Polity Set 65
🔍
📌 Polity • Union Executive
Q.1) The Constitution of India provides for a parliamentary form of government at the Centre under which Articles?
Ans > Articles 74 and 75
- Role of the Council of Ministers: Article 74 establishes a Council of Ministers, headed by the Prime Minister, to aid and advise the President. The President is constitutionally bound to act in accordance with this advice, effectively making the Prime Minister the real (de facto) executive authority, while the President remains the titular (de jure) head of state.
- Collective Responsibility: Article 75 strictly dictates that the entire Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha. This means they operate as a single team; if a no-confidence motion is successfully passed against the government, all ministers must resign unconditionally.
- Constitutional Amendments: The 42nd Amendment Act (1976) explicitly made the advice of the Council absolutely binding on the President. Later, the 44th Amendment Act (1978) granted the President the limited power to send the advice back for reconsideration just once, but if sent again, the advice becomes permanently binding.
- Appointment and Tenure: Article 75 also explicitly states that the Prime Minister is appointed by the President, and all other ministers are appointed by the President squarely on the binding advice of the Prime Minister. They officially hold office during the pleasure of the President.
📌 Polity • Constitutional Framework
Q.2) The parliamentary system of government is based on the principle of:
Ans > Cooperation and co-ordination between the legislative and executive organs
- Fusion of Powers: The Indian parliamentary system completely relies on the fusion of powers rather than a strict separation. The executive branch is drawn entirely from the legislative branch, meaning all ministers must be Members of Parliament (MPs) or become one within six months of appointment.
- Accountability Over Stability: The constitutional framers deliberately chose this specific system to prioritize daily and periodic accountability over absolute executive stability. The government must answer to the legislature daily through rigid mechanisms like Question Hour, Zero Hour, and Debates, contrasting sharply with the rigid American presidential system.
- The “Efficient Secret”: As prominently described by constitutional theorist Walter Bagehot, the “efficient secret” of the parliamentary system is the close union and nearly complete fusion of the executive and legislative powers, allowing for smoother law-making processes without institutional gridlock.
- Leadership of the Prime Minister: The system functions entirely on the leadership of the Prime Minister, who acts as the primary channel of communication between the President and the Cabinet, and leads the majority party in the lower house to confidently drive the national legislative agenda.
📌 Polity • Government System
Q.3) In a parliamentary system, the executive is responsible to the legislature for its policies and acts. This system is also known as:
Ans > All of the above
- Westminster Heritage: The system is historically named after the Palace of Westminster in London, the iconic seat of the British Parliament. India heavily adopted its parliamentary structure, procedures, and democratic traditions from the British colonial era, adapting them to a republican framework.
- Cabinet Government Role: It is widely referred to as a “Cabinet government” because the Cabinet—a smaller, elite inner core of the Council of Ministers consisting solely of senior cabinet ministers—acts as the steering wheel for the state. It takes all critical administrative, economic, and defense decisions on behalf of the larger council.
- Concept of Responsible Government: The executive is perpetually vulnerable to removal. It is termed a “responsible government” because the ministers are answerable to the Parliament (and through it, to the people) for all their acts of omission and commission. The mechanism of the no-confidence motion keeps dictatorial tendencies strictly in check.
- Prime Ministerial Government: In modern political analysis, due to the massive concentration of power in the hands of the Prime Minister, political scientists like Richard Crossman have increasingly started calling it a “Prime Ministerial government,” noting that the PM dominates both the cabinet and parliament.
📌 Polity • Federal System
Q.4) The Indian federal system is based on the ‘Canadian model’. Which of the following is NOT a feature of the Canadian model of federation?
Ans > Vesting of residuary powers in the states (provinces)
- Formation by Disintegration: Unlike the American federal model, which was formally created by a voluntary agreement of independent sovereign states coming together, the Canadian and Indian federations were formed through the administrative disintegration of a larger unified territory into distinct provinces or states for better governance.
- Vesting of Residuary Powers: In the US model, any power not explicitly written in the Constitution is left entirely to the states. However, in both the Canadian and Indian models, “residuary powers” (subjects not explicitly listed) are firmly vested in the hands of the Central/Union legislature to ensure absolute national uniformity.
- Centralizing Tendency: The Canadian model features a distinctly strong centralizing bias. The Indian Constitution adopted this exact approach to prevent balkanization and maintain unity in a highly diverse country. The Centre is given overriding powers in times of emergency and holds the most important subjects like defense and foreign affairs.
- Rejection of the Term ‘Federation’: Following the clear Canadian example, the Indian Constitution deliberately avoids the word “Federation” entirely and instead uses “Union of States,” signifying that states absolutely do not have the legal right to secede from the national entity.
