Polity Set 137
π
π Indian Constitution β’ Special Provisions
Q.1) Article 371 of the Constitution provides special provisions for which two states, establishing separate development boards for Vidarbha, Marathwada, Saurashtra, and Kutch?
Ans > Maharashtra and Gujarat
- Historical Context of Article 371: This provision was heavily modified by the 7th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1956. During the reorganization of states on linguistic lines, the massive bilingual state of Bombay was eventually split, necessitating special developmental focus on specific socio-economically backward regions within the newly formed states of Maharashtra and Gujarat.
- Special Powers of the Governor: Under this provision, the President of India is authorized to vest special responsibilities in the Governors of Maharashtra and Gujarat. This unique constitutional setup means the Governor acts with discretionary power, independent of the state council of ministers, to ensure equitable development in these specific regions.
- Function of Development Boards: The core objective is to establish separate and dedicated development boards for Vidarbha and Marathwada (in Maharashtra) and Saurashtra and Kutch (in Gujarat). These boards must publish annual reports detailing their developmental activities, which are mandatorily placed before the State Legislative Assembly.
- Equitable Allocation of Resources: Beyond administrative oversight, the provision constitutionally ensures an equitable allocation of state funds for developmental expenditure. It also guarantees equitable arrangements providing adequate facilities for technical education, vocational training, and balanced employment opportunities in state government services for the youth of these regions.
π Indian Constitution β’ Special Provisions
Q.2) Under Article 371A, special provisions are made for the state of Nagaland. Which district in Nagaland is specifically mentioned as having a special regional council?
Ans > Tuensang
- The 13th Amendment Act (1962): Article 371A was inserted into the Indian Constitution by the 13th Constitutional Amendment Act. This amendment was born out of a 16-point political agreement reached in 1960 between the Government of India and the Naga Peopleβs Convention to bring peace and establish Nagaland as a full-fledged state.
- Protection of Customary Laws: This article firmly dictates that no Act of the Indian Parliament shall apply to the State of Nagaland regarding Naga religious or social practices, Naga customary law and procedure, or the ownership and transfer of land and its resources, unless the Nagaland Legislative Assembly specifically passes a resolution allowing it.
- The Tuensang Regional Council: The Constitution mandated the creation of a special regional council for the Tuensang district, consisting of 35 members. For a period of ten years from the formation of the state (or longer if deemed necessary), the administration of this specific district was placed directly under the Governor’s charge due to its unique socio-economic backwardness.
- Governor’s Special Responsibility: The Governor of Nagaland was granted special responsibility regarding law and order in the state as long as internal disturbances caused by hostile elements continued. In discharging this duty, the Governor is required to consult the Council of Ministers but ultimately exercises individual judgment, making the decision final.
π Indian Constitution β’ Special Provisions
Q.3) Article 371B provides for the creation of a committee of the Legislative Assembly consisting of members elected from the Tribal Areas of which state?
Ans > Assam
- The 22nd Amendment Act (1969): Article 371B was inserted into the Constitution by the 22nd Amendment Act in 1969. This period marked a significant reorganization of the North-Eastern region of India, aiming to balance the broader administrative needs of the state with the unique cultural and political aspirations of indigenous tribal populations.
- Formation of the Legislative Committee: The provision explicitly empowers the President of India to mandate the creation of a special committee within the Assam State Legislative Assembly. This is a unique internal parliamentary mechanism designed to ensure that specific geographic and demographic interests are formally represented within the broader state legislature.
- Representation of Tribal Areas: The committee is specifically composed of members elected from the Tribal Areas of Assam, which are specified in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. The President also holds the authority to direct the inclusion of other members of the Legislative Assembly into this committee to ensure balanced discourse.
- Objective and Functionality: The primary goal of this committee is to safeguard the interests of the tribal populations residing in Assam. By having a dedicated block within the assembly, the constitutional framework ensures that any state legislation impacting these tribal areas undergoes rigorous scrutiny by the very representatives who understand the local nuances, customary laws, and socio-economic challenges of the region.
π Indian Constitution β’ Special Provisions
Q.4) Article 371C provides for the constitution of a Hill Areas Committee in the Legislative Assembly of which state?
Ans > Manipur
- The 27th Amendment Act (1971): Article 371C was added to the Indian Constitution through the 27th Amendment Act in 1971. This occurred concurrently with the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, which elevated Manipur from the status of a Union Territory to a full-fledged State, necessitating specific safeguards for its distinct geographical divisions.
- Geographical Divide in Manipur: The demographic and geographic reality of Manipur is sharply divided between the Imphal Valley (predominantly inhabited by the Meitei community) and the surrounding Hill Areas (predominantly inhabited by various Naga and Kuki-Zo tribal communities). Article 371C was designed specifically to address this administrative and developmental dichotomy.
- Structure of the Hill Areas Committee: The President of India is empowered to provide for the constitution of a Hill Areas Committee comprising members of the Manipur Legislative Assembly who are elected directly from the Hill Areas. This ensures that the legislative voices of the tribal populations are institutionalized when state policies are formulated.
- Governor’s Reporting Duty: To ensure that the Hill Areas Committee functions effectively and that the developmental needs of these regions are not neglected, the Governor of Manipur is required to submit an annual report directly to the President of India. Furthermore, the Union Government retains the executive power to give directions to the State government concerning the proper administration of these specific Hill Areas.
π Indian Constitution β’ Special Provisions
Q.5) Article 371D empowers the President to provide for equitable opportunities and facilities for the people of which state in matters of public employment and education?
