split’ in which year?
Ans > C) 1907
- Culmination of Ideological Battles: The disastrous Surat Split of 1907 was the tragic culmination of a prolonged, bitter ideological and tactical battle between the Moderates (led by figures like Gokhale and Pherozeshah Mehta) and the Extremists (led by the fiery trio of Tilak, Lajpat Rai, and Bipin Chandra Pal).
- Tactical Disagreements: The Extremists fiercely wanted to expand the Swadeshi and Boycott movements beyond the borders of Bengal to the rest of India and directly demand full Swaraj. Conversely, the Moderates wished to confine the movement strictly to Bengal and adhere solely to legal, constitutional methods of protest.
- Physical Altercations at Surat: Tensions totally boiled over at the 1907 Congress session held on the banks of the Tapti River in Surat. The session descended into chaos, leading to physical altercations, hurled chairs, and the formal, highly publicized expulsion of the Extremist leaders from the party.
- Weakening the Movement: This catastrophic split severely weakened the Indian nationalist movement for nearly a decade. It allowed the British government to easily and systematically suppress the Extremists with harsh, draconian sedition laws while simultaneously pacifying the Moderates with minor constitutional concessions.
📌 Constitutional Reforms • Modern History
Q.11) The Indian Councils Act of 1909, which introduced separate electorates for Muslims and sowed the seeds of communalism, is more popularly known by what name?
Ans > B) Morley-Minto Reforms
- The Morley-Minto Identity: The Indian Councils Act of 1909 is almost universally known as the Morley-Minto Reforms, named directly after the Secretary of State for India, John Morley, and the Viceroy of India, Lord Minto, who jointly engineered the legislation.
- Institutionalizing Communalism: Its most damaging and permanent historical legacy was the formal introduction of the system of “separate electorates” specifically for Muslims. Under this system, Muslim voters could exclusively vote only for Muslim candidates, legally and structurally institutionalizing communal divides in Indian politics.
- Sowing “Dragon’s Teeth”: Lord Minto famously and chillingly described this political move as sowing “dragon’s teeth.” It was a highly calculated imperial strategy explicitly designed to prevent the emergence of a unified nationalist challenge by keeping Hindu and Muslim political aspirations permanently fractured.
- Illusion of Power: While the Act moderately increased the total number of elected Indian members in the Imperial and Provincial Legislative Councils, it granted them zero real legislative or executive power, acting merely as advisory bodies and deeply frustrating Indian demands for genuine self-government.
📌 Pacts & Treaties • Modern History
Q.12) The historic Lucknow Pact of 1916 brought the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League together on a common political platform. Which two leaders were the chief architects of this pact?
Ans > B) Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Muhammad Ali Jinnah
- Historic Political Agreement: The Lucknow Pact was a profoundly historic political agreement reached between the Indian National Congress and the All-India Muslim League during their simultaneously held joint sessions in Lucknow in December 1916.
- The Chief Architects: Bal Gangadhar Tilak (who had recently returned from his long, grueling imprisonment in Mandalay) and a highly secular, young Muhammad Ali Jinnah were the primary political architects who successfully bridged the massive gap between the two major organizations.
- The Compromise on Electorates: In a highly significant and controversial compromise, the Congress formally accepted the Muslim League’s strict demand for separate electorates. While heavily criticized by later historians as appeasement, it was viewed at the time as absolutely necessary to forge a united, powerful anti-imperialist front.
- Reunification of Congress: Beyond Hindu-Muslim unity, the pact established a joint demand for immediate self-government (Dominion Status) and significantly marked the triumphant, formal re-entry of the Extremist faction back into the Indian National Congress after nearly a decade of political isolation.
📌 Home Rule Movement • Modern History
Q.13) In 1916, two separate Home Rule Leagues were established in India. While Annie Besant operated across most of India, Bal Gangadhar Tilak restricted his League’s operations to Maharashtra, Karnataka, Central Provinces, and Berar. Where was Tilak’s League headquartered?
Ans > B) Pune
- Formation and Geography: Bal Gangadhar Tilak formally established the Indian Home Rule League in April 1916 at the Belgaum provincial conference. To strictly avoid administrative clashes with Annie Besant, Tilak strategically confined his league’s geographical operations to Maharashtra (specifically excluding the city of Bombay), Karnataka, the Central Provinces, and Berar.