📌 Polity • Features of Constitution
Q.5) Which of the following is considered a ‘Unitary’ or ‘Non-Federal’ feature of the Indian Constitution?
Ans > Single Citizenship
- Promoting National Unity: The Indian Constitution provides for a strict single citizenship for all its people, irrespective of the state they are born in or currently reside in. This was a highly deliberate choice by the drafting committee to foster a strong sense of national fraternity and prevent regionalism.
- Contrast with Classical Federations: In classical federations like the United States or Switzerland, citizens hold dual citizenship—one of the national federal government and one of their respective states. This allows states to provide special privileges to their own citizens, a concept India strictly avoided to maintain equal rights across the country.
- Parliamentary Monopoly on Citizenship: Articles 5 to 11 in Part II of the Constitution outline citizenship at commencement. Crucially, the Citizenship Act of 1955 comprehensively governs the acquisition and termination of Indian citizenship, completely excluding state governments from this vital legislative domain.
- Other Unitary Features: Alongside single citizenship, the Indian Constitution contains several other non-federal or unitary features. These notably include a strong Centre, a single integrated judiciary (the Supreme Court at the apex), the appointment of state Governors by the Centre, and flexible constitutional amendment procedures that heavily favor Parliament.
📌 Polity • Union of States
Q.6) Has the word ‘Federation’ been used anywhere in the Indian Constitution?
Ans > No, it has nowhere been used in the Constitution
- Article 1 Designation: The word “Federation” is entirely and intentionally absent from the text of the Indian Constitution. Instead, Article 1 explicitly and deliberately describes India, that is Bharat, strictly as a “Union of States.”
- Dr. Ambedkar’s Clarification: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar famously explained in the Constituent Assembly that the word “Union” was chosen to signify two critical things: first, that the Indian federation is not the result of a voluntary agreement among independent states, and second, that the states have absolutely no right to secede from it.
- Indestructible Union of Destructible States: Political scientists often describe India’s unique model as an “indestructible union of destructible states.” Under Article 3, the central Parliament has the unilateral authority to alter the boundaries, areas, or names of existing states, or create entirely new ones, without the states’ binding consent.
- Quasi-Federal Nature: Because of the complete absence of a strict federal structure and the presence of massive centralizing features, prominent scholars like K.C. Wheare accurately described the Indian Constitution as “quasi-federal”—a unitary state with subsidiary federal features rather than a federal state with subsidiary unitary features.
📌 Polity • Centre-State Relations
Q.7) Part XI of the Constitution deals with the legislative relations between the Centre and the states. Which Articles cover this?
Ans > Articles 245 to 255
- Structure of Part XI: Part XI of the Indian Constitution is explicitly dedicated to Centre-State relations. It is divided into two chapters. Chapter I (comprising Articles 245 to 255) specifically governs the complex legislative relations, dictating exactly who can make laws on what subjects and outlining the balance of power.
- Territorial Extent of Legislation: Article 245 establishes the territorial jurisdiction of laws. It dictates that Parliament can make laws for the whole or any part of the territory of India, whereas a State Legislature is strictly restricted to making laws only for the whole or any part of that specific state.
- Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: A highly unique feature granted to the Union Parliament is extraterritorial power. Only Parliament has the constitutional authority to make laws that apply to Indian citizens and their property anywhere in the world; state legislative assemblies absolutely lack this capability.
- Distribution via the Seventh Schedule: The actual distribution of legislative subjects is managed through the Seventh Schedule (Article 246), which definitively divides powers into the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List, providing a clear demarcation of federal legislative authority.
📌 Polity • Legislative Powers
Q.8) Under Article 248, the residuary powers of legislation (subjects not enumerated in any of the three lists of the Seventh Schedule) are vested in the:
Ans > Parliament
- The Concept of Residuary Powers: The Seventh Schedule of the Constitution strictly divides legislative subjects into three distinct lists. Recognizing that they could not predict all future developments, the framers included Article 248 to assign “residuary powers”—the authority over any newly emerging, unlisted subject—exclusively to the national Parliament.
- Modern Era Applications: This centralizing provision has proven incredibly vital in the modern technological era. When completely new social or technological phenomena arise, such as Information Technology, cyberspace regulations, or outer space exploration, the Union Parliament automatically gains the absolute authority to regulate them (e.g., passing the IT Act of 2000).
- Historical Departure: This is a major departure from the Government of India Act 1935. Under the British colonial setup, residuary powers were given to the Governor-General, neither to the federal legislature nor the provincial assemblies, making India’s post-independence democratic choice to empower Parliament highly significant.
- Residuary Taxation: Crucially, Article 248 also explicitly encompasses the power to levy any tax not mentioned in either the State List or the Concurrent List. Parliament has frequently used this specific power to introduce new national taxes like wealth tax, gift tax, and service tax over the decades.