Ans > Andhra Pradesh (and later extended to Telangana)
- The 32nd Amendment Act (1973): Article 371D was introduced by the 32nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1973. This amendment was enacted in response to the massive “Jai Andhra” political agitation, which was sparked by severe regional disparities and perceived injustices regarding public employment and educational opportunities between the Andhra and Telangana regions.
- Presidential Empowerment for Equity: The core feature of Article 371D is that it grants extraordinary powers to the President of India to issue orders ensuring “equitable opportunities and facilities” for the people belonging to different parts of the state. This is a unique deviation from the general principle of equality of opportunity (Article 16), tailored for historical redressal.
- Zonal System in Employment and Education: To implement this equity, the Presidential Order created a complex “Zonal System.” It allowed the state government to divide the state into different local cadres for civil services and organize educational institutions into local areas, thereby reserving a significant percentage of government jobs and university seats strictly for local candidates of that specific zone.
- Administrative Tribunal Establishment: Article 371D also led to the creation of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (APAT). This specialized tribunal was established to exercise sole jurisdiction over disputes and grievances relating to the appointment, allotment, and conditions of service of state government employees, effectively bypassing the initial jurisdiction of the High Court on these specific matters.
π Amendments β’ Special Provisions
Q.6) Article 371F contains special provisions regarding the state of Sikkim. It was inserted into the Constitution by which Amendment Act?
Ans > 36th Amendment Act (1975)
- Transition from Protectorate to State: Prior to 1974, Sikkim was an independent protectorate of India ruled by the Chogyal monarchy. The 35th Amendment Act (1974) initially made Sikkim an “Associate State” of India. However, following a historic referendum where the people voted to abolish the monarchy, the 36th Amendment Act (1975) formally integrated Sikkim as the 22nd state of the Indian Union.
- Assembly Strength and Representation: Article 371F stipulates that the Legislative Assembly of Sikkim shall consist of not less than 30 members. This was a critical provision to ensure that despite its small population and geographical size, the state maintains a robust and functional democratic legislature to represent its diverse ethnic groups.
- Protection of Ethnic Diversity: Recognizing the unique demographic makeup of the state (comprising Bhutias, Lepchas, and people of Nepali origin), Article 371F empowers the Parliament to protect the rights and interests of different sections of the population. This includes reserving seats in the State Assembly for specific communities to ensure proportional political representation and prevent marginalization.
- Special Powers of the Governor: Similar to other North-Eastern states, the Governor of Sikkim holds special responsibilities specifically regarding peace and the equitable arrangement of social and economic advancement for different sections of the population. In discharging these duties, the Governor acts in his discretion, subject to the directions issued by the President of India.
π Indian Constitution β’ Special Provisions
Q.7) Under Article 371G, no Act of Parliament regarding religious or social practices, customary law, or ownership and transfer of land applies to which state unless its Legislative Assembly decides so?
Ans > Mizoram
- The Mizo Peace Accord (1986): Article 371G was inserted by the 53rd Constitutional Amendment Act in 1986. This constitutional provision was a direct and necessary outcome of the historic Mizo Peace Accord signed between the Government of India and the Mizo National Front (MNF), which brought an end to two decades of armed insurgency in the region.
- Safeguarding Mizo Identity: The core of Article 371G mirrors the protections granted to Nagaland under Article 371A. It explicitly states that no act of the Indian Parliament shall apply to Mizoram concerning Mizo religious or social practices, Mizo customary law and procedures, administration of civil and criminal justice involving decisions according to customary law, and the ownership or transfer of land.
- Legislative Supremacy on Culture: By requiring that the Mizoram State Legislative Assembly must pass a formal resolution to allow any Central legislation on these sensitive cultural and land-related matters to be implemented, the Constitution ensures that the indigenous population retains absolute sovereignty over their ancestral traditions and territorial resources.
- Assembly Composition: Along with these cultural protections, Article 371G also guarantees the structural integrity of the state’s democracy by mandating that the Legislative Assembly of the State of Mizoram shall consist of not less than forty members, ensuring adequate geographic and demographic representation across the rugged terrain of the state.
π Indian Constitution β’ Special Provisions
Q.8) Article 371H grants the Governor special responsibility with respect to law and order. This provision applies to which state?
Ans > Arunachal Pradesh
- The 55th Amendment Act (1986): Article 371H was introduced into the Constitution through the 55th Amendment Act in 1986. This legislative change accompanied the State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, which elevated Arunachal Pradesh from the status of a Union Territory (formerly known as the North-East Frontier Agency or NEFA) to a full-fledged State of the Indian Union.
- Governor’s Discretion on Law and Order: The defining feature of Article 371H is that it grants the Governor of Arunachal Pradesh a “special responsibility” regarding law and order in the state. While the Governor must consult with the Council of Ministers, the final decision is based entirely on their individual judgment.
- Geopolitical Sensitivities: This unique discretionary power was deemed essential due to the highly sensitive geopolitical location of Arunachal Pradesh. The state shares an extensive and highly disputed international border with China (Tibet), as well as borders with Myanmar and Bhutan, requiring the Union Government (through the Governor) to maintain strict oversight over regional security and stability.
- Minimum Assembly Strength: In addition to the Governor’s special powers, Article 371H also contains a structural mandate for the state’s democratic framework, dictating that the Legislative Assembly of Arunachal Pradesh shall consist of not less than thirty members, ensuring sufficient representation for the scattered tribal populations across the Himalayan terrain.