- Headquarters in Pune: Tilak established the core operational headquarters of his highly organized league in Pune (Poona), which served as the nerve center for coordinating political agitation across his designated territories.
- Grassroots Mobilization: Tilak’s league operated through six well-organized branches and was highly instrumental in aggressively popularizing the demand for Swaraj (self-rule) at the deep grassroots village level by heavily utilizing regional, vernacular languages rather than just English.
- The Immortal Slogan: He closely linked the militant demand for Home Rule with the formation of linguistic states and the promotion of vernacular education, uttering his immortal, electrifying slogan during this campaign: “Swaraj is my birthright, and I shall have it,” which dramatically revitalized the dormant Indian political landscape.
📌 Home Rule Movement • Modern History
Q.14) Annie Besant formally inaugurated her Home Rule League in September 1916. Where was the headquarters of her League located?
Ans > A) Adyar, Madras
- Launch and Leadership: Annie Besant, a fiery Irish socialist, renowned orator, and prominent leader of the Theosophical Society, officially launched the All India Home Rule League slightly after Tilak, in September 1916.
- The Theosophical Base: She established the primary headquarters of her sprawling league in Adyar, Madras (now Chennai). This location was highly strategic, as it was also the global headquarters of the Theosophical Society, allowing her to rapidly leverage its extensive, existing network of lodges to mobilize nationwide support.
- A Broader Geographical Scope: Unlike Tilak’s league, which was strictly geographically restricted to specific provinces, Besant’s Home Rule League was authorized to operate freely across the entirety of the rest of India, including the highly influential Bombay Presidency, eventually boasting over 200 local branches.
- Media and Moderate Influence: Through her powerful, widely read newspapers, ‘New India’ and ‘Commonweal’, she fiercely advocated for self-government on the lines of the white dominions. Her movement successfully drew many prominent, previously moderate leaders—including Motilal Nehru, Tej Bahadur Sapru, and C.R. Das—into direct, militant agitation.
📌 Constitutional Reforms • Modern History
Q.15) The British government shifted its stance and promised the “gradual development of self-governing institutions” in India through a historic declaration made in August of which year?
Ans > B) 1917
- The Montagu Declaration: The August Declaration, also widely known as the Montagu Declaration, was a highly significant landmark statement delivered by Edwin Montagu, the Secretary of State for India, on August 20, 1917, in the British House of Commons.
- A Definitive Policy Shift: This declaration marked a definitive, historic shift in British colonial policy. For the first time, it explicitly promised the “increasing association of Indians in every branch of the administration” and the “gradual development of self-governing institutions.”
- Acknowledging Responsible Government: Crucially, the British Empire officially acknowledged that the ultimate, long-term political goal for India was the realization of “responsible government” within the framework of the British Empire, essentially validating the core demands of the raging Home Rule movement.
- Mixed Nationalist Reactions: While the declaration successfully pacified the older Moderate leaders of the Congress (who viewed it as a Magna Carta), the Extremists severely criticized its highly vague timeline. The British hypocritically retained the absolute right to determine the pace, nature, and timing of these promised constitutional reforms.
📌 Gandhian Era • Modern History
Q.16) Mahatma Gandhi’s very first experiment with Satyagraha on Indian soil involved protesting the exploitative Tinkathia system. Where did this take place in 1917?
Ans > C) Champaran
- The First Satyagraha: The Champaran Satyagraha of 1917 in the state of Bihar holds massive historical significance as Mahatma Gandhi’s very first successful experiment with his unique weapon of Satyagraha (truth-force or civil disobedience) on Indian soil.
- The Oppressive Tinkathia System: Wealthy European planters were brutally exploiting local peasants through the draconian ‘Tinkathia’ system. This system legally and forcibly compelled farmers to cultivate indigo (a cash crop) on exactly 3/20th of their total landholdings under highly unfavorable, permanently fixed financial terms.