📌 Polity • Parliament Powers
Q.9) Article 249 empowers Parliament to legislate with respect to a matter in the State List in the national interest if a resolution is passed by the:
Ans > Rajya Sabha with a two-thirds majority of members present and voting
- Rajya Sabha as the Federal Guardian: The Rajya Sabha (Council of States) acts as the institutional representative of state interests at the federal level. Therefore, the Constitution strictly mandates its explicit permission before Parliament can legally encroach upon subjects exclusively listed in the State List.
- Stringent Special Majority Requirement: To prevent the ruling national party from casually bypassing state autonomy, Article 249 demands a stringent special majority. A resolution declaring it “necessary or expedient in the national interest” for Parliament to legislate must be supported by at least two-thirds of the Rajya Sabha members present and voting.
- Time Limitations: This constitutional transfer of power is not permanent. The passed resolution remains in force for a maximum duration of one year at a time, though it can be renewed infinitely by passing subsequent resolutions in the upper house.
- Validity of Enacted Laws: Any law enacted by Parliament under this specific provision does not become a permanent statute. It automatically ceases to have legal effect on the expiration of exactly six months after the Rajya Sabha resolution ceases to be in force, strictly limiting central overreach.
📌 Polity • Emergency Provisions
Q.10) Parliament acquires the power to legislate with respect to matters in the State List while a proclamation of National Emergency is in operation under which Article?
Ans > Article 250
- Transformation to a Unitary State: Under Article 250, whenever a National Emergency (declared under Article 352 due to war, external aggression, or armed rebellion) is in operation, the normal distribution of legislative powers is effectively suspended. The federal structure seamlessly transforms into a unitary one.
- Parliament’s Extraordinary Power: During this crisis period, the central Parliament gains the extraordinary constitutional authority to legislate on any subject enumerated in the State List for the entire country or any part of it, completely bypassing normal federal boundaries and state constraints.
- State Legislatures Continue: Interestingly, the State Legislatures are not actually suspended during a National Emergency; they retain their power to make laws on the State List. However, if there is a conflict between a state law and a parliamentary law made under Article 250, the central parliamentary law will definitively override it.
- Post-Emergency Expiration: Laws enacted by Parliament utilizing this emergency power are strictly tied to the timeline of the crisis. These laws automatically become inoperative exactly six months after the proclamation of the National Emergency ceases to operate.
📌 Polity • Cooperative Federalism
Q.11) If two or more states pass resolutions requesting Parliament to enact laws on a matter in the State List, Parliament can do so under:
Ans > Article 252
- Voluntary Surrender of Power: Article 252 represents a prime example of cooperative federalism. It allows state governments to voluntarily surrender their exclusive legislative authority to the Centre. If two or more State Legislatures pass a resolution requesting a uniform national law on a State List subject, Parliament gains the authority to enact it.
- Subsequent Adoption by Others: When Parliament enacts a law under this provision, it initially applies strictly only to the states that passed the original requesting resolution. However, any other state can subsequently adopt this parliamentary law simply by passing a resolution in its own legislative assembly.
- Loss of Amendment Power: A critical caveat for states utilizing Article 252 is that once they surrender a subject to Parliament, only Parliament can amend or repeal the resulting law. The state legislature permanently loses the power to alter or revoke that specific legislation.
- Landmark Legislation: This constitutional mechanism has been successfully utilized to pass crucial, uniform legislation across multiple state borders. Notable historical examples include the Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1974, and the Transplantation of Human Organs Act of 1994.
📌 Polity • International Relations
Q.12) Which Article empowers Parliament to make laws on any matter in the State List for implementing international treaties, agreements, or conventions?
Ans > Article 253
- Fulfilling Global Obligations: Article 253 ensures that the Government of India can act decisively and uniformly on the world stage without being hindered by internal federal disputes or state-level legislative gridlock. It allows India to strictly maintain its credibility and legally binding commitments in international relations.
- Overriding the State List: This Article is one of the most powerful centralizing provisions in the entire Constitution. It grants Parliament the absolute overriding authority to make laws for the whole or any part of India to implement any treaty, agreement, or convention with foreign countries, even if the subject matter falls strictly under the State List.
- Bypassing State Consent: Unlike Article 249 or 252, Parliament does not need any resolution from the Rajya Sabha or the state assemblies to exercise this power. It acts as an independent, unilateral authority for the Centre to force compliance with global norms.
- Key Environmental and Trade Examples: India has frequently used Article 253 to meet international obligations, particularly in environmental protection and intellectual property. Landmark laws like the Environment (Protection) Act of 1986 and domestic laws enacted to comply with the WTO’s TRIPS agreement were made possible solely through this constitutional provision.