π Indian Constitution β’ State Legislatures
Q.9) Article 371I stipulates that the Legislative Assembly of which state shall consist of not less than 30 members?
Ans > Goa
- The 56th Amendment Act (1987): Article 371I was incorporated into the Indian Constitution via the 56th Constitutional Amendment Act in 1987. This amendment was a direct consequence of the Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, which formally separated Goa from the Union Territory structure and conferred upon it the status of a full-fledged independent State.
- Addressing Geographic Constraints: Unlike the other provisions in the 371 series (such as 371A or 371G) that focus heavily on protecting tribal customs, land rights, or establishing special development boards, Article 371I is incredibly brief and serves a purely structural and democratic purpose for the newly formed state.
- Constitutional Minimums: The general constitutional rule under Article 170 dictates that a State Legislative Assembly must have between 60 and 500 members. Because Goa is geographically tiny with a relatively small population, strictly adhering to the 60-member minimum was highly impractical and would have led to geographically microscopic constituencies.
- Democratic Practicality: By explicitly mandating in Article 371I that the Goa Legislative Assembly “shall consist of not less than thirty members” (it currently has exactly 40 members), the Constitution provided a necessary legal exception. This allowed Goa to establish a functional, proportionate, and practical legislative body that accurately represents its electorate without overcrowding the assembly.
π Amendments β’ Special Provisions
Q.10) The 98th Constitutional Amendment Act (2012) added Article 371J to provide special provisions for the Hyderabad-Karnataka region (now Kalyana Karnataka) in which state?
Ans > Karnataka
- The 98th Amendment Act (2012): Article 371J was added to the Constitution by the 98th Amendment Act in 2012. This amendment was introduced to address decades of persistent socio-economic backwardness, poor human development indices, and administrative neglect in a specific geographic zone of southern India.
- The Kalyana Karnataka Region: The provision specifically targets the erstwhile Hyderabad-Karnataka region (officially renamed Kalyana Karnataka in 2019). This region comprises historically marginalized districts, including Gulbarga (Kalaburagi), Bidar, Raichur, Koppal, Yadgir, and Bellary, which were formerly part of the princely state of Hyderabad before state reorganization.
- Establishment of a Development Board: Article 371J empowers the President to require the Governor of Karnataka to establish a dedicated regional development board for the Kalyana Karnataka region. The primary mandate of this board is to ensure the equitable allocation of state funds specifically earmarked for developmental projects in these districts.
- Reservations in Education and Employment: Crucially, the provision mandates the reservation of seats in educational and vocational training institutions within the region strictly for students who belong to that region. Furthermore, it ensures the reservation of a specified proportion of state government jobs within the region for local residents, structurally addressing systemic unemployment and educational deficits.
π Amendments β’ Territory
Q.11) The 100th Constitutional Amendment Act (2015) was enacted to give effect to the acquiring of certain territories and the transfer of certain other territories between India and which country?
Ans > Bangladesh
- The Land Boundary Agreement (LBA): The 100th Amendment Act of 2015 was a historic diplomatic and constitutional milestone that operationalized the Land Boundary Agreement (LBA) signed between India and Bangladesh in 1974, along with its corresponding 2011 Protocol. The implementation required amending the First Schedule of the Indian Constitution, which defines the territorial limits of states.
- Resolution of the Enclave Issue: For decades, the Indo-Bangladesh border was complicated by the existence of 162 enclaves (chhitmahals)βsmall pockets of Indian territory completely surrounded by Bangladesh, and vice versa. This cartographic anomaly left thousands of residents effectively stateless, lacking basic infrastructure, citizenship rights, or access to law enforcement.
- Territorial Exchange Details: Under the constitutional amendment, India officially transferred 111 enclaves (encompassing roughly 17,160 acres) to Bangladesh. In return, Bangladesh transferred 51 enclaves (encompassing roughly 7,110 acres) to India. Furthermore, the agreement successfully resolved the status of un-demarcated border sectors and the adverse possessions of land.
- Impact on Bordering States: Because the Constitution mandates that transferring national territory requires a constitutional amendment, the 100th Amendment specifically altered the territorial boundaries of four Indian states that share a border with Bangladesh: Assam, West Bengal, Meghalaya, and Tripura. This move vastly improved border security management and ended a 68-year-old humanitarian crisis for the enclave residents.
π Amendments β’ Constitutional Bodies
Q.12) The 102nd Constitutional Amendment Act (2018) inserted which Article to grant constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC)?
Ans > Article 338B
- Evolution of the NCBC: Originally, the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) was merely a statutory body established in 1993 under the NCBC Act, primarily functioning on the directions of the Supreme Court following the landmark Indira Sawhney (Mandal Commission) judgment. It lacked the independent constitutional authority held by the commissions for SCs and STs.
- Insertion of Article 338B: The 102nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 2018 revolutionized the institutional framework for backward classes by inserting Article 338B. This article elevated the NCBC from a statutory body to a fully independent Constitutional Body, structurally aligning it with the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (Article 338) and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (Article 338A).
- Expanded Mandate and Powers: With constitutional status, the NCBC was granted the powers of a civil court trying a suit. Its mandate vastly expanded beyond merely recommending inclusion or exclusion in the Central OBC list; it now possesses the authority to actively investigate and monitor all matters relating to the constitutional and legal safeguards provided to the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBCs).