- Gandhi’s Investigation: Persuaded by an incredibly persistent local peasant named Rajkumar Shukla, Gandhi arrived in Champaran. He openly defied a direct, written British police order to immediately leave the district, choosing instead to conduct an exhaustive, village-by-village factual inquiry into the farmers’ deep grievances.
- A Victory for the Peasantry: His highly methodical, strictly non-violent resistance forced the British government to appoint the formal Champaran Agrarian Committee (with Gandhi included as a prominent member). The committee ultimately abolished the oppressive Tinkathia system and refunded a significant portion of the illegally extracted money to the impoverished farmers.
📌 Gandhian Era • Modern History
Q.17) In 1918, Gandhi advised peasants whose crops had failed to withhold land revenue payments from the British government. In which district did this Satyagraha take place?
Ans > C) Kheda
- First Non-Cooperation Experiment: The Kheda Satyagraha of 1918 in Gujarat was Mahatma Gandhi’s very first major, practical application of the ‘Non-Cooperation’ strategy concerning purely economic and agrarian peasant grievances.
- The Agrarian Crisis: The district of Kheda had suffered a severe, crippling agrarian crisis due to widespread, devastating crop failures and a deadly plague epidemic. Despite this ruin, the British revenue officials rigidly and cruelly refused to grant the legally mandated remission of land revenue.
- Withholding Taxes: Under the spiritual guidance of Gandhi and the highly dynamic, ground-level administrative leadership of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the impoverished peasants took a solemn, unbreakable pledge to entirely withhold the payment of all colonial taxes, actively braving the brutal confiscation of their lands and cattle by ruthless British agents.
- A Psychological Victory: The government, severely pressurized by this unified, unshakable, non-violent resistance, eventually backed down. They issued secret instructions to their collectors to recover revenue only from those who could comfortably afford it, marking a massive psychological and moral victory for the Indian peasantry.
📌 Gandhian Era • Modern History
Q.18) During the Ahmedabad Mill Strike of 1918, Mahatma Gandhi used which specific method of protest for the very first time in India?
Ans > C) Hunger strike to death (fasting)
- An Industrial Dispute: The Ahmedabad Mill Strike of 1918 was a highly critical intervention by Mahatma Gandhi in a bitter, escalating industrial dispute between wealthy Indian textile mill owners (prominently led by Ambalal Sarabhai) and thousands of impoverished, striking mill workers.
- The Plague Bonus Conflict: The core conflict arose when the owners attempted to abruptly and completely withdraw the ‘Plague Bonus’—a significant wage supplement introduced earlier during a severe epidemic—while the workers desperately demanded a 50% wage hike to combat severe wartime inflation.
- The First Fast Unto Death: Gandhi advised the workers to remain strictly non-violent and demand a rational, calculated 35% wage increase. When the workers’ resolve began to weaken under extreme financial starvation, Gandhi undertook his very first public “fast unto death” in India to rally their sagging spirits and exert moral pressure on the owners.
- Successful Arbitration: This extreme moral pressure, combined with public sympathy, forced the stubborn mill owners to finally submit to an independent arbitration tribunal. The tribunal ultimately validated Gandhi’s mathematical stance and officially awarded the workers the exact 35% wage increase they had demanded.
📌 Revolutionary Acts • Modern History
Q.19) The draconian Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act, which allowed the British to arrest and imprison suspects without trial, was passed in 1919. By what popular name was it known?
Ans > B) Rowlatt Act
- Extending Wartime Powers: The Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919, universally despised and popularly known simply as the Rowlatt Act, was hurriedly enacted based on the highly paranoid recommendations of the Sir Sidney Rowlatt Committee.
- Suppressing Civil Liberties: This draconian piece of legislation effectively extended the emergency wartime executive powers (from the Defence of India Act) into peacetime. It allowed the colonial government to ruthlessly suppress nationalist activities by bypassing normal judicial procedures.
- “No Dalil, No Vakil, No Appeal”: It explicitly authorized the arbitrary arrest of any Indian suspected of treason and permitted their indefinite imprisonment without a trial. It fundamentally stripped citizens of the basic right to habeas corpus and legal representation, famously summarized by Indians in the slogan: “No Dalil, No Vakil, No Appeal.”