📌 Polity • Concurrent List
Q.13) In case of a conflict between a Central law and a State law on a subject enumerated in the Concurrent List, whose law prevails as a general rule?
Ans > The Central law
- The Doctrine of Repugnancy: Article 254(1) firmly establishes the constitutional “Doctrine of Repugnancy.” It explicitly states that if a State Legislature passes a law on a subject enumerated in the Concurrent List that directly contradicts or clashes with a law passed by Parliament on the same subject, the parliamentary law shall definitively prevail.
- Voiding State Laws: In such conflict scenarios, the state law does not disappear entirely, but it becomes legally void and inoperative specifically to the extent of its repugnancy (conflict) with the Central legislation. If the central law is repealed, the dormant state law could theoretically become operative again.
- Purpose of the Concurrent List: The Concurrent List (containing subjects like criminal law, marriage, and education) exists for areas where national uniformity is highly desirable, but regional variations might be occasionally necessary. Framers granted supremacy to the Centre here to prevent legislative chaos and ensure national statutes remain uncompromised.
- Australian Constitutional Influence: The entire concept of a Concurrent List, complete with this specific mechanism of central supremacy in case of a direct legislative collision, was heavily borrowed from the Australian Constitution to expertly balance state autonomy with national harmony.
📌 Polity • State Legislation
Q.14) An exception to the rule of Central law prevailing in the Concurrent List occurs if the State law:
Ans > Has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent
- The Presidential Assent Loophole: Article 254(2) provides a unique, highly specific constitutional loophole for state governments. If a state passes a law on a Concurrent List subject that directly conflicts with an earlier Central law, the State Governor can reserve that specific bill for the President’s exclusive consideration.
- Validation of the State Law: If the President formally gives their assent to this reserved state bill, the state law is legally validated and will actively prevail over the contradictory Central law. It effectively shields the state law from being struck down for repugnancy.
- Strictly Localized Applicability: It is crucial to understand that this exception is strictly localized. The President’s assent does not validate the state law nationally; it only ensures that the state law prevails within the geographic boundaries of that specific state, allowing for customized regional adaptations to broad national laws.
- Parliament’s Ultimate Authority: Even if a state successfully secures Presidential assent and overrides a Central law locally, this victory is not permanent. Parliament retains the ultimate, overriding authority under the proviso to Article 254(2) to pass a new law adding to, amending, varying, or entirely repealing that specific state law at any subsequent time.
📌 Polity • Administrative Relations
Q.15) Administrative (Executive) relations between the Centre and the states are covered in Part XI of the Constitution from Articles:
Ans > Articles 256 to 263
- Executive Power Co-extensiveness: Chapter II of Part XI (Articles 256 to 263) addresses how administrative authority is shared. The general constitutional rule is that the executive power of the Centre and the states is co-extensive with their legislative powers. The Centre administers Union List subjects, while states administer State List subjects.
- The Strict Obligation Under Article 256: Article 256 serves as the absolute bedrock of central administrative control. It strictly obligates every state government to exercise its executive power in a way that ensures absolute compliance with the laws made by Parliament. A state cannot legally refuse to implement a central law.
- Issuance of Central Directions: To ensure this compliance, the Union executive is constitutionally empowered to issue formal administrative directions to state governments. Article 257 further expands this, allowing the Centre to direct states regarding the construction of national highways and the protection of crucial national railways.
- Consequences of Non-Compliance (Article 365): If a state repeatedly ignores or fails to comply with these central administrative directions, Article 365 allows the President to hold that a situation has arisen where the state government cannot be carried on according to the Constitution, directly paving the way for imposing President’s Rule (Article 356).
📌 Polity • Inter-State Disputes
Q.16) Article 262 of the Constitution provides for the adjudication of disputes relating to:
Ans > Waters of inter-state rivers or river valleys
- Anticipating Hydrological Conflict: Recognizing that water is a highly emotive resource critical for agriculture and survival, the Constitution’s framers anticipated severe, prolonged conflicts between states sharing river basins. Article 262 was explicitly inserted to address disputes regarding the use, distribution, or control of the waters of any inter-state river or river valley.
- Exclusive Parliamentary Authority: Article 262 grants the national Parliament the exclusive power to enact legislation specifying exactly how these inter-state water disputes should be resolved, effectively moving the mechanism away from standard judicial litigation.
- Exclusion of the Judiciary: One of the most powerful and unique aspects of Article 262 is its ability to completely bypass the normal judicial system. It allows Parliament to enact laws declaring that neither the Supreme Court nor any other lower court shall exercise jurisdiction in respect of any such inter-state water dispute.