- Insertion of Article 342A: The same amendment also inserted Article 342A, which centralized the power to identify and notify the list of SEBCs (OBCs) for the purposes of the Central Government. It stipulated that the President, in consultation with the Governor of a state, could specify the SEBCs, and any subsequent modifications to this Central List could only be made by the Parliament.
π Amendments β’ Fundamental Rights
Q.13) The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act (2019) introduced a 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) by amending which two Articles?
Ans > Articles 15 and 16
- Historical Departure from Caste-Based Quotas: Prior to 2019, constitutional reservations in India were strictly granted based on “social and educational backwardness” (such as for SCs, STs, and OBCs). The 103rd Amendment Act represented a massive paradigm shift by introducing economic criteria as a standalone basis for affirmative action in India.
- Amending Fundamental Rights: To implement this, the amendment inserted clause (6) into Article 15 and clause (6) into Article 16 of the Constitution. Article 15(6) enables the state to make special provisions for the advancement of any Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) regarding admission to educational institutions, including private institutions (except minority institutions).
- Impact on Public Employment: Similarly, the insertion of Article 16(6) explicitly allows the government to reserve up to 10% of appointments or posts in favor of any Economically Weaker Sections of citizens in matters of public employment. This 10% quota is entirely independent of, and in addition to, the existing 50% reservation cap previously established by the Supreme Court for SC/ST/OBC categories.
- Supreme Court Validity (Janhit Abhiyan Case): The constitutional validity of the 103rd Amendment was heavily challenged on the grounds that it violated the “Basic Structure Doctrine” by breaching the 50% reservation ceiling and using purely economic criteria. In 2022, a 5-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court upheld the amendment in a 3:2 majority verdict, solidifying EWS reservations in law.
π Amendments β’ Parliament
Q.14) The 104th Constitutional Amendment Act extended the reservation of seats for SCs and STs in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, but it discontinued the nomination of which community?
Ans > Anglo-Indians
- Extension of SC/ST Political Reservations: Article 334 of the Indian Constitution originally provided that political reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies would expire ten years after the commencement of the Constitution. However, this deadline has been continually extended. The 104th Amendment Act (2019) extended this reservation for another 10 years, up to January 25, 2030.
- The Anglo-Indian Nomination Provision: Prior to this amendment, Article 331 allowed the President to nominate two members of the Anglo-Indian community to the Lok Sabha if the community was not adequately represented. Similarly, Article 333 allowed state Governors to nominate one Anglo-Indian member to the State Legislative Assembly.
- End of an Era: The 104th Amendment intentionally chose not to extend this nomination provision for the Anglo-Indian community, allowing it to naturally expire in January 2020. The rationale provided by the government was that the community’s socio-economic status had significantly improved and they were now adequately integrated into the broader democratic process.
- Impact on Parliamentary Mathematics: The immediate functional impact of discontinuing these nominations was a permanent reduction in the maximum possible strength of the Lok Sabha. The total possible numbers dropped from 545 (543 elected + 2 nominated) to 543 strictly elected members, bringing an end to a unique colonial-era legacy provision in the Indian democratic framework.
π Amendments β’ Federalism
Q.15) The 105th Constitutional Amendment Act (2021) was passed to restore the power of State Governments to identify and maintain their own lists of:
Ans > Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBCs / OBCs)
- The Maratha Reservation Judgment Catalyst: The necessity for the 105th Amendment arose directly from a 2021 Supreme Court judgment in the Maratha Reservation case. In that ruling, the Court interpreted the 102nd Amendment (which centralized power under Article 342A) to mean that State Governments had lost their power to identify SEBCs (OBCs) for their own state lists.
- Restoring Federal Balance: The Supreme Court’s interpretation caused massive political unrest across states, as maintaining state-specific OBC lists is crucial for local affirmative action. The Parliament unanimously passed the 105th Amendment Act to explicitly clarify that the centralizing effect of the 102nd Amendment applied only to the Central Government’s list of OBCs.
- Amending Article 342A: The 105th Amendment modified Article 342A to clearly distinguish between the Central List and the State Lists of backward classes. It categorically stated that every State and Union Territory has the absolute sovereign power to prepare and maintain its own separate list of Socially and Educationally Backward Classes for state-level public employment and education.
- Bypassing the NCBC for State Lists: Furthermore, the amendment clarified the scope of Article 338B. It ensured that while the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) must be consulted on major policy matters, State Governments are completely exempt from consulting the NCBC specifically when preparing or modifying their own State Lists of SEBCs, fully restoring state autonomy in this domain.
π Amendments β’ Women Empowerment
Q.16) The 106th Constitutional Amendment Act (2023), also known as the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, provides for what percentage of reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies?
Ans > 33% (One-third)
- Decades-Long Legislative Struggle: The demand for women’s political reservation in India’s highest legislative bodies has a long and turbulent history. Various iterations of the Women’s Reservation Bill had been introduced in Parliament multiple times since 1996, but they repeatedly lapsed due to lack of political consensus before finally passing nearly unanimously as the 106th Amendment in 2023.
- Scope of the 33% Reservation: The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam amends the Constitution to mandate that as nearly as possible, one-third (33%) of all seats filled by direct election in the Lok Sabha, State Legislative Assemblies, and the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi shall be explicitly reserved for women.
- Horizontal Reservation Structure: The womenβs reservation functions horizontally. This means the 33% quota is not entirely separate from existing categories; rather, one-third of the seats already reserved for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies will be specifically earmarked for women belonging to those respective communities.