- Sparking Nationwide Protest: The passage of this deeply insulting Act, coming right after India’s massive blood-and-treasure contributions to the British effort in World War I, triggered widespread, furious outrage. It led Mahatma Gandhi to launch his first genuinely nationwide mass protest, the Rowlatt Satyagraha, marking a turning point in the freedom struggle.
📌 Mass Movements • Modern History
Q.20) The Jallianwala Bagh massacre, a pivotal event that alienated Indians from British rule, took place in Amritsar on which date?
Ans > B) April 13, 1919
- The Baisakhi Gathering: The horrifying Jallianwala Bagh massacre occurred on April 13, 1919, tragically coinciding with the peaceful, auspicious Punjabi harvest festival of Baisakhi, marking one of the absolute darkest chapters in global British colonial history.
- Peaceful Protest Against Rowlatt: A massive, unarmed crowd comprising thousands of men, women, and children had gathered in the enclosed Jallianwala Bagh ground in Amritsar to peacefully protest the unjust, secretive arrests of prominent local nationalist leaders Dr. Saifuddin Kitchlew and Dr. Satyapal under the draconian Rowlatt Act.
- General Dyer’s Brutality: Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer, seeking to deliberately “produce a moral effect” and strike ultimate terror across Punjab, blocked the only narrow exit. He ordered his Gurkha and Baloch troops to fire continuously into the dense, trapped crowd without any prior warning to disperse.
- A Shattered Faith: The troops fired exactly 1,650 rounds of ammunition until their magazines were entirely exhausted, officially killing 379 people (with Indian estimates easily exceeding 1,000 dead). This act of cold-blooded, calculated brutality permanently and irreparably shattered any remaining Indian faith in the concept of British justice.
📌 Mass Movements • Modern History
Q.21) To protest against the unjust treatment of the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) after World War I, the All India Khilafat Committee was formed in early 1919 in which city?
Ans > C) Bombay
- Pan-Islamic Origins: The Khilafat Movement was a powerful, pan-Islamic political protest campaign launched by Indian Muslims in early 1919. Its primary objective was to fiercely protect the temporal and spiritual authority of the Ottoman Sultan, who was revered globally as the Caliph (Khalifa) of Islam.
- Fears Over the Caliphate: Following the comprehensive defeat of the Ottoman Empire by the Allied powers in World War I, Indian Muslims deeply feared the British would dismantle the Caliphate and sever Muslim administrative control over highly sacred Islamic holy sites located in the Middle East.
- Formation in Bombay: To effectively coordinate the agitation, the All India Khilafat Committee was formally established in Bombay. It was spearheaded under the highly dynamic leadership of the Ali Brothers (Maulana Shaukat Ali and Maulana Muhammad Ali), along with Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Hasrat Mohani.
- Merging with Nationalism: Mahatma Gandhi astutely recognized this crisis as a rare, once-in-a-century opportunity to cement unbreakable Hindu-Muslim unity against the British. He successfully convinced the reluctant Indian National Congress to fully merge the Khilafat cause with the upcoming Non-Cooperation Movement, creating a unified anti-colonial front.
📌 Mass Movements • Modern History
Q.22) The program of the Non-Cooperation Movement was definitively adopted and endorsed by the Indian National Congress at its annual session in December 1920 held in which city?
Ans > B) Nagpur
- The Nagpur Endorsement: The annual session of the Indian National Congress held in Nagpur in December 1920 is a massive watershed moment because it definitively cemented Mahatma Gandhi’s absolute, unquestioned leadership over the entire national movement.
- Overcoming Internal Opposition: While the highly radical Non-Cooperation resolution was initially passed in a contentious special session in Calcutta earlier that year (facing fierce opposition from veteran leaders like C.R. Das), at Nagpur, C.R. Das himself surprisingly moved the main resolution, signifying total party unity.
- The Program of Boycott: The Nagpur session officially endorsed the sweeping, radical program of non-cooperation. This included the formal surrender of British titles, massive boycotts of government-run schools, courts, and foreign goods, and the ultimate threat of non-payment of oppressive colonial taxes.
- A Revolutionary Constitution: Crucially, the Congress radically altered its very constitution at this session. It shifted its ultimate goal from attaining self-government through polite “constitutional means” to achieving Purna Swaraj (complete independence) through “peaceful and legitimate means,” permanently transforming it into a true mass-based revolutionary party.