- Focus on Technical Arbitration: By keeping these highly complex, data-heavy disputes out of standard courts, the Constitution aims to rely on specialized, technically equipped tribunals comprised of hydrological experts, topographers, and engineers to deliver fair, scientifically sound arbitration.
📌 Polity • Tribunals
Q.17) Under the Inter-State Water Disputes Act (1956), who is empowered to set up an ad hoc tribunal for the adjudication of a dispute?
Ans > The Central Government
- Statutory Implementation of Article 262: Empowered by the constitutional provisions of Article 262, Parliament enacted the Inter-State Water Disputes Act in 1956. This act creates the formal legal machinery required to resolve river sharing conflicts that arise between state governments.
- Creation of Ad Hoc Tribunals: The Act authorizes the Central Government to set up an ad hoc (temporary, case-specific) tribunal to adjudicate a specific water dispute. This is only done if the Central Government formally determines that standard political negotiations between the warring states have entirely failed and a mediated solution is impossible.
- Prominent Historical Tribunals: Over the decades, the Central Government has formed numerous high-profile tribunals to settle bitter, decades-long conflicts. Notable examples include the highly contentious Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (involving Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, and Puducherry), and the Godavari, Krishna, and Narmada tribunals.
- Binding Force of Tribunal Awards: The decisions rendered by these tribunals are not mere suggestions; they carry immense legal weight. Once the tribunal issues its final award and the Central Government publishes it in the official gazette, the decision becomes legally final and binding on all parties, holding the exact same force as an order of the Supreme Court of India.
📌 Polity • Inter-State Council
Q.18) Which Article empowers the President to establish an Inter-State Council to effect coordination between the states and between the Centre and states?
Ans > Article 263
- Institutionalizing Cooperative Federalism: Article 263 envisions a formal institutional mechanism specifically designed to facilitate cooperative federalism. It provides for the creation of an Inter-State Council to prevent friction and foster dialogue between the Union and the States, as well as among the States themselves.
- Presidential Prerogative: The power to establish this Council rests exclusively with the President of India. The President can set it up at any time if it appears that establishing such a body would serve the public interest. The President also holds the authority to define the exact nature of the duties the Council will perform.
- Core Mandate and Duties: The Council is generally tasked with investigating and discussing subjects in which some or all of the states, or the Union and one or more states, have a common interest. It aims to make recommendations for better policy coordination and harmonious action.
- Strictly Recommendatory Body: Unlike a court of law or a water dispute tribunal established under Article 262, the Inter-State Council is purely an advisory and recommendatory body. Its resolutions, advice, and findings are not legally binding on either the Central government or the State governments.
📌 Polity • Commissions
Q.19) The Inter-State Council was established in 1990 by a presidential order on the recommendation of which commission?
Ans > Sarkaria Commission
- The Decades-Long Delay: Although Article 263 was present in the Constitution since its commencement in 1950, a permanent, standing Inter-State Council was not formed for four decades. Early governments relied on ad-hoc conferences to resolve state issues.
- The Sarkaria Commission’s Mandate: In 1983, the Central Government appointed the Sarkaria Commission to comprehensively review all aspects of Centre-State relations. When it submitted its monumental report in 1988, its strongest and most prominent recommendation was the immediate establishment of a permanent Inter-State Council under Article 263.
- Implementation by the V.P. Singh Government: It took a massive shift in the national political landscape to act upon this recommendation. In 1990, the Janata Dal-led National Front government, headed by Prime Minister V.P. Singh, finally issued the necessary presidential order to formally constitute the permanent Council.
- Adapting to Coalition Politics: The Council was designed specifically to bridge the growing trust deficit between the Union and the States. As the era of single-party dominance (the Congress system) ended and regional parties gained massive power, having a structured, permanent forum for cooperative federalism became a political necessity to ensure national stability.
📌 Polity • Executive
Q.20) Who acts as the Chairman of the Inter-State Council?
Ans > The Prime Minister
- Leadership of the Prime Minister: The Inter-State Council serves as the premier constitutional forum for high-level political coordination in India. To ensure that its discussions carry the absolute highest executive weight, it is logically chaired by the Prime Minister of India.
- Comprehensive State Representation: The Council’s structural composition is deliberately designed for maximum inclusivity. It comprises all State Chief Ministers, Chief Ministers of Union Territories that possess legislative assemblies (like Delhi and Puducherry), Administrators of other UTs, and Governors of states currently under President’s Rule.
- Union Cabinet Inclusion: Alongside state leaders, the Prime Minister nominates six senior Union Cabinet Ministers (which mandatorily includes the Union Home Minister) to serve as permanent members of the Council, ensuring central policies completely align with state realities.