- Implementation Dependency: Crucially, the implementation of the 106th Amendment is not immediate. The text of the law explicitly links the enforcement of the reservation to a future delimitation exercise (the redrawing of constituency boundaries). This delimitation process can only occur after the relevant figures from the first national Census conducted after the passage of the Act (2023) are published.
π Amendments β’ Legislature
Q.17) According to the 106th Amendment, the women’s reservation will be in effect for a period of how many years (subject to further extension by Parliament)?
Ans > 15 years
- The Sunset Clause: The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (106th Amendment) includes a specific “sunset clause” regarding its duration. The constitutional text mandates that the reservation of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies shall automatically cease to have effect on the expiration of a period of 15 years from the date of commencement of the Act.
- Parliamentary Power to Extend: While the initial period is capped at 15 years, the amendment explicitly grants the Indian Parliament the sovereign authority to extend this duration. If future legislatures determine that women are still not adequately represented naturally, they can pass a law to continue the quota, similar to how SC/ST political reservations are extended every 10 years.
- Rotation of Reserved Seats: To ensure that the same constituencies do not remain perpetually reserved for women, the amendment dictates that the reserved seats shall be rotated. The specific manner of this rotation will be determined by a law made by Parliament, typically executed during the periodic delimitation exercises to maintain democratic fairness across districts.
- Impact on Sitting Assemblies: The Act includes a crucial transitional safeguard to ensure democratic continuity. It specifies that the implementation of the women’s reservation shall not affect any representation in an existing Lok Sabha or State Legislative Assembly until that specific legislative body’s term naturally dissolves. It applies only to elections held post-implementation.
π Languages β’ Culture
Q.18) In 2014, which language became the sixth language in India to be granted the status of a “Classical Language”?
Ans > Odia
- Criteria for Classical Status: The Government of India established strict criteria in 2004 to declare languages as “Classical.” These include high antiquity of early texts/recorded history over a period of 1500β2000 years, a body of ancient literature considered a valuable heritage, and the literary tradition being original and not borrowed from another speech community.
- The First Five Languages: Before Odia, five other Indian languages had successfully proven their ancient linguistic heritage to achieve this status: Tamil was the first (2004), followed rapidly by Sanskrit (2005), Kannada (2008), Telugu (2008), and Malayalam (2013). Odia joined this prestigious list in 2014 based on the antiquity of texts like the Madala Panji and inscriptions found in Bhubaneswar.
- Benefits of the Recognition: Granting Classical Language status provides immense academic and financial benefits. It mandates the creation of two major international awards for scholars of eminence in that language, the establishment of a dedicated Centre of Excellence for studies in that language, and the creation of Professional Chairs in Central Universities.
- Recent Policy Updates: While Odia was the sixth language recognized in 2014, the scope of Classical Languages has expanded recently. In late 2024, the Union Cabinet officially approved the addition of Marathi, Pali, Prakrit, Assamese, and Bengali to the list, recognizing their distinct historical lineages and bringing the total number of recognized classical languages in India to eleven.
π Indian Constitution β’ Official Language
Q.19) Which Article in Part XVII of the Constitution directs the Union to promote the spread and development of the Hindi language?
Ans > Article 351
- The Directive for Development: Article 351 acts as a specific Constitutional directive regarding the linguistic future of the country. It explicitly assigns a duty to the Union Government to aggressively promote the spread of the Hindi language and to develop it comprehensively so that it may serve as a medium of expression for all the diverse elements of the composite culture of India.
- Assimilating Vocabulary: The Article provides precise instructions on how Hindi should be developed. It mandates that Hindi should secure its enrichment by assimilating the forms, style, and expressions used in Hindustani and in the other languages of India specified in the Eighth Schedule, ensuring it evolves as a truly pan-Indian language rather than remaining regionally isolated.
- Vocabulary Sourcing Priority: Regarding the expansion of its vocabulary, Article 351 explicitly instructs that whenever Hindi needs new words to express modern concepts (in science, law, or administration), it should draw primarily on Sanskrit, and only secondarily on other languages. This helps maintain linguistic consistency and ties to India’s classical roots.
- Balancing Federal Nuances: While Article 343 declares Hindi in the Devanagari script as the official language of the Union, Article 351 is the active mandate for its growth. However, this has often been a point of political friction, particularly in southern states, leading to debates on linguistic imposition versus the constitutional duty to forge a unifying national link language.
π Indian Constitution β’ Judiciary
Q.20) According to Article 348, until Parliament provides otherwise, all proceedings in the Supreme Court and in every High Court shall be in:
Ans > English
- Linguistic Uniformity in Higher Judiciary: Article 348 establishes the definitive linguistic framework for the higher echelons of the Indian judicial system. It mandates that until the Parliament enacts a law to change it, all proceedings, judgments, decrees, and orders in the Supreme Court of India and in every State High Court must exclusively be in the English language.
- Drafting of Bills and Acts: The reach of Article 348 extends beyond just the courts. It also strictly requires that the authoritative texts of all Bills introduced in, and Acts passed by, the Parliament or any State Legislature, as well as all Ordinances, Orders, Rules, and Regulations issued under the Constitution, must be published in the English language.
- Provisions for State Languages in High Courts: While English is the default, Article 348(2) provides a limited exception. The Governor of a State, with the prior consent of the President of India, can authorize the use of Hindi or the official language of that state in the proceedings of the state’s High Court. However, even in such cases, the final judgments and decrees must still be accompanied by an English translation.