📌 Mass Movements • Modern History
Q.23) The violent incident in which an angry mob set fire to a police station, killing 22 policemen, led Mahatma Gandhi to abruptly call off the Non-Cooperation Movement. Where and when did this occur?
Ans > B) Chauri Chaura, February 1922
- The Trigger for Suspension: The infamous Chauri Chaura incident occurred on February 5, 1922, in a small market town in the Gorakhpur district of the United Provinces (modern-day Uttar Pradesh), fundamentally altering the immediate course of the Indian freedom struggle.
- Police Violence and Retaliation: A large, initially peaceful group of protesting peasants and Congress volunteers participating in the Non-Cooperation Movement were violently lathi-charged and fired upon by the local British police force.
- The Arson Attack: In uncontrollable retaliation, the infuriated mob chased the fleeing policemen into the local police station, locked the heavy doors from the outside, and set the entire building ablaze. This horrific act resulted in the gruesome deaths of 22 policemen and three civilians.
- Gandhi’s Dogmatic Stance: Mahatma Gandhi, who held an uncompromising, dogmatic belief in total non-violence (Ahimsa) as a prerequisite for freedom, was deeply disturbed by this massive bloodshed. He unilaterally called off the massive nationwide Non-Cooperation Movement, despite fierce protests, anger, and severe dismay from top leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose.
📌 Swarajists • Modern History
Q.24) Disillusioned by the suspension of the Non-Cooperation Movement, which two leaders formed the Congress-Khilafat Swarajya Party (Swaraj Party) in 1923 to contest legislative council elections?
Ans > B) C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru
- Political Vacuum and Split: The sudden, abrupt withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement in 1922 created a massive political vacuum and severe ideological demoralization within the ranks of the Indian National Congress, leading to a sharp internal split.
- Pro-Changers vs. No-Changers: The Congress divided into the “No-Changers” (like Sardar Patel and Rajendra Prasad, who wanted to focus strictly on Gandhi’s constructive rural work) and the “Pro-Changers” (who fiercely advocated for direct, continued political engagement with the British state).
- Formation of the Swaraj Party: Leading the Pro-Changers, political stalwarts C.R. Das (serving as President) and Motilal Nehru (serving as Secretary) formed the Congress-Khilafat Swarajya Party (commonly known as the Swaraj Party) on January 1, 1923, specifically to contest the upcoming legislative council elections.
- Wrecking from Within: Their brilliant political strategy was absolutely not to cooperate with the British, but to aggressively enter the colonial legislative councils to deliberately obstruct official business, consistently out-vote the government, expose the inherent flaws of the 1919 Act, and essentially wreck the colonial administration from within.
📌 British Commissions • Modern History
Q.25) In 1927, the British government appointed a statutory commission to review India’s constitutional progress. What was the popular name of this all-white commission?
Ans > B) Simon Commission
- Premature Appointment: The British government abruptly appointed the Indian Statutory Commission in 1927, fully two years ahead of its scheduled timeline, to evaluate the political impact of the 1919 Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms and recommend further constitutional changes for India.
- The All-White Insult: Led by Sir John Simon, the commission absolutely infuriated the entire Indian political spectrum because it consisted exclusively of seven British Members of Parliament and deliberately, completely excluded any Indian representation.
- A Unified Boycott: This blatant racial insult surprisingly united fiercely divided Indian political parties; the Congress, the Muslim League (under Jinnah), and the Hindu Mahasabha all unanimously decided to aggressively boycott the commission at every stage and in every possible form.
- “Simon Go Back”: When the commission arrived in 1928, it was met with unprecedented nationwide hartals (strikes), massive black flag demonstrations, and deafening, angry chants of “Simon Go Back,” leading to severe police repressions, during which the great leader Lala Lajpat Rai was fatally injured by a brutal police lathi charge.
📌 Constitutional Frameworks • Modern History
Q.26) The Nehru Report, published in 1928, was the first major attempt by Indians to draft a constitutional framework. What was its primary political demand?