- The Standing Committee: Because it is highly difficult to convene all Chief Ministers frequently, a Standing Committee of the Inter-State Council was set up in 1996 for continuous consultation. This Standing Committee is chaired by the Union Home Minister and processes all matters before they are brought to the main Council chaired by the PM.
📌 Polity • Zonal Councils
Q.21) The Zonal Councils are statutory (and not constitutional) bodies. They are established by which Act?
Ans > The States Reorganisation Act of 1956
- Context of Linguistic Reorganization: In 1956, India underwent a massive, highly sensitive internal redrawing of its state borders based primarily on linguistic lines, executed through the States Reorganisation Act.
- Countering Regional Fractures: The leadership, particularly Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, feared that linguistic states might foster narrow regional fanaticism. To counter this and ensure linguistic divides didn’t threaten national unity, Zonal Councils were created as part of the very same 1956 Act to promote inter-state cooperation.
- Statutory vs. Constitutional Status: It is highly critical to note that unlike the Inter-State Council (Article 263) or the Finance Commission (Article 280), the Zonal Councils are not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution. They are strictly statutory bodies created by an Act of Parliament, meaning their structure can be altered by standard legislative procedures.
- The Five Geographical Zones: The Act originally divided the country into five distinct zones—Northern, Central, Eastern, Western, and Southern. Each zone was given a dedicated Council designed to foster cooperative habits, joint economic planning, and cultural exchange among geographically contiguous states that share natural resources, river basins, and borders.
📌 Polity • Governance
Q.22) Who acts as the common chairman of all the Zonal Councils?
Ans > The Union Home Minister
- Strategic Central Leadership: To ensure a robust, unbroken link between regional state planning and central governance, the Union Home Minister is legally designated as the ex-officio common chairman of all five Zonal Councils across India.
- Focus on Internal Security: Placing the Home Minister in this specific role guarantees that critical issues like internal security, inter-state border disputes, police coordination, and central funding are directly mediated by the highest internal security authority in the country.
- Rotational Vice-Chairmanship: While the Home Minister leads the council from the Centre, the position of Vice-Chairman is held by the Chief Ministers of the states included in that respective zone. To ensure absolute equality among states, this Vice-Chairman position rotates annually among the participating Chief Ministers.
- Promoting Central-Regional Harmony: This specific chairmanship structure allows the Home Minister to maintain a macro-perspective on national integration while actively listening to micro-level state grievances. The Councils frequently serve as vital mediation grounds for resolving complex issues like linguistic minority safeguards, inter-state transport permits, and regional infrastructure projects.
📌 Polity • Special Councils
Q.23) The North-Eastern Council, which is separate from the five Zonal Councils, was created by the North-Eastern Council Act of:
Ans > 1971
- Exclusion from the 1956 Act: When the original five Zonal Councils were created in 1956, the North-Eastern region was not included. The region presents highly unique geopolitical, strategic, and economic challenges, sharing incredibly sensitive, porous international borders with nations like China, Myanmar, and Bangladesh.
- Creation of a Specialized Body: Recognizing that standard Zonal Councils could not adequately address these highly specific security and developmental needs, Parliament passed the distinct North-Eastern Council (NEC) Act in 1971 to create a specialized statutory advisory body for the region.
- Addition of Sikkim in 2002: Originally, the NEC comprised the seven states commonly known as the “Seven Sisters” (Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, and Mizoram). In 2002, recognizing its deep geographical and cultural ties to the region, Sikkim was officially added by an amendment as the eighth member state.
- Focus on Infrastructure and Security: Unlike the other Zonal Councils, which focus heavily on linguistic and border disputes, the NEC acts primarily as a nodal agency for massive economic and social development. It heavily prioritizes central funding for inter-state transport, power grids, and coordinating counter-insurgency security operations across the remote states.
📌 Polity • All-India Services
Q.24) The Constitution grants the Parliament the power to create new All-India Services (Article 312) if a resolution is passed by the:
Ans > Rajya Sabha
- The Rajya Sabha’s Exclusive Privilege: Under Article 312 of the Constitution, Parliament can only create a new All-India Service if the Rajya Sabha first passes a resolution supported by not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting. This is an exclusive power of the upper house.
- Protecting State Autonomy: Because officers of All-India Services operate across state administrations and hold key district-level posts, they are often viewed as agents of the Centre. The Rajya Sabha requirement ensures that state representatives explicitly consent to any expansion of this central bureaucracy into their domains.
- The Three Existing Services: Currently, India has only three such services: the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), the Indian Police Service (IPS), and the Indian Forest Service (IFoS). The IAS and IPS existed at the commencement of the Constitution, but the IFoS was created much later in 1966 using this exact Article 312 mechanism.