- Rationale Behind the English Mandate: The framers of the Constitution recognized that Indian jurisprudence relies heavily on English common law, pre-independence statutes, and complex technical legal terminology. Mandating English ensures uniformity across the nation’s higher courts, allows judges from different linguistic backgrounds to serve across India, and maintains seamless legal continuity.
π Statutory Bodies β’ Judiciary
Q.21) The National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) was constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act of:
Ans > 1987
- Constitutional Mandate (Article 39A): The genesis of NALSA lies in Article 39A of the Constitution (inserted by the 42nd Amendment in 1976). This Directive Principle of State Policy mandates the State to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on a basis of equal opportunity, and specifically directs the state to provide free legal aid to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen due to economic or other disabilities.
- Statutory Framework Creation: To give legislative teeth to Article 39A, the Indian Parliament enacted the Legal Services Authorities Act in 1987. This Act aimed to create a uniform, nationwide network to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of society and to organize Lok Adalats to secure justice efficiently.
- Formation of NALSA: Although the Act was passed in 1987, the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) itself was formally constituted on November 9, 1995, after the Act was enforced. NALSA functions as the apex, central body that lays down the broad policies and principles for making legal services accessible under the Act and frames the most effective and economical schemes for this purpose.
- Decentralized Implementation: While NALSA operates at the national level, the 1987 Act established a deeply decentralized structure. It mandated the creation of State Legal Services Authorities (SLSA) at the state level, District Legal Services Authorities (DLSA) at the district level, and Taluk Legal Services Committees at the sub-divisional level to execute NALSA’s policies and directly assist citizens at the grassroots.
π Statutory Bodies β’ Judiciary
Q.22) Who acts as the Executive Chairman of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA)?
Ans > The second senior-most judge of the Supreme Court of India
- Leadership Structure of NALSA: The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 establishes a very specific judicial hierarchy at the helm of NALSA to ensure it functions with high authority and independence. The Chief Justice of India (CJI) acts as the Patron-in-Chief of the Authority, providing overarching guidance and symbolic leadership to the institution.
- Role of the Executive Chairman: While the CJI is the Patron, the actual administrative and operational leadership of NALSA is vested in the Executive Chairman. The statute strictly mandates that this position must be held by a serving or retired Judge of the Supreme Court of India, nominated by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice.
- The Convention of Seniority: By established convention and practice, the position of the Executive Chairman of NALSA is almost always occupied by the second senior-most judge of the Supreme Court (the judge poised to become the next Chief Justice). This ensures a smooth transition of leadership and maintains the highest level of judicial gravitas for the legal aid movement.
- Parallels in State Authorities: This structure is mirrored at the state level. For the State Legal Services Authority (SLSA), the Chief Justice of the respective State High Court serves as the Patron-in-Chief, while a serving or retired judge of that High Court (usually the senior-most after the Chief Justice) is nominated as the Executive Chairman by the Governor.
π Judiciary β’ Local Courts
Q.23) The Gram Nyayalayas Act, enacted in 2008 to provide access to justice at the grassroots level, dictates that Gram Nyayalayas shall be guided by:
Ans > The principles of natural justice
- Objective of the Gram Nyayalayas Act: The Gram Nyayalayas Act of 2008 was passed to establish village-level courts aimed at providing speedy, affordable, and accessible justice to citizens at their doorsteps. It operationalized the constitutional mandate of Article 39A to ensure that geographical and economic barriers do not prevent rural citizens from seeking legal redress.
- Presiding Officer (Nyayadhikari): A Gram Nyayalaya is presided over by a Nyayadhikari, who is a strictly judicial officer appointed by the State Government in consultation with the respective High Court. They hold the same rank and power as a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, ensuring professional judicial standards are maintained in rural areas.
- Flexibility in Civil Proceedings: To prevent rural litigants from getting bogged down in complex legal technicalities, the Act explicitly states that Gram Nyayalayas are not strictly bound by the rigid procedural rules laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) or the complex exclusionary rules of the Indian Evidence Act when dealing with civil disputes.
- Guided by Natural Justice: Instead of procedural rigidity, the Gram Nyayalaya is mandated to be guided by the overarching “principles of natural justice.” This means proceedings focus on fundamental fairness, giving both parties an equal opportunity to be heard, and acting without bias, while being subject to any specific rules made by the High Court to maintain judicial integrity.
π Judiciary β’ Specialized Courts
Q.24) The Family Courts Act was enacted in 1984 to promote conciliation and secure speedy settlement of disputes relating to marriage and family affairs. Family courts are established by the:
Ans > State Government in consultation with the High Court
- Rationale for the 1984 Act: Prior to 1984, family disputes were heard in regular civil courts, subjecting sensitive marital issues to highly adversarial, formal, and protracted litigation. The Family Courts Act was enacted to pull these disputes out of standard courts and place them in specialized forums that prioritize conciliation and amicable settlement over aggressive legal battles.
- Mandatory Establishment Criteria: Section 3 of the Family Courts Act lays down the rules for establishment. It mandates that the State Government, after consultation with the respective State High Court, must establish a Family Court for every city or town whose population exceeds one million. State Governments also have the discretionary power to establish them in smaller regions.
- Exclusive Jurisdiction on Family Matters: Once a Family Court is established in an area, it holds exclusive jurisdiction over matters specifically related to matrimonial relief (like divorce, restitution of conjugal rights, and nullity of marriage), property disputes between spouses, declarations of legitimacy, guardianship of minors, and maintenance for wives, children, and parents.