Ans > B) Dominion Status
- The First Indian Constitution Draft: The Nehru Report of 1928 was a deeply historic milestone as it represented the very first major, comprehensive attempt by Indians themselves to independently draft a constitutional framework for their own country.
- A Response to Lord Birkenhead: It was formulated by an All-Parties Conference committee headed by Motilal Nehru. It was drafted as a direct, powerful response to the arrogant, racist challenge posed by the British Secretary of State, Lord Birkenhead, who claimed Indians were simply incapable of reaching any constitutional consensus.
- The Demand for Dominion Status: The report’s central, most critical political demand was the immediate granting of ‘Dominion Status’ to India (similar to the self-governing models of Canada or Australia), rather than complete severance from the British Empire, which severely disappointed radical younger leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose.
- Rejecting Separate Electorates: Crucially, the report strongly and explicitly rejected the divisive concept of separate communal electorates. Instead, it advocated for universal adult suffrage and joint electorates, with reserved seats strictly provided for minorities at the center and in specific provinces where they were in a minority.
📌 Pacts & Treaties • Modern History
Q.27) Rejecting the Nehru Report’s recommendations, Muhammad Ali Jinnah proposed his own set of demands to protect Muslim political rights in 1929. What is this proposal famous as?
Ans > C) Jinnah’s Fourteen Points
- Rejection of the Nehru Report: Muhammad Ali Jinnah categorically and vehemently rejected the constitutional framework proposed by the Nehru Report in 1928, arguing that its fundamental provision for joint electorates severely endangered the political survival and rights of the Muslim minority in a Hindu-majority India.
- Formulating the Fourteen Points: In March 1929, he convened a crucial meeting of the Muslim League in Delhi and presented a highly specific, comprehensive alternative political manifesto that came to be famously known as “Jinnah’s Fourteen Points.”
- Core Muslim Demands: The most critical, uncompromising demands in these points included the mandatory continuation of separate electorates for Muslims, a weak federal center with residual powers heavily vested in the provinces (where Muslims had majorities in some), and a guaranteed minimum of one-third Muslim representation in the Central Legislature.
- Setting the Stage for Partition: These fourteen points essentially became the bedrock, non-negotiable political demands of the Muslim League for the next critical decade. They fundamentally widened the unbridgeable communal rift with the Congress and set the deep ideological stage for the eventual, tragic partition of India.
📌 Mass Movements • Modern History
Q.28) The historic Lahore session of the Indian National Congress in 1929 passed the ‘Purna Swaraj’ resolution. Who was the President of this session?
Ans > C) Jawaharlal Nehru
- A Defining Moment: The Lahore session of the Indian National Congress held in December 1929 is unequivocally one of the most defining, radical moments in the entire history of the Indian freedom struggle, fundamentally altering its ultimate objective.
- Leadership of the Youth: The session was presided over by a young, highly dynamic Jawaharlal Nehru—representing the radical, socialist-leaning youth wing of the party—signaling a massive generational shift in the Congress’s leadership away from the older moderates.
- The Purna Swaraj Resolution: Under Nehru’s presidency, the Congress formally abandoned its earlier, moderate demand for Dominion Status. The session passed the historic ‘Purna Swaraj’ resolution, declaring that the ultimate, non-negotiable goal of the Indian national movement was complete and total political independence from the British Empire.
- The First Independence Day: To powerfully symbolize this massive ideological shift, the newly designed tricolor flag of India was hoisted on the banks of the Ravi River at midnight on December 31, 1929. Furthermore, January 26, 1930, was designated to be celebrated as the first Independence Day (which is exactly why India later chose January 26 to formally adopt its Republic Constitution).
📌 Civil Disobedience • Modern History
Q.29) Mahatma Gandhi initiated the Civil Disobedience Movement by launching the Dandi March to break the salt law. On what exact date did the march begin?
Ans > B) March 12, 1930
- Initiating Civil Disobedience: The historic Dandi March, also widely known as the Salt Satyagraha, was the spectacular, brilliantly calculated event launched by Mahatma Gandhi to formally initiate the nationwide Civil Disobedience Movement against British colonial rule.