- Balancing Federalism: All-India Services represent a unique feature of Indian cooperative federalism. While the officers are recruited, trained, and ultimately disciplined by the Central Government, they serve in state cadres under the immediate control of state governments, ensuring high administrative standards and a unified approach to governance nationwide.
📌 Polity • Financial Relations
Q.25) Which Article deals with statutory grants (grants-in-aid) given by the Parliament to states that are in need of financial assistance?
Ans > Article 275
- The Role of the Finance Commission: Article 275 empowers the national Parliament to provide statutory grants-in-aid to states that are in genuine need of financial assistance. Crucially, these grants are not distributed arbitrarily by the central government; they are awarded strictly based on the technical recommendations of the Finance Commission (constituted every five years under Article 280).
- Addressing Revenue Deficits: These statutory grants are primarily designed to bridge the post-devolution revenue deficits of states. They ensure that economically weaker or geographically disadvantaged states can maintain a minimum standard of basic administrative, healthcare, and social services for their citizens.
- Selective Distribution: Unlike tax devolution which goes to all states, Article 275 grants are highly specific. Not every state receives these grants—they are targeted exclusively at those identified by the Finance Commission as requiring extra financial support to balance their budgets.
- Mandatory Tribal Welfare Sub-Plans: Article 275 also contains highly specific, mandatory provisions. It requires grants to be paid out of the Consolidated Fund of India as capital and recurring sums specifically to enable states to promote the welfare of Scheduled Tribes or rapidly raise the level of administration in designated Scheduled Areas within those states.
📌 Polity • Public Finance
Q.26) Discretionary grants (for any public purpose) made by both the Centre and the states are provided under which Article?
Ans > Article 282
- The ‘Public Purpose’ Requirement: Article 282 allows both the Union and State governments to make financial grants for any public purpose, even if that purpose falls entirely outside their normal legislative competence. Unlike Article 275, these grants are purely discretionary and executive in nature.
- Massive Fiscal Flexibility: The only constitutional requirement is that the funds must be genuinely spent on a legitimate “public purpose.” This grants immense fiscal flexibility to the executive branch to rapidly fund emergencies, special welfare projects, or unforeseen schemes without navigating rigid statutory hurdles.
- Historical Controversy and the Planning Commission: Historically, this article became highly controversial. Before its abolition in 2014, the Planning Commission aggressively used Article 282 to disburse massive “Plan Grants” to states. At times, the volume of these discretionary central grants far exceeded the statutory grants recommended by the constitutional Finance Commission, severely skewing the federal financial balance.
- State-Level Utilization: This provision isn’t just a tool for central dominance; state governments can also utilize Article 282 to provide grants to institutions, NGOs, or bodies outside their standard legislative purview, highly promoting localized development initiatives.
📌 Polity • Federalism Committees
Q.27) The Rajamannar Committee on Centre-State relations was appointed in 1969 by the government of which state?
Ans > Tamil Nadu
- The DMK’s Push for State Autonomy: Appointed in 1969 by the DMK government in Tamil Nadu, the three-member committee headed by Dr. P.V. Rajamannar was born out of growing regional dissatisfaction. Following the decline of the Congress party’s single-party dominance across India in 1967, regional parties began pushing back strongly against the highly centralized nature of the Indian Constitution.
- Radical Structural Recommendations: Submitting its comprehensive report in 1971, the committee recommended sweeping, radical changes to secure state autonomy. Key demands included the complete abolition of Article 356 (President’s Rule), which states felt was routinely misused to topple opposition governments.
- Targeting Central Bureaucracy: The committee boldly suggested abolishing the All-India Services (IAS, IPS), viewing these officers as agents of the Centre operating within states and undermining local political authority. They also demanded transferring residuary powers entirely from the Centre to the states.
- The Union Government’s Rejection: The committee wanted the Finance Commission made into a permanent, independent body to stop central financial dictation. Unsurprisingly, the Central Government completely ignored and rejected the committee’s recommendations, deeming them too radical, divisive, and ultimately detrimental to national integration.
📌 Polity • Regional Demands
Q.28) The Anandpur Sahib Resolution, which made demands relating to Centre-State relations, was adopted in 1973 by the:
Ans > Akali Dal
- Core Demands for Extreme Autonomy: Adopted in 1973 by the Akali Dal, a major regional political and religious party in Punjab, the Anandpur Sahib Resolution was a highly controversial political document. It demanded a severe curtailment of the Union government’s powers in favor of massive, unprecedented regional autonomy for the states.
- Restriction of Central Jurisdiction: The resolution explicitly demanded that the Centre’s jurisdiction be strictly confined to only four core subjects: Defence, Foreign Affairs, Communications, and Currency. It argued that all other residuary and concurrent powers should be unconditionally transferred to the respective state governments.