- Procedural Flexibility and Counseling: Similar to Gram Nyayalayas, Family Courts are not strictly bound by the rigid rules of the Indian Evidence Act. Furthermore, the Act mandates the association of social welfare agencies and highly trained professional counselors with the court process, requiring judges to first attempt to help the parties reach a mediated settlement before initiating a formal trial.
π Judiciary β’ Elections
Q.25) A dispute regarding the election of a Member of Parliament (MP) or a Member of a Legislative Assembly (MLA) is originally heard by the:
Ans > High Court of the respective state
- The Representation of the People Act, 1951: The legal framework for challenging elections in India is governed strictly by the Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951. While the Election Commission of India completely controls the conduct and administration of the election process, it does not have the judicial authority to resolve disputes regarding the validity of the results once an election concludes.
- Election Petitions: According to Article 329(b) of the Constitution, an election can only be called into question by presenting an “Election Petition.” The RPA of 1951 specifically designates the High Court of the respective state as the court of original jurisdiction to try and decide upon these election petitions for both MPs and MLAs.
- Grounds for Challenging an Election: A candidate’s election can be challenged in the High Court on several serious grounds. These primarily include the commission of “corrupt practices” (such as bribery, appealing to religion/caste for votes, or booth capturing), improper acceptance or rejection of nomination papers, or mass discrepancies in the counting of votes that materially affect the outcome.
- Appellate Authority of the Supreme Court: If a petitioner or the challenged candidate is dissatisfied with the judgment delivered by the High Court regarding the election petition, they have the statutory right to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of India. The Supreme Court serves as the final appellate authority on all electoral disputes concerning MPs and MLAs.
π Constitutional Bodies β’ Federalism
Q.26) The Inter-State Council was established in 1990 under Article 263. Who acts as the Chairman of the Inter-State Council?
Ans > The Prime Minister
- Constitutional Basis (Article 263): Article 263 of the Indian Constitution empowers the President of India to establish an Inter-State Council at any time if they believe the public interest would be served by it. This constitutional mechanism is designed specifically to foster cooperative federalism by resolving disputes between states and investigating subjects of common interest.
- The Sarkaria Commission Catalyst: Despite the provision existing since 1950, a permanent Inter-State Council was not established for decades. It was only after the rigorous recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission on Centre-State Relations (submitted in 1988) that a formal Presidential Order was finally issued in 1990 to establish a permanent Council.
- Composition and Chairmanship: The Inter-State Council is designed as a high-level political forum. It is Chaired by the Prime Minister of India. The core members include the Chief Ministers of all States and Union Territories with a legislative assembly, Administrators of UTs without assemblies, and six Union Cabinet Ministers (including the Home Minister) nominated directly by the Prime Minister.
- Functions of the Council: The Council’s primary mandate is to inquire into and advise upon disputes that may arise between states (though its recommendations are advisory, not legally binding like a Supreme Court decree). It also provides a crucial platform to investigate and discuss policy matters where the Union and multiple States share a common interest, promoting coordinated administrative action.
π Indian Constitution β’ Trade & Commerce
Q.27) Article 301 declares that trade, commerce, and intercourse shall be free throughout the territory of India. However, Article 302 allows who to impose restrictions on this freedom in the public interest?
Ans > The Parliament
- Freedom of Trade and Commerce: Part XIII of the Indian Constitution deals exclusively with trade, commerce, and intercourse within the territory of India. Article 301 establishes the foundational principle that trade across the entire country must be absolutely free from internal barriers, aiming to forge India into a single, unified, and seamless economic market.
- Parliamentary Authority for Restrictions: The freedom granted under Article 301 is not absolute. Article 302 explicitly empowers the Indian Parliament to impose by law such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce, or intercourse between one State and another, or within any part of the territory of India, as may be strictly required in the “public interest.”
- The Non-Discrimination Clause: While Parliament can restrict trade, Article 303 places a crucial limitation on this power. It dictates that Parliament cannot make any law that gives preference to one State over another, or discriminates between States, by virtue of any entry relating to trade and commerce in any of the legislative lists (unless there is a severe scarcity of goods in a specific part of India).
- State Level Restrictions: State Legislatures also possess limited power to restrict trade under Article 304. A State Legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the freedom of trade within its state in the public interest, but any such Bill must receive the prior sanction of the President of India before it can even be introduced in the State Assembly.
π Statutory Bodies β’ Anti-Corruption
Q.28) Which committee recommended the establishment of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)?
Ans > Santhanam Committee
- The Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption: In 1962, the Government of India faced growing public concern regarding administrative malfeasance and bribery. In response, it appointed a high-level Committee on the Prevention of Corruption, chaired by the eminent parliamentarian K. Santhanam. This committee was tasked with reviewing existing anti-corruption structures and suggesting sweeping reforms.
- Establishment via Executive Resolution: Acting directly on the forceful recommendations of the Santhanam Committee, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) was established in February 1964 via an executive resolution of the Government of India. Its primary mandate was to advise and guide Central Government agencies in the complex field of vigilance and administrative probity.
- Transition to Statutory Status: For over three decades, the CVC operated merely as an advisory body without formal legislative backing. This changed dramatically following the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in the Vineet Narain case. Consequently, the Parliament passed the Central Vigilance Commission Act in 2003, formally elevating the CVC to the status of an independent Statutory Body.