- The Journey Begins: Beginning precisely on March 12, 1930, Gandhi and exactly 78 deeply trusted ashram volunteers embarked on an exhausting, highly publicized 240-mile walking journey from the Sabarmati Ashram in Ahmedabad to the small coastal village of Dandi in Gujarat.
- Targeting the Salt Tax: Gandhi specifically chose the highly oppressive British salt tax as his primary target because salt was a basic, absolute necessity for daily survival, affecting the poorest of the poor. This guaranteed massive, unified emotional resonance across all classes, castes, and religions throughout India.
- Breaking the Law: The grueling 24-day march culminated on the morning of April 6, 1930, when Gandhi famously bent down and picked up a lump of salt-rich mud, boiling seawater to produce illegal salt. This simple act officially defied the mighty British empire and immediately sparked a massive, uncontrollable wave of salt law violations, forest law breaches, and tax strikes across the entire Indian subcontinent.
📌 Pacts & Treaties • Modern History
Q.30) The Civil Disobedience Movement was temporarily suspended following an agreement that allowed the Congress to participate in the Second Round Table Conference. What was this agreement, signed on March 5, 1931?
Ans > B) Gandhi-Irwin Pact
- Negotiating as Equals: The Gandhi-Irwin Pact (also known as the Delhi Pact), officially signed on March 5, 1931, in New Delhi, marked an unprecedented political moment where the mighty British Viceroy, Lord Irwin, negotiated on strictly equal terms with Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of a mass colonial rebellion.
- The British Motivation: The British government, heavily battered by the economic boycotts and the sheer, ungovernable scale of the Civil Disobedience Movement, desperately needed the Indian National Congress to participate in the upcoming Second Round Table Conference in London to give it any legitimacy.
- Concessions Granted: Through this strategic pact, the British agreed to immediately release thousands of political prisoners (specifically those who had not been convicted of violence), unconditionally permit the peaceful picketing of liquor and foreign cloth shops, and allow coastal villagers to legally manufacture salt for their personal consumption.
- Suspension and Criticism: In return for these concessions, Gandhi agreed to temporarily suspend the massive Civil Disobedience Movement and act as the sole representative of the Congress at the London talks. However, the pact drew severe, lasting criticism from radical youth for Gandhi’s failure to secure a pardon or commutation of the death sentence for the beloved revolutionary Bhagat Singh.
📌 Quick Summary — Modern History Set 82
- Labor Organizations: Lala Lajpat Rai became the first AITUC President (1920). Whitley Commission (1929) probed labor conditions.
- Legislative Acts: Trade Disputes Act (1929) banned sympathetic strikes; Rowlatt Act (1919) allowed detention without trial.
- Civil Services: Satyendranath Tagore cracked the ICS exam first in 1863.
- INC Early Phase: First session had 72 delegates (1885). First female speaker: Kadambini Ganguly (1890). Dufferin turned hostile to INC.
- Partition & Boycott: Bengal partitioned on Oct 16, 1905. Swadeshi movement launched on Aug 7, 1905.
- Ideological Shifts: INC formally split in Surat (1907). Reunited via the Lucknow Pact (1916) brokered by Tilak and Jinnah.
- Reforms & Demands: Morley-Minto (1909) brought separate electorates. Nehru Report (1928) demanded Dominion Status. Jinnah countered with 14 Points (1929).
- Home Rule: Tilak operated from Pune; Annie Besant from Adyar, Madras (1916).
- Gandhian Entry: First Satyagraha in Champaran (1917). First Non-Cooperation in Kheda (1918). First hunger strike in Ahmedabad (1918).
- Mass Movements: Jallianwala Bagh occurred April 13, 1919. Khilafat Committee formed in Bombay (1919). Non-cooperation endorsed in Nagpur (1920) but halted post-Chauri Chaura (1922).
- Purna Swaraj & Dandi: Swaraj Party founded (1923) by C.R. Das & Motilal Nehru. Simon Commission boycotted (1927). Jawaharlal Nehru declared Purna Swaraj (1929). Dandi March began March 12, 1930. Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931) paused Civil Disobedience.
Timer ⏳
15:00
Progress (0/30)
Click any card to flip and reveal the summarized answer!
Smart Review: Questions you got wrong appear here for focused study.