- Equal Representation at the Centre: Furthermore, the resolution demanded equal authority and representation for all states at the central level, fundamentally attempting to alter the proportional representation system of the Indian Parliament to prevent domination by larger, more populous states.
- Political Strife and Fallout: While initially framed by its authors purely as a federalism and state-rights issue, the resolution became highly polarizing in the 1980s. The Central government and critics viewed it as a dangerous, thinly veiled secessionist blueprint, eventually leading to deep political strife, militancy, and tragic military action in Punjab.
📌 Polity • Sarkaria Commission
Q.29) The Sarkaria Commission on Centre-State relations was set up by the Central government in which year?
Ans > 1983
- A Pragmatic Approach to Federalism: Established in 1983 by the Indira Gandhi government and headed by retired Supreme Court Justice R.S. Sarkaria, this commission was tasked with comprehensively examining Centre-State relations. Unlike regional committees (like Rajamannar), it firmly rejected demands for massive structural changes, such as curtailing central powers, and instead focused entirely on improving functional arrangements.
- The Landmark 247 Recommendations: Submitting its exhaustive report in 1988, it made 247 highly practical recommendations. Key among them were the immediate establishment of a permanent Inter-State Council under Article 263, strengthening (rather than abolishing) the All-India Services, and ensuring the Governor’s office is held by eminent, non-political figures from outside the state.
- Guidelines against Misuse of Article 356: One of its most enduring and vital legacies was its strict guidelines against the arbitrary, politically motivated use of Article 356 (President’s Rule), which had been frequently abused by successive central governments.
- Judicial Endorsement: The commission emphatically stated that imposing central rule should only be used as an absolute “last resort” when all other constitutional options to resolve a state crisis have failed. This specific stance was later famously upheld and legally codified by the Supreme Court in the landmark S.R. Bommai case (1994).
📌 Polity • Punchhi Commission
Q.30) The Punchhi Commission on Centre-State relations was established by the Government of India in which year?
Ans > 2007
- Addressing 21st-Century Governance: Set up by the UPA government in April 2007, the commission was headed by former Chief Justice of India, Madan Mohan Punchhi. It was uniquely tasked with reviewing Centre-State relations in light of totally new realities that didn’t exist during the Sarkaria era, such as massive economic liberalization, the rise of coalition politics, and severe internal security/terrorism threats.
- Recommendations on the Governor’s Office: The commission took a very strong, reformist stance on the often-politicized role of Governors. It heavily recommended that Governors be given a fixed, secure tenure of five years to prevent their sudden, politically motivated dismissals upon a change of government at the Centre.
- Impeachment of Governors: To ensure accountability, it proposed introducing a formal impeachment procedure for Governors, identical to the rigorous process used to impeach the President of India, removing them from the absolute “pleasure of the President.”
- Tackling Internal Security: Recognizing the rapidly changing security landscape, the Punchhi Commission recommended significant amendments to the Communal Violence Bill. It boldly supported the creation of central mechanisms allowing the Union to deploy paramilitary forces in states during severe internal disturbances, even without the explicit consent of the local state government.
📌 Quick Summary — Polity Set 65
- Parliamentary System: Articles 74 & 75 outline Council of Ministers and collective responsibility; relies on fusion of powers.
- Federal Features: Indian system is based on the Canadian model (Union over Federation, centralizing bias).
- Legislative Relations (Arts 245-255): Parliament holds residuary powers (Art 248) and extraterritorial jurisdiction.
- Overriding State List: Parliament can legislate on state matters via Rajya Sabha resolution (Art 249), Emergency (Art 250), state request (Art 252), or international treaties (Art 253).
- Concurrent List Conflict (Art 254): Central law prevails unless State law gets Presidential assent.
- Administrative Relations: Articles 256-263 mandate state compliance with central laws.
- Water Disputes: Article 262 permits Parliament to establish binding ad hoc tribunals for inter-state river disputes.
- Inter-State Council (Art 263): Chaired by the PM; established in 1990 based on the Sarkaria Commission.
- Statutory Councils: Zonal Councils (1956) chaired by the Home Minister; North-Eastern Council created in 1971.
- All-India Services: Article 312 empowers Rajya Sabha to authorize the creation of new services.
- Financial Grants: Article 275 provides statutory grants-in-aid; Article 282 provides discretionary grants.
- Federalism Committees: Rajamannar (Tamil Nadu, 1969), Anandpur Sahib (Akali Dal, 1973), Sarkaria (1983), and Punchhi (2007).
Timer ⏳
15:00
Progress (0/30)
Click any card to flip and reveal the summarized answer!
Smart Review: Questions you got wrong appear here for focused study.