- Apex Integrity Institution: Today, the CVC is conceived as the apex vigilance institution in the country, remarkably independent of any executive authority. It monitors all vigilance activity under the Central Government, exercises superintendence over the CBI’s functioning regarding cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and advises various administrative authorities in planning and executing their anti-corruption efforts.
π Statutory Bodies β’ Tenure
Q.29) What is the maximum age limit for a person to serve as the Central Vigilance Commissioner?
Ans > 65 years
- Structure of the Commission: Under the CVC Act of 2003, the Commission is constituted as a multi-member body. It consists of a Central Vigilance Commissioner, who acts as the Chairperson, and not more than two Vigilance Commissioners acting as Members. This collegiate structure ensures balanced decision-making in sensitive anti-corruption matters.
- Stringent Tenure Limitations: To ensure absolute independence and prevent political entrenchment, the law dictates a very strict tenure. The Central Vigilance Commissioner and the Vigilance Commissioners hold office for a strict term of four years from the date they enter office, or until they attain the age of 65 years, whichever event occurs earlier.
- The High-Powered Appointment Committee: The appointment process is designed to be bipartisan. The President of India appoints the CVC and the VCs based entirely on the binding recommendation of a three-member committee. This vital committee consists of the Prime Minister (Chairperson), the Union Minister of Home Affairs, and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.
- Post-Retirement Restrictions: To further insulate the Commissioners from executive favors or future temptations, the CVC Act explicitly mandates that upon ceasing to hold office, the Central Vigilance Commissioner and every other Vigilance Commissioner are completely ineligible for any further diplomatic or political employment under the Central Government or any State Government.
π Statutory Bodies β’ Right to Information
Q.30) The Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners hold office for a term prescribed by the Central Government or until they attain the age of:
Ans > 65 years
- The Right to Information Act, 2005: The Central Information Commission (CIC) was established by the Central Government in 2005 under the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Commission functions as the highest appellate authority regarding the RTI framework, acting on complaints and second appeals from citizens denied information by government departments.
- The 2019 RTI Amendment Controversy: Originally, the RTI Act of 2005 fixed the tenure of the Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners at a flat 5 years, mirroring the Election Commission, to ensure autonomy. However, the contentious RTI (Amendment) Act of 2019 fundamentally altered this, empowering the Central Government to dynamically prescribe the length of their term.
- Current Age Ceiling and Reappointment: Despite the government now controlling the length of the tenure (currently prescribed as 3 years via rules), the absolute maximum age ceiling remains fixed by statute. The Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners must vacate their office upon attaining the age of 65 years. Crucially, they are completely ineligible for reappointment.
- Composition and Appointment: The Commission consists of a Chief Information Commissioner and up to ten Information Commissioners. They are appointed by the President on the recommendation of a committee comprising the Prime Minister (Chairperson), the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, and a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the PM, ensuring a degree of cross-party consensus in appointments.
π Quick Summary β Polity Set 137
- Special Provisions (Art 371): Establishes development boards for Maharashtra & Gujarat.
- Nagaland (Art 371A): Provides a 35-member regional council for Tuensang district.
- Assam (Art 371B): Creates a legislative committee for Tribal Areas.
- Manipur (Art 371C): Constitutes a Hill Areas Committee to represent tribal regions.
- Andhra Pradesh (Art 371D): Empowers the President to ensure equitable public employment and education.
- Sikkim (Art 371F): Inserted by the 36th Amendment Act (1975).
- Mizoram (Art 371G): Protects Mizo customary law and land ownership.
- Arunachal Pradesh (Art 371H): Grants the Governor special law and order responsibilities.
- Goa (Art 371I): Mandates a minimum of 30 Legislative Assembly members.
- Karnataka (Art 371J): 98th Amendment established provisions for the Kalyana Karnataka region.
- Land Boundary Agreement: The 100th Amendment (2015) exchanged enclaves with Bangladesh.
- NCBC Constitutional Status: The 102nd Amendment inserted Article 338B.
- EWS Quota (10%): The 103rd Amendment modified Articles 15 and 16.
- Anglo-Indian Nomination: The 104th Amendment discontinued these nominations in legislatures.
- OBC State Lists: The 105th Amendment restored states’ power to identify SEBCs.
- Women’s Reservation: The 106th Amendment (Nari Shakti Vandan) grants 33% reservation.
- Sunset Clause: The women’s reservation is initially in effect for 15 years.
- Classical Languages: Odia became the sixth classical language of India in 2014.
- Hindi Development: Article 351 directs the Union to promote the Hindi language.
- Judiciary Language: Article 348 mandates English for Supreme Court and High Courts proceedings.
- NALSA Creation: Constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987.
- NALSA Leadership: Executive Chairman is the 2nd senior-most SC judge.
- Gram Nyayalayas: Rural courts guided by the principles of natural justice.
- Family Courts: Established by State Governments consulting respective High Courts.
- Election Disputes: High Courts hold original jurisdiction over MP and MLA election disputes.
- Inter-State Council: A federal body chaired by the Prime Minister.
- Trade Restrictions: Article 302 allows Parliament to restrict free trade in the public interest.
- CVC Establishment: Recommended by the Santhanam Committee.
- CVC Tenure: Maximum age limit to serve is 65 years.
- CIC Tenure: Chief Information Commissioner must vacate office at age 65.
Timer β³
20:00
Progress (0/30)
Click any card to flip and reveal the summarized answer!
Smart Review: Questions you got wrong appear here for focused